Laser shock peening process modelling and experimental validation of AA2198-T3 and AA2198-T8

Sören Keller; Nikolai Kashaev; Benjamin Klusemann

doi:10.1002/pamm.201710181

Laser shock peening process modelling and experimental validation of AA2198-T3 and AA2198-T8

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Konferenzaufsätze in Fachzeitschriften › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Laser shock peening process modelling and experimental validation of AA2198-T3 and AA2198-T8. / Keller, Sören; Kashaev, Nikolai; Klusemann, Benjamin.
in: Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics, Jahrgang 17, Nr. 1, 2017, S. 423 - 424.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Konferenzaufsätze in Fachzeitschriften › Forschung › begutachtet

Bibtex

@article{4154fc74161348c491d75f6f21e854fe,

title = "Laser shock peening process modelling and experimental validation of AA2198-T3 and AA2198-T8",

abstract = "Laser shock peening (LSP) is a surface treatment which improves the fatigue life of metallic structures by laser‐induced compressive residual stresses. The purpose of this work is the prediction of the measured residual stresses after LSP in sheets consisting of AA2198. Therefore, a finite element model is set‐up. The Johnson‐Cook material model is used to model the strain rate depend material behaviour during plastic deformations. Stress averaging enables the comparison between measured and predicted residual stresses. Residual stress measurements are performed using the incremental hole drilling method. The initially unknown pressure pulse is identified for AA2198‐T3 and validated with AA2198‐T8. ({\textcopyright} 2017 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)",

keywords = "Engineering",

author = "S{\"o}ren Keller and Nikolai Kashaev and Benjamin Klusemann",

note = "Volume 17 (2017) of PAMM “Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics” assembles the contributions to the 88th Annual Meeting of the Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik (GAMM), held 6 – 10 March 2017 at Weimar. Issue Online 15 March 2018 ; 88th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics - GAMM 2017, GAMM 2017 ; Conference date: 06-03-2017 Through 10-03-2017",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1002/pamm.201710181",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "423 -- 424",

journal = "Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics",

issn = "1617-7061",

publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",

number = "1",

url = "https://jahrestagung.gamm-ev.de/index.php/2017/annual-meeting-2017",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laser shock peening process modelling and experimental validation of AA2198-T3 and AA2198-T8

AU - Keller, Sören

AU - Kashaev, Nikolai

AU - Klusemann, Benjamin

N1 - Conference code: 88

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Laser shock peening (LSP) is a surface treatment which improves the fatigue life of metallic structures by laser‐induced compressive residual stresses. The purpose of this work is the prediction of the measured residual stresses after LSP in sheets consisting of AA2198. Therefore, a finite element model is set‐up. The Johnson‐Cook material model is used to model the strain rate depend material behaviour during plastic deformations. Stress averaging enables the comparison between measured and predicted residual stresses. Residual stress measurements are performed using the incremental hole drilling method. The initially unknown pressure pulse is identified for AA2198‐T3 and validated with AA2198‐T8. (© 2017 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

AB - Laser shock peening (LSP) is a surface treatment which improves the fatigue life of metallic structures by laser‐induced compressive residual stresses. The purpose of this work is the prediction of the measured residual stresses after LSP in sheets consisting of AA2198. Therefore, a finite element model is set‐up. The Johnson‐Cook material model is used to model the strain rate depend material behaviour during plastic deformations. Stress averaging enables the comparison between measured and predicted residual stresses. Residual stress measurements are performed using the incremental hole drilling method. The initially unknown pressure pulse is identified for AA2198‐T3 and validated with AA2198‐T8. (© 2017 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

KW - Engineering

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pamm.201710181

U2 - 10.1002/pamm.201710181

DO - 10.1002/pamm.201710181

M3 - Conference article in journal

VL - 17

SP - 423

EP - 424

JO - Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics

JF - Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics

SN - 1617-7061

IS - 1

T2 - 88th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics - GAMM 2017

Y2 - 6 March 2017 through 10 March 2017

ER -