Private Property vs. Public Policy Vision in Ancillary Copyright Law Reform

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Private Property vs. Public Policy Vision in Ancillary Copyright Law Reform. / Herzog, Christian; Buschow, Christopher; Beil, Alessandro Immanuel.

The Algorithmic Distribution of News: Policy Responses: Policy Responses. Hrsg. / James Messe; Sara Bannerman. Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2022. S. 151-170 (Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Herzog, C, Buschow, C & Beil, AI 2022, Private Property vs. Public Policy Vision in Ancillary Copyright Law Reform. in J Messe & S Bannerman (Hrsg.), The Algorithmic Distribution of News: Policy Responses: Policy Responses. Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, S. 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87086-7_8

APA

Herzog, C., Buschow, C., & Beil, A. I. (2022). Private Property vs. Public Policy Vision in Ancillary Copyright Law Reform. in J. Messe, & S. Bannerman (Hrsg.), The Algorithmic Distribution of News: Policy Responses: Policy Responses (S. 151-170). (Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87086-7_8

Vancouver

Herzog C, Buschow C, Beil AI. Private Property vs. Public Policy Vision in Ancillary Copyright Law Reform. in Messe J, Bannerman S, Hrsg., The Algorithmic Distribution of News: Policy Responses: Policy Responses. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 2022. S. 151-170. (Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-87086-7_8

Bibtex

@inbook{12023fcfe16546bebdf34f79bad90270,
title = "Private Property vs. Public Policy Vision in Ancillary Copyright Law Reform",
abstract = "Algorithmic distribution has fundamentally altered the news industry and has led to conflicts over regulatory issues. Focusing on the introduction of European ancillary copyright, this chapter addresses an earlier international reform around algorithmic news distribution. Based on an in-depth thematic analysis of key documents from the policy formulation phase, the chapter maps the arguments for and against the ancillary copyright reform put forward by Google and news publishers in Germany. While we provide a detailed analysis of the underlying rationales of two key actors primarily affected by the regulation, we also place ancillary copyright in the context of competing private property and public policy visions, which allows for a better understanding of how and why different actors take particular positions on copyright reform and algorithmic regulation.",
keywords = "Digital media, Law",
author = "Christian Herzog and Christopher Buschow and Beil, {Alessandro Immanuel}",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-87086-7_8",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-030-87085-0",
series = "Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
pages = "151--170",
editor = "James Messe and Sara Bannerman",
booktitle = "The Algorithmic Distribution of News: Policy Responses",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Private Property vs. Public Policy Vision in Ancillary Copyright Law Reform

AU - Herzog, Christian

AU - Buschow, Christopher

AU - Beil, Alessandro Immanuel

PY - 2022/9/23

Y1 - 2022/9/23

N2 - Algorithmic distribution has fundamentally altered the news industry and has led to conflicts over regulatory issues. Focusing on the introduction of European ancillary copyright, this chapter addresses an earlier international reform around algorithmic news distribution. Based on an in-depth thematic analysis of key documents from the policy formulation phase, the chapter maps the arguments for and against the ancillary copyright reform put forward by Google and news publishers in Germany. While we provide a detailed analysis of the underlying rationales of two key actors primarily affected by the regulation, we also place ancillary copyright in the context of competing private property and public policy visions, which allows for a better understanding of how and why different actors take particular positions on copyright reform and algorithmic regulation.

AB - Algorithmic distribution has fundamentally altered the news industry and has led to conflicts over regulatory issues. Focusing on the introduction of European ancillary copyright, this chapter addresses an earlier international reform around algorithmic news distribution. Based on an in-depth thematic analysis of key documents from the policy formulation phase, the chapter maps the arguments for and against the ancillary copyright reform put forward by Google and news publishers in Germany. While we provide a detailed analysis of the underlying rationales of two key actors primarily affected by the regulation, we also place ancillary copyright in the context of competing private property and public policy visions, which allows for a better understanding of how and why different actors take particular positions on copyright reform and algorithmic regulation.

KW - Digital media

KW - Law

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/224f2a27-3742-3826-9529-72f08da1cd9c/

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-87086-7_8

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-87086-7_8

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 978-3-030-87085-0

T3 - Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business

SP - 151

EP - 170

BT - The Algorithmic Distribution of News: Policy Responses

A2 - Messe, James

A2 - Bannerman, Sara

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - Cham

ER -

DOI