Sohlenaktivierte Therapieschuhe: Eine vergleichende Trainingsmittelanalyse

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Sohlenaktivierte Therapieschuhe: Eine vergleichende Trainingsmittelanalyse. / Lohrer, Heinz; Turbanski, Stephan; Nauck, Tanja et al.
in: Sportverletzung - Sportschaden, Jahrgang 22, Nr. 4, 12.2008, S. 191-195.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Lohrer, H, Turbanski, S, Nauck, T & Schmidtbleicher, D 2008, 'Sohlenaktivierte Therapieschuhe: Eine vergleichende Trainingsmittelanalyse', Sportverletzung - Sportschaden, Jg. 22, Nr. 4, S. 191-195.

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f214b347d90941d089789696644e4437,
title = "Sohlenaktivierte Therapieschuhe: Eine vergleichende Trainingsmittelanalyse",
abstract = "Background: Manufacturers attribute specific shoe and sole constructions to induce neuromuscular training. Thus, injury prevention or rehabilitation from injury is aimed. Hypothesis: H 1 = Different shoe and sole constructions result in different load to the neuromuscular system and postural control. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: 10 healthy subjects were tested for postural stabilization using a force plate and EMG-recordings. First, each person performed three 20 sec single leg unshod stance trials (control condition). Then, MBT{\textregistered} shoe, Finnamic-Rollenschuh{\textregistered} and ReflexControl{\textregistered} shoe were applied and tested in a randomized order. Results: No difference in EMG-activity was detected comparing the barefoot condition with MBT{\textregistered} and Finnamic-Rollenschuh{\textregistered} (p = 0,051-1,000). However, with one exception (barefoot M. gastrocnemius med. EMG-activity; p = 0,110) puttingon the ReflexControl{\textregistered} shoe increased the EMG activities relative to all three tested muscles and shoe/barefoot conditions (p = 0,000-0,001). Moreover, the ReflexControl{\textregistered} shoe led to highly significantly higher postural sway (p = 0,000-0,072), while MBT{\textregistered}, Finnamic-Rollenschuh{\textregistered} and barefoot conditions were not statistically different (p = 0,818-1,000). Conclusions: This study confirms that during upright stance the ReflexControl{\textregistered} shoe is a means for neuromuscular training, while MBT{\textregistered} and Finnamic-Rollenschuh{\textregistered} simulate barefoot stance. ",
keywords = "Sportwissenschaften",
author = "Heinz Lohrer and Stephan Turbanski and Tanja Nauck and Dietmar Schmidtbleicher",
year = "2008",
month = dec,
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "22",
pages = "191--195",
journal = "Sportverletzung - Sportschaden",
issn = "1439-1236",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sohlenaktivierte Therapieschuhe

T2 - Eine vergleichende Trainingsmittelanalyse

AU - Lohrer, Heinz

AU - Turbanski, Stephan

AU - Nauck, Tanja

AU - Schmidtbleicher, Dietmar

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Background: Manufacturers attribute specific shoe and sole constructions to induce neuromuscular training. Thus, injury prevention or rehabilitation from injury is aimed. Hypothesis: H 1 = Different shoe and sole constructions result in different load to the neuromuscular system and postural control. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: 10 healthy subjects were tested for postural stabilization using a force plate and EMG-recordings. First, each person performed three 20 sec single leg unshod stance trials (control condition). Then, MBT® shoe, Finnamic-Rollenschuh® and ReflexControl® shoe were applied and tested in a randomized order. Results: No difference in EMG-activity was detected comparing the barefoot condition with MBT® and Finnamic-Rollenschuh® (p = 0,051-1,000). However, with one exception (barefoot M. gastrocnemius med. EMG-activity; p = 0,110) puttingon the ReflexControl® shoe increased the EMG activities relative to all three tested muscles and shoe/barefoot conditions (p = 0,000-0,001). Moreover, the ReflexControl® shoe led to highly significantly higher postural sway (p = 0,000-0,072), while MBT®, Finnamic-Rollenschuh® and barefoot conditions were not statistically different (p = 0,818-1,000). Conclusions: This study confirms that during upright stance the ReflexControl® shoe is a means for neuromuscular training, while MBT® and Finnamic-Rollenschuh® simulate barefoot stance.

AB - Background: Manufacturers attribute specific shoe and sole constructions to induce neuromuscular training. Thus, injury prevention or rehabilitation from injury is aimed. Hypothesis: H 1 = Different shoe and sole constructions result in different load to the neuromuscular system and postural control. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: 10 healthy subjects were tested for postural stabilization using a force plate and EMG-recordings. First, each person performed three 20 sec single leg unshod stance trials (control condition). Then, MBT® shoe, Finnamic-Rollenschuh® and ReflexControl® shoe were applied and tested in a randomized order. Results: No difference in EMG-activity was detected comparing the barefoot condition with MBT® and Finnamic-Rollenschuh® (p = 0,051-1,000). However, with one exception (barefoot M. gastrocnemius med. EMG-activity; p = 0,110) puttingon the ReflexControl® shoe increased the EMG activities relative to all three tested muscles and shoe/barefoot conditions (p = 0,000-0,001). Moreover, the ReflexControl® shoe led to highly significantly higher postural sway (p = 0,000-0,072), while MBT®, Finnamic-Rollenschuh® and barefoot conditions were not statistically different (p = 0,818-1,000). Conclusions: This study confirms that during upright stance the ReflexControl® shoe is a means for neuromuscular training, while MBT® and Finnamic-Rollenschuh® simulate barefoot stance.

KW - Sportwissenschaften

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149484089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

VL - 22

SP - 191

EP - 195

JO - Sportverletzung - Sportschaden

JF - Sportverletzung - Sportschaden

SN - 1439-1236

IS - 4

ER -

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Fraktale Dimension natürlicher Objekte
  2. Kooperation von Schule und Jugendhilfe
  3. Professionalisierung "more philosophico"
  4. Die Umsatzsteuerhaftung nach § 25d UStG
  5. Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (KPD)
  6. Warum eigentlich: eine Schule für alle ?
  7. Gestaltungskompetenz durch Neue Medien?
  8. Sportwissenschaftlicher Nachwuchs 2000
  9. Sportwissenschaftlicher Nachwuchs 2000
  10. Nationalsozialistischer Erziehungsstaat
  11. Umweltbezogenes Verhalten und Emotionen
  12. Konzeptionsentwicklung – eine Einführung
  13. Das Märchen von der Gewalt durch Medien
  14. Nascent entrepreneurs in German regions
  15. A CULTure of entrepreneurship education
  16. "Silver Workers" - Arbeiten im (Un-)Ruhestand
  17. Internationale Vergleichsuntersuchungen
  18. Kenneth Grahame, The wind in the willows
  19. Das Bildungssystem in den 1990er Jahren
  20. Konzepte der Lesekompetenz in IGLU 2006
  21. Lernen durch Reflektieren im Sportspiel
  22. Das Handwörterbuch der Ökobilanzierung
  23. Der Landschaftsbegriff in der Geographie
  24. Perspektiven auf Politikunterricht heute
  25. Tierschutz in der Verfassung und was nun?
  26. Freie Berufe im Wandel der Arbeitsmärkte
  27. Crime does pay (at least when it's violent)!
  28. Mitteilung zur Kopula von Aeshna viridis
  29. Wilhelm von Bode und die Kunst Ostasiens
  30. The German turnover tax statistics panel
  31. Zum Umgang mit Zukunft in Organisationen
  32. Medienerziehung in der Kindertagesstätte
  33. Transformationsprozesse im Kulturbereich
  34. Freie Berufe im Wandel der Arbeitsmärkte
  35. Ansparabschreibung durch Existenzgründer
  36. Erweitertes „Say on Pay“ nach dem VorstKoG
  37. "Staatsbürger mit Sehnsucht nach Harmonie"
  38. Körper und Person in historischer Sicht
  39. Bildungswachstum und soziale Differenzen