The “distinctiveness of cities” and distinctions in cities: Boundaries of belonging in comparative perspective

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

The “distinctiveness of cities” and distinctions in cities: Boundaries of belonging in comparative perspective. / Barbehön, Marlon; Münch, Sybille.
in: Urban Research and Practice, Jahrgang 9, Nr. 1, 02.01.2016, S. 37-55.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e9bc60f5ae2641278ee5c2ffa2d5f46e,
title = "The “distinctiveness of cities” and distinctions in cities: Boundaries of belonging in comparative perspective",
abstract = "It is in cities where people are most strongly confronted with diversity in an {\textquoteleft}age of migration{\textquoteright}. However, comparisons of local integration contexts usually take ethnic boundaries as given or assume that they are constituted by the nation state. Our analysis of local discourses challenges this methodological nationalism. Departing from the {\textquoteleft}distinctiveness of cities{\textquoteright} approach, we scrutinise how Frankfurt, Dortmund, Birmingham and Glasgow differ in how diversity is discursively constructed. We maintain that the discourses not only reflect different frames in dealing with diversity but also serve as a proxy for debating the self-image of the city.",
keywords = "Politics, boundaries of belonging, construction, difference, discourse analysis, distinctiveness of cities",
author = "Marlon Barbeh{\"o}n and Sybille M{\"u}nch",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/17535069.2015.1037342",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "37--55",
journal = "Urban Research and Practice",
issn = "1753-5069",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The “distinctiveness of cities” and distinctions in cities

T2 - Boundaries of belonging in comparative perspective

AU - Barbehön, Marlon

AU - Münch, Sybille

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - It is in cities where people are most strongly confronted with diversity in an ‘age of migration’. However, comparisons of local integration contexts usually take ethnic boundaries as given or assume that they are constituted by the nation state. Our analysis of local discourses challenges this methodological nationalism. Departing from the ‘distinctiveness of cities’ approach, we scrutinise how Frankfurt, Dortmund, Birmingham and Glasgow differ in how diversity is discursively constructed. We maintain that the discourses not only reflect different frames in dealing with diversity but also serve as a proxy for debating the self-image of the city.

AB - It is in cities where people are most strongly confronted with diversity in an ‘age of migration’. However, comparisons of local integration contexts usually take ethnic boundaries as given or assume that they are constituted by the nation state. Our analysis of local discourses challenges this methodological nationalism. Departing from the ‘distinctiveness of cities’ approach, we scrutinise how Frankfurt, Dortmund, Birmingham and Glasgow differ in how diversity is discursively constructed. We maintain that the discourses not only reflect different frames in dealing with diversity but also serve as a proxy for debating the self-image of the city.

KW - Politics

KW - boundaries of belonging

KW - construction

KW - difference

KW - discourse analysis

KW - distinctiveness of cities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959174115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17535069.2015.1037342

DO - 10.1080/17535069.2015.1037342

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 9

SP - 37

EP - 55

JO - Urban Research and Practice

JF - Urban Research and Practice

SN - 1753-5069

IS - 1

ER -

DOI