The relationship between intra- and intergenerational ecological justice: determinants of goal conflicts and synergies in sustainability policy

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und BerichteArbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere

Standard

The relationship between intra- and intergenerational ecological justice: determinants of goal conflicts and synergies in sustainability policy. / Glotzbach, Stefanie; Baumgärtner, Stefan.
Lüneburg: Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg, 2009. (Working paper series in economics; Nr. 141).

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und BerichteArbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere

Harvard

Glotzbach, S & Baumgärtner, S 2009 'The relationship between intra- and intergenerational ecological justice: determinants of goal conflicts and synergies in sustainability policy' Working paper series in economics, Nr. 141, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg.

APA

Glotzbach, S., & Baumgärtner, S. (2009). The relationship between intra- and intergenerational ecological justice: determinants of goal conflicts and synergies in sustainability policy. (Working paper series in economics; Nr. 141). Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg.

Vancouver

Glotzbach S, Baumgärtner S. The relationship between intra- and intergenerational ecological justice: determinants of goal conflicts and synergies in sustainability policy. Lüneburg: Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg. 2009. (Working paper series in economics; 141).

Bibtex

@techreport{98c6ac6565ce43f5893035d7cb8e569d,
title = "The relationship between intra- and intergenerational ecological justice: determinants of goal conflicts and synergies in sustainability policy",
abstract = "The guiding principle of sustainability is widely accepted in today{\'s} international policies. The principle contains two seperate objectives of justice with regard to the conservation and use of ecosystems and their services: (1) global justice between different people of the present generation ({"}intragenerational justice{"}); and (2) justice between people of different generations ({"}intergenerational justice{"}). Three hypotheses about the relationship between these objectives are logically possible and are, in fact, held in the political and scientific discourse on sustainable development: independency, facilitation and rivalry. Applying the method of qualitative content analysis we evaluate political documents and the scientific literature on sustainable development by systematically revealing the lines of reasoning and determinants underlying the different hypotheses. These determinants are the quantity and quality of ecosystem services, population development, substitutability of ecosystem services by humanmade goods and services, technological progress, institutions and political restrictions.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, sustainable development, ecosystem services, intragenerational justice, intergenerational justice, ecological justice, sustainability research, sustainable development, ecosystem services, intragenerational justice, intergenerational justice, ecological justice, sustainability research, Economics, sustainable development, ecosystem services, intragenerational justice, intergenerational justice, ecological justice, sustainability research",
author = "Stefanie Glotzbach and Stefan Baumg{\"a}rtner",
note = "Literaturverz. S. 28 -33. - Parallel als Online-Ausg. erschienen unter der Adresse http://www.uni-lueneburg.de/fb2/vwl/papers/wp_141_Upload.pdf",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
series = "Working paper series in economics",
publisher = "Institut f{\"u}r Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg",
number = "141",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Institut f{\"u}r Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - The relationship between intra- and intergenerational ecological justice

T2 - determinants of goal conflicts and synergies in sustainability policy

AU - Glotzbach, Stefanie

AU - Baumgärtner, Stefan

N1 - Literaturverz. S. 28 -33. - Parallel als Online-Ausg. erschienen unter der Adresse http://www.uni-lueneburg.de/fb2/vwl/papers/wp_141_Upload.pdf

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The guiding principle of sustainability is widely accepted in todayś international policies. The principle contains two seperate objectives of justice with regard to the conservation and use of ecosystems and their services: (1) global justice between different people of the present generation ("intragenerational justice"); and (2) justice between people of different generations ("intergenerational justice"). Three hypotheses about the relationship between these objectives are logically possible and are, in fact, held in the political and scientific discourse on sustainable development: independency, facilitation and rivalry. Applying the method of qualitative content analysis we evaluate political documents and the scientific literature on sustainable development by systematically revealing the lines of reasoning and determinants underlying the different hypotheses. These determinants are the quantity and quality of ecosystem services, population development, substitutability of ecosystem services by humanmade goods and services, technological progress, institutions and political restrictions.

AB - The guiding principle of sustainability is widely accepted in todayś international policies. The principle contains two seperate objectives of justice with regard to the conservation and use of ecosystems and their services: (1) global justice between different people of the present generation ("intragenerational justice"); and (2) justice between people of different generations ("intergenerational justice"). Three hypotheses about the relationship between these objectives are logically possible and are, in fact, held in the political and scientific discourse on sustainable development: independency, facilitation and rivalry. Applying the method of qualitative content analysis we evaluate political documents and the scientific literature on sustainable development by systematically revealing the lines of reasoning and determinants underlying the different hypotheses. These determinants are the quantity and quality of ecosystem services, population development, substitutability of ecosystem services by humanmade goods and services, technological progress, institutions and political restrictions.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - sustainable development

KW - ecosystem services

KW - intragenerational justice

KW - intergenerational justice

KW - ecological justice

KW - sustainability research

KW - sustainable development

KW - ecosystem services

KW - intragenerational justice

KW - intergenerational justice

KW - ecological justice

KW - sustainability research

KW - Economics

KW - sustainable development

KW - ecosystem services

KW - intragenerational justice

KW - intergenerational justice

KW - ecological justice

KW - sustainability research

M3 - Working papers

T3 - Working paper series in economics

BT - The relationship between intra- and intergenerational ecological justice

PB - Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg

CY - Lüneburg

ER -

Dokumente