Selbstreflexion akademischen Schreibhandelns anstoßen: Nicht-direktive Gesprächsführung als Haltung des Betreuenden
Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Aufsätze in Sammelwerken › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
Schreiben im Übergang von Bildungsinstitutionen. Hrsg. / Dagmar Knorr; Katrin Lehnen; Kirsten Schindler. Frankfurt/Main u. a.: Peter Lang Verlag, 2017. S. 109-131 (Textproduktion und Medium; Band 15).
Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Aufsätze in Sammelwerken › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Selbstreflexion akademischen Schreibhandelns anstoßen
T2 - Nicht-direktive Gesprächsführung als Haltung des Betreuenden
AU - Heine, Carmen
AU - Knorr, Dagmar
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Full perception of one’s own writing actions with its many facets is a pre-condition of reflection. Counselling and supervision can support the reflection process in various ways. The case study presented here shows how methods of writing process research can be used for supervision in writing and how it is possible to support writers in conceptualising their writing via verbalisations. The case is part of a larger study which examines a combination of writing research methods. It describes authentic text productions of a student-writing-tutor trainee participant. The participants’ writing actions during several hours of writing accompanied by introspective writing protocols where recorded by screen capture and keylogging. These methods were flanked by participant observation and combined and followed up with retrospective interview, group discussion, and dialogue-consensus and structure-formation-technique interview. In this paper, we illustrate the methods applied and focus on the roles supervisors, peer-tutors and teachers perform when they apply writing research methods in supervision, training and counselling. We shed some light on guided self-reflection and non-directive dialogue as a means to help writers to verbalise their thoughts, problems and decisions during writing.
AB - Full perception of one’s own writing actions with its many facets is a pre-condition of reflection. Counselling and supervision can support the reflection process in various ways. The case study presented here shows how methods of writing process research can be used for supervision in writing and how it is possible to support writers in conceptualising their writing via verbalisations. The case is part of a larger study which examines a combination of writing research methods. It describes authentic text productions of a student-writing-tutor trainee participant. The participants’ writing actions during several hours of writing accompanied by introspective writing protocols where recorded by screen capture and keylogging. These methods were flanked by participant observation and combined and followed up with retrospective interview, group discussion, and dialogue-consensus and structure-formation-technique interview. In this paper, we illustrate the methods applied and focus on the roles supervisors, peer-tutors and teachers perform when they apply writing research methods in supervision, training and counselling. We shed some light on guided self-reflection and non-directive dialogue as a means to help writers to verbalise their thoughts, problems and decisions during writing.
KW - Sprachwissenschaften
KW - Schreibwissenschaft
KW - Schreibdidaktik
KW - Erziehungswissenschaften
KW - Schreibwissenschaft
KW - Schreibdidaktik
UR - https://www.peterlang.com/view/9783631704301/chapter-06.xhtml#_idParaDest-62
UR - http://d-nb.info/1121232353/04
U2 - 10.3726/b10490
DO - 10.3726/b10490
M3 - Aufsätze in Sammelwerken
SN - 978-3-631-66989-1
T3 - Textproduktion und Medium
SP - 109
EP - 131
BT - Schreiben im Übergang von Bildungsinstitutionen
A2 - Knorr, Dagmar
A2 - Lehnen, Katrin
A2 - Schindler, Kirsten
PB - Peter Lang Verlag
CY - Frankfurt/Main u. a.
ER -