Sex Differences in Double Poling Performance: The Role of Upper-Body Strength and Endurance in Youth Elite Cross-Country Skiers and Biathletes

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Authors

  • Carl Maximilian Wagner
  • John Owen Osborne
  • Øyvind Sandbakk
  • Stephan Schiemann
  • Daniel Röhrs
  • Tobias Schmidt
  • Michael Keiner

The study aimed to investigate sex differences in double poling (DP) ergometer performance among youth elite cross-country skiers and biathletes and determine if these sex differences may be explained by upper-body strength and endurance capacities. Thirteen female and nine male youth elite cross-country skiers and biathletes (age: 16.7 ± 1.7 years; VO2max: 60.7 ± 6.3 mL·kg−1 min−1), matched for relative performance, completed a test battery evaluating upper-body strength and power along with various endurance parameters on a DP ergometer. Testing included one-repetition maximum (1RM) in upper-body exercises, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) running test, and DP ergometer incremental test to exhaustion and sprint tests to determine peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak-DP), maximal lactate accumulation rate (vLamax), and power. Body mass and body composition were measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. The findings demonstrated that the absolute differences in maximal strength, peak, and mean DP power outputs from both sprint and incremental tests to exhaustion (29%–38% difference), as well as maximal and peak oxygen uptake (29%–31%) between male and female athletes, were considerably reduced (2%–12%) following normalization to fat-free mass (FFM). Correlations of absolute and FFM normalized VO2max, VO2peak-DP with peak and mean power output from both sprint and incremental test to exhaustion during DP ergometry were significant (rxy = 0.69–0.87) and remained consistent after correction for sex (rxy-z = 0.61–0.84). These findings suggest that sex performance differences are primarily attributable to absolute differences in maximal aerobic power, maximal strength, and FFM.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummere12253
ZeitschriftEuropean Journal of Sport Science
Jahrgang25
Ausgabenummer4
Anzahl der Seiten12
ISSN1746-1391
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 04.2025

Bibliographische Notiz

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). European Journal of Sport Science published by Wiley-VCH GmbH on behalf of European College of Sport Science.

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Aktivitäten

  1. Leuphana Startwoche 2016
  2. SASE 2023 Annual Conference
  3. Workshop on Integrity in Non-medical Research
  4. 14th Maple Leaf and Eagle Conference on Northamerican Studies 2012
  5. Later Life Work Index (LLWI) – Erfolgreicher Umgang mit alternden Belegschaften
  6. Techniken der Vermessung des Himmels
  7. Momentum Kongress 2016
  8. EU Innovations-Inkubator (Organisation)
  9. Mohr Siebeck Verlag (Verlag)
  10. Transformationale Führung bei Lehrkräften
  11. Children‘s Literature in Foreign Language Teaching
  12. 22. Symposium Deutschdidaktik - SDD 2018
  13. HyperKult X - Computer als Medium: Spiel-Welten 2001
  14. The Distributed Human: Work, Habit and Subjects after Digital Media - SoSe 2015
  15. Fakultät Management und Technologie (Organisation)
  16. 4th Annual Meeting of the Society For Business Ethics - SBE 2015
  17. Fakultät Management und Technologie (Organisation)
  18. Australian Conference of Economists 2005 - ACE 2005
  19. Startup Booster (Externe Organisation)
  20. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (Organisation)
  21. Do sustainable institutional investors contribute to firms’ environmental performance? Empirical evidence from Europe
  22. Forschungsseminar, Newcastle University
  23. Projekte an der Waterfront in Hamburg
  24. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (Organisation)
  25. Der Sound der Macht.
  26. University of Minnesota Press (Verlag)
  27. 9. Wissenschaftlichen Tagung der Keynes-Gesellschaft 2013
  28. 25. Treffen des Netzwerks Externe Demokratisierungspolitik 2014
  29. Der Bologna-Prozess aus der Perspektive der Cultural Theory
  30. Kritische Übergänge – Relationsmodelle in der Kritik um 1900