On the role of critique for science: A reply to Bao and Pöppel
Research output: Journal contributions › Comments / Debate / Reports › Research
Authors
Highlights
► Science and society cannot be interpreted separately, but are always intertwined. ► Distinction between analysis of implications and analysis of consequences. ► Distinction between the methodology of immanent critique and censorship. ► No contradiction between universalism and differentialism.
► Science and society cannot be interpreted separately, but are always intertwined. ► Distinction between analysis of implications and analysis of consequences. ► Distinction between the methodology of immanent critique and censorship. ► No contradiction between universalism and differentialism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 723-725 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| ISSN | 0149-7634 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 05.2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
- Concept of science, Cultural neurosciences, Immanent critique, Implications
- Philosophy
Research areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Behavioral Neuroscience