The relationship between intra- and intergenerational ecological justice: determinants of goal conflicts and synergies in sustainability policy
Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und Berichte › Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere
Standard
Lüneburg: Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg, 2009. (Working paper series in economics; Nr. 141).
Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und Berichte › Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
T1 - The relationship between intra- and intergenerational ecological justice
T2 - determinants of goal conflicts and synergies in sustainability policy
AU - Glotzbach, Stefanie
AU - Baumgärtner, Stefan
N1 - Literaturverz. S. 28 -33. - Parallel als Online-Ausg. erschienen unter der Adresse http://www.uni-lueneburg.de/fb2/vwl/papers/wp_141_Upload.pdf
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - The guiding principle of sustainability is widely accepted in todayś international policies. The principle contains two seperate objectives of justice with regard to the conservation and use of ecosystems and their services: (1) global justice between different people of the present generation ("intragenerational justice"); and (2) justice between people of different generations ("intergenerational justice"). Three hypotheses about the relationship between these objectives are logically possible and are, in fact, held in the political and scientific discourse on sustainable development: independency, facilitation and rivalry. Applying the method of qualitative content analysis we evaluate political documents and the scientific literature on sustainable development by systematically revealing the lines of reasoning and determinants underlying the different hypotheses. These determinants are the quantity and quality of ecosystem services, population development, substitutability of ecosystem services by humanmade goods and services, technological progress, institutions and political restrictions.
AB - The guiding principle of sustainability is widely accepted in todayś international policies. The principle contains two seperate objectives of justice with regard to the conservation and use of ecosystems and their services: (1) global justice between different people of the present generation ("intragenerational justice"); and (2) justice between people of different generations ("intergenerational justice"). Three hypotheses about the relationship between these objectives are logically possible and are, in fact, held in the political and scientific discourse on sustainable development: independency, facilitation and rivalry. Applying the method of qualitative content analysis we evaluate political documents and the scientific literature on sustainable development by systematically revealing the lines of reasoning and determinants underlying the different hypotheses. These determinants are the quantity and quality of ecosystem services, population development, substitutability of ecosystem services by humanmade goods and services, technological progress, institutions and political restrictions.
KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics
KW - sustainable development
KW - ecosystem services
KW - intragenerational justice
KW - intergenerational justice
KW - ecological justice
KW - sustainability research
KW - sustainable development
KW - ecosystem services
KW - intragenerational justice
KW - intergenerational justice
KW - ecological justice
KW - sustainability research
KW - Economics
KW - sustainable development
KW - ecosystem services
KW - intragenerational justice
KW - intergenerational justice
KW - ecological justice
KW - sustainability research
M3 - Working papers
T3 - Working paper series in economics
BT - The relationship between intra- and intergenerational ecological justice
PB - Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg
CY - Lüneburg
ER -