Mass Beliefs and Democratic Institutions

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Mass Beliefs and Democratic Institutions. / Welzel, Christian Peter; Inglehart, Ronald.
The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Hrsg. / Carles Boix; Robert E. Goodin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. S. 297-316 (The Oxford Handbooks of Political Science).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Welzel, CP & Inglehart, R 2009, Mass Beliefs and Democratic Institutions. in C Boix & RE Goodin (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. The Oxford Handbooks of Political Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford, S. 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.003.0013

APA

Welzel, C. P., & Inglehart, R. (2009). Mass Beliefs and Democratic Institutions. In C. Boix, & R. E. Goodin (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (S. 297-316). (The Oxford Handbooks of Political Science). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.003.0013

Vancouver

Welzel CP, Inglehart R. Mass Beliefs and Democratic Institutions. in Boix C, Goodin RE, Hrsg., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2009. S. 297-316. (The Oxford Handbooks of Political Science). doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.003.0013

Bibtex

@inbook{f6d2817ff0e44e45a2d8487b7fcd2ae4,
title = "Mass Beliefs and Democratic Institutions",
abstract = "This article summarizes why political culture studies have been hesitant to analyze the aggregate effect of mass beliefs on democracy. It determines that this has much to do with the widespread assumption that the impact of mass beliefs on democracy can be inferred from individual-level findings. It also illustrates that this assumption actually represents an {\textquoteleft}individualistic fallacy{\textquoteright}. It considers an argument that the impact of mass beliefs on democracy can only be analyzed at the aggregate level, because democracy only exists at this level. The article ends with a report of the findings from recent studies, which show that mass beliefs have indeed an aggregate effect on the emergence and survival of democracy.",
keywords = "Politics, Gender and Diversity, Aggregate level, Democracy, Individual-level findings, Individualistic fallacy, Mass beliefs, Political culture studies",
author = "Welzel, {Christian Peter} and Ronald Inglehart",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Several Contributors 2007. All rights reserved.",
year = "2009",
month = sep,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.003.0013",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0199566020",
series = "The Oxford Handbooks of Political Science",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
pages = "297--316",
editor = "Carles Boix and Goodin, {Robert E.}",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Mass Beliefs and Democratic Institutions

AU - Welzel, Christian Peter

AU - Inglehart, Ronald

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Several Contributors 2007. All rights reserved.

PY - 2009/9/2

Y1 - 2009/9/2

N2 - This article summarizes why political culture studies have been hesitant to analyze the aggregate effect of mass beliefs on democracy. It determines that this has much to do with the widespread assumption that the impact of mass beliefs on democracy can be inferred from individual-level findings. It also illustrates that this assumption actually represents an ‘individualistic fallacy’. It considers an argument that the impact of mass beliefs on democracy can only be analyzed at the aggregate level, because democracy only exists at this level. The article ends with a report of the findings from recent studies, which show that mass beliefs have indeed an aggregate effect on the emergence and survival of democracy.

AB - This article summarizes why political culture studies have been hesitant to analyze the aggregate effect of mass beliefs on democracy. It determines that this has much to do with the widespread assumption that the impact of mass beliefs on democracy can be inferred from individual-level findings. It also illustrates that this assumption actually represents an ‘individualistic fallacy’. It considers an argument that the impact of mass beliefs on democracy can only be analyzed at the aggregate level, because democracy only exists at this level. The article ends with a report of the findings from recent studies, which show that mass beliefs have indeed an aggregate effect on the emergence and survival of democracy.

KW - Politics

KW - Gender and Diversity

KW - Aggregate level

KW - Democracy

KW - Individual-level findings

KW - Individualistic fallacy

KW - Mass beliefs

KW - Political culture studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925003960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/c4c67387-7e6b-3b0c-9edb-a6a1f9267000/

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.003.0013

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.003.0013

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 978-0199566020

SN - 019956602X

T3 - The Oxford Handbooks of Political Science

SP - 297

EP - 316

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics

A2 - Boix, Carles

A2 - Goodin, Robert E.

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - Oxford

ER -

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Europäisierung und nationale Staatsorganisation
  2. Optical part measuring inside a milling machine
  3. Mit chinesischer Medizin zu neuen Arzneimitteln
  4. Wege zur Neuorientierung des Wissensmanagements
  5. Risk management with management control systems
  6. Corrosion behavior of As-Cast binary Mg-Dy alloys
  7. Postmodern Epistemology in Organization Studies
  8. The Changing Role of Business in Global Society
  9. Personalmanagement in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben
  10. 5 Jahre Ombudschaft in der Berliner Jugendhilfe
  11. Wavelet functions for rejecting spurious values
  12. CDS spreads, systemic risk and interconnectedness
  13. Methoden zur Erfolgsmessung im Regionalmarketing
  14. Identity affirmation and social movement support
  15. Technology Development and Stakeholder Influence
  16. Vehicle routing planning with joint distribution
  17. Hannah Arendt und die "Aporien der Menschenrechte"
  18. Die Leistungsfähigkeit der Anreiz-Beitrags-Theorie
  19. Exposure of the Irish population to PBDEs in food
  20. Aufbau und Organisation von Entwicklungsprojekten
  21. Politikberatung in den USA: Ein Vorbild für Europa?
  22. Billig-standardisiert und hochwertig spezialisiert
  23. Regierungskoalitionen: Bildung und Dauerhaftigkeit
  24. Political Parties, Elections and Ethnicity in Kenya
  25. Dispatching rule selection with Gaussian processes
  26. Die betriebsratsfreie Zone aus ökonomischer Sicht
  27. Extrusion of profiles with variable wall thickness
  28. Stetigkeit nach Handels- und Steuerrecht sowie IFRS
  29. § 4 Grundzüge des materiellen Fusionskontrollrechts
  30. Partizipationsforschung und nachhaltige Entwicklung
  31. Advisory systems in pluralistic knowledge societies:
  32. Weiterentwicklung der Unternehmensberichterstattung
  33. Switching Dispatching Rules with Gaussian Processes
  34. Micro and Macro Perspectives in Organization Theory
  35. Kopplungsprobleme wissensorientierter Kommunikation
  36. Neue Formen der Beschäftigung - neue Personalpolitik?
  37. Microstructural approaches of engineering materials
  38. Basic investigations in incremental profile forming
  39. Parallelgesellschaften? Politische Eliten und Bürger.
  40. Authenticity and authentication in language learning
  41. Outsider- und Insider-Systeme der Corporate Governance
  42. Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen einer "deutschen" Limited