The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression: A meta-analysis
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Standard
The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression : A meta-analysis. / Cuijpers, Pim; Driessen, Ellen; Hollon, Steven D. et al.
in: Clinical Psychology Review, Jahrgang 32, Nr. 4, 01.06.2012, S. 280-291.Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression
T2 - A meta-analysis
AU - Cuijpers, Pim
AU - Driessen, Ellen
AU - Hollon, Steven D.
AU - van Oppen, P.
AU - Barth, Jürgen
AU - Andersson, Gerhard
N1 - Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/6/1
Y1 - 2012/6/1
N2 - The effects of non-directive supportive therapy (NDST) for adult depression have been examined in a considerable number of studies, but no meta-analysis of these studies has been conducted. We selected 31 studies on NDST from a comprehensive database of trials, examining psychotherapies for adult depression, and conducted meta-analyses in which NDST was compared with control groups, other psychotherapies and pharmacotherapy. We found that NDST is effective in the treatment of depression in adults (g = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.72). NDST was less effective than other psychological treatments (differential effect size g = - 0.20; 95% CI: - 0.32 to - 0.08, p < 0.01), but these differences were no longer present after controlling for researcher allegiance. We estimated that extra-therapeutic factors (those processes operating in waiting-list and care-as-usual controls) were responsible for 33.3% of the overall improvement, non-specific factors (the effects of NDST compared with control groups) for 49.6%, and specific factors (the effects of NDST compared with other therapies) for 17.1%. NDST has a considerable effect on symptoms of depression. Most of the effect of therapy for adult depression is realized by non-specific factors, and our results suggest that the contribution of specific effects is limited at best.
AB - The effects of non-directive supportive therapy (NDST) for adult depression have been examined in a considerable number of studies, but no meta-analysis of these studies has been conducted. We selected 31 studies on NDST from a comprehensive database of trials, examining psychotherapies for adult depression, and conducted meta-analyses in which NDST was compared with control groups, other psychotherapies and pharmacotherapy. We found that NDST is effective in the treatment of depression in adults (g = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.72). NDST was less effective than other psychological treatments (differential effect size g = - 0.20; 95% CI: - 0.32 to - 0.08, p < 0.01), but these differences were no longer present after controlling for researcher allegiance. We estimated that extra-therapeutic factors (those processes operating in waiting-list and care-as-usual controls) were responsible for 33.3% of the overall improvement, non-specific factors (the effects of NDST compared with control groups) for 49.6%, and specific factors (the effects of NDST compared with other therapies) for 17.1%. NDST has a considerable effect on symptoms of depression. Most of the effect of therapy for adult depression is realized by non-specific factors, and our results suggest that the contribution of specific effects is limited at best.
KW - Psychology
KW - Health sciences
KW - Comparative outcome studies
KW - Depression
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Non-directive supportive therapy
KW - Supportive therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859069213&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.01.003
DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.01.003
M3 - Scientific review articles
C2 - 22466509
AN - SCOPUS:84859069213
VL - 32
SP - 280
EP - 291
JO - Clinical Psychology Review
JF - Clinical Psychology Review
SN - 0272-7358
IS - 4
ER -