Sohlenaktivierte Therapieschuhe: Eine vergleichende Trainingsmittelanalyse

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Sohlenaktivierte Therapieschuhe: Eine vergleichende Trainingsmittelanalyse. / Lohrer, Heinz; Turbanski, Stephan; Nauck, Tanja et al.
In: Sportverletzung - Sportschaden, Vol. 22, No. 4, 12.2008, p. 191-195.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lohrer, H, Turbanski, S, Nauck, T & Schmidtbleicher, D 2008, 'Sohlenaktivierte Therapieschuhe: Eine vergleichende Trainingsmittelanalyse', Sportverletzung - Sportschaden, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 191-195.

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f214b347d90941d089789696644e4437,
title = "Sohlenaktivierte Therapieschuhe: Eine vergleichende Trainingsmittelanalyse",
abstract = "Background: Manufacturers attribute specific shoe and sole constructions to induce neuromuscular training. Thus, injury prevention or rehabilitation from injury is aimed. Hypothesis: H 1 = Different shoe and sole constructions result in different load to the neuromuscular system and postural control. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: 10 healthy subjects were tested for postural stabilization using a force plate and EMG-recordings. First, each person performed three 20 sec single leg unshod stance trials (control condition). Then, MBT{\textregistered} shoe, Finnamic-Rollenschuh{\textregistered} and ReflexControl{\textregistered} shoe were applied and tested in a randomized order. Results: No difference in EMG-activity was detected comparing the barefoot condition with MBT{\textregistered} and Finnamic-Rollenschuh{\textregistered} (p = 0,051-1,000). However, with one exception (barefoot M. gastrocnemius med. EMG-activity; p = 0,110) puttingon the ReflexControl{\textregistered} shoe increased the EMG activities relative to all three tested muscles and shoe/barefoot conditions (p = 0,000-0,001). Moreover, the ReflexControl{\textregistered} shoe led to highly significantly higher postural sway (p = 0,000-0,072), while MBT{\textregistered}, Finnamic-Rollenschuh{\textregistered} and barefoot conditions were not statistically different (p = 0,818-1,000). Conclusions: This study confirms that during upright stance the ReflexControl{\textregistered} shoe is a means for neuromuscular training, while MBT{\textregistered} and Finnamic-Rollenschuh{\textregistered} simulate barefoot stance. ",
keywords = "Sportwissenschaften",
author = "Heinz Lohrer and Stephan Turbanski and Tanja Nauck and Dietmar Schmidtbleicher",
year = "2008",
month = dec,
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "22",
pages = "191--195",
journal = "Sportverletzung - Sportschaden",
issn = "1439-1236",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sohlenaktivierte Therapieschuhe

T2 - Eine vergleichende Trainingsmittelanalyse

AU - Lohrer, Heinz

AU - Turbanski, Stephan

AU - Nauck, Tanja

AU - Schmidtbleicher, Dietmar

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Background: Manufacturers attribute specific shoe and sole constructions to induce neuromuscular training. Thus, injury prevention or rehabilitation from injury is aimed. Hypothesis: H 1 = Different shoe and sole constructions result in different load to the neuromuscular system and postural control. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: 10 healthy subjects were tested for postural stabilization using a force plate and EMG-recordings. First, each person performed three 20 sec single leg unshod stance trials (control condition). Then, MBT® shoe, Finnamic-Rollenschuh® and ReflexControl® shoe were applied and tested in a randomized order. Results: No difference in EMG-activity was detected comparing the barefoot condition with MBT® and Finnamic-Rollenschuh® (p = 0,051-1,000). However, with one exception (barefoot M. gastrocnemius med. EMG-activity; p = 0,110) puttingon the ReflexControl® shoe increased the EMG activities relative to all three tested muscles and shoe/barefoot conditions (p = 0,000-0,001). Moreover, the ReflexControl® shoe led to highly significantly higher postural sway (p = 0,000-0,072), while MBT®, Finnamic-Rollenschuh® and barefoot conditions were not statistically different (p = 0,818-1,000). Conclusions: This study confirms that during upright stance the ReflexControl® shoe is a means for neuromuscular training, while MBT® and Finnamic-Rollenschuh® simulate barefoot stance.

AB - Background: Manufacturers attribute specific shoe and sole constructions to induce neuromuscular training. Thus, injury prevention or rehabilitation from injury is aimed. Hypothesis: H 1 = Different shoe and sole constructions result in different load to the neuromuscular system and postural control. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: 10 healthy subjects were tested for postural stabilization using a force plate and EMG-recordings. First, each person performed three 20 sec single leg unshod stance trials (control condition). Then, MBT® shoe, Finnamic-Rollenschuh® and ReflexControl® shoe were applied and tested in a randomized order. Results: No difference in EMG-activity was detected comparing the barefoot condition with MBT® and Finnamic-Rollenschuh® (p = 0,051-1,000). However, with one exception (barefoot M. gastrocnemius med. EMG-activity; p = 0,110) puttingon the ReflexControl® shoe increased the EMG activities relative to all three tested muscles and shoe/barefoot conditions (p = 0,000-0,001). Moreover, the ReflexControl® shoe led to highly significantly higher postural sway (p = 0,000-0,072), while MBT®, Finnamic-Rollenschuh® and barefoot conditions were not statistically different (p = 0,818-1,000). Conclusions: This study confirms that during upright stance the ReflexControl® shoe is a means for neuromuscular training, while MBT® and Finnamic-Rollenschuh® simulate barefoot stance.

KW - Sportwissenschaften

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149484089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

VL - 22

SP - 191

EP - 195

JO - Sportverletzung - Sportschaden

JF - Sportverletzung - Sportschaden

SN - 1439-1236

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Warum eigentlich: eine Schule für alle ?
  2. Gestaltungskompetenz durch Neue Medien?
  3. Sportwissenschaftlicher Nachwuchs 2000
  4. Sportwissenschaftlicher Nachwuchs 2000
  5. Nationalsozialistischer Erziehungsstaat
  6. Umweltbezogenes Verhalten und Emotionen
  7. Konzeptionsentwicklung – eine Einführung
  8. Das Märchen von der Gewalt durch Medien
  9. Nascent entrepreneurs in German regions
  10. A CULTure of entrepreneurship education
  11. "Silver Workers" - Arbeiten im (Un-)Ruhestand
  12. Internationale Vergleichsuntersuchungen
  13. Kenneth Grahame, The wind in the willows
  14. Das Bildungssystem in den 1990er Jahren
  15. Konzepte der Lesekompetenz in IGLU 2006
  16. Lernen durch Reflektieren im Sportspiel
  17. Das Handwörterbuch der Ökobilanzierung
  18. Der Landschaftsbegriff in der Geographie
  19. Perspektiven auf Politikunterricht heute
  20. Tierschutz in der Verfassung und was nun?
  21. Freie Berufe im Wandel der Arbeitsmärkte
  22. Crime does pay (at least when it's violent)!
  23. Mitteilung zur Kopula von Aeshna viridis
  24. Wilhelm von Bode und die Kunst Ostasiens
  25. The German turnover tax statistics panel
  26. Zum Umgang mit Zukunft in Organisationen
  27. Medienerziehung in der Kindertagesstätte
  28. Transformationsprozesse im Kulturbereich
  29. Freie Berufe im Wandel der Arbeitsmärkte
  30. Ansparabschreibung durch Existenzgründer
  31. Erweitertes „Say on Pay“ nach dem VorstKoG
  32. "Staatsbürger mit Sehnsucht nach Harmonie"
  33. Körper und Person in historischer Sicht
  34. Bildungswachstum und soziale Differenzen
  35. Erwartungen an die (künftige) Lehrerschaft
  36. Chancen durch Bildung? Eine Diskurskritik.
  37. Spiele erfinden und erfinderisch spielen
  38. Wie der pädagogische Eros erfunden wurde