Implicit theories and motivational focus: Desired future versus present reality

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Implicit theories and motivational focus: Desired future versus present reality. / Sevincer, A. Timur; Kluge, Lena; Oettingen, Gabriele.
in: Motivation and Emotion, Jahrgang 38, Nr. 1, 01.02.2014, S. 36-46.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sevincer AT, Kluge L, Oettingen G. Implicit theories and motivational focus: Desired future versus present reality. Motivation and Emotion. 2014 Feb 1;38(1):36-46. doi: 10.1007/s11031-013-9359-0

Bibtex

@article{288d9b1365464647bf2d0db83f1a6461,
title = "Implicit theories and motivational focus: Desired future versus present reality",
abstract = "People's beliefs concerning their abilities differ. Incremental theorists believe their abilities (e.g., intelligence) are malleable; entity theorists believe their abilities are fixed (Dweck in Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York, 2007). On the basis that incremental theorists should emphasize improving their abilities for the future, whereas entity theorists should emphasize demonstrating their abilities in the present reality, we predicted that, when thinking about their wishes, compared to entity theorists, incremental theorists focus more toward the desired future than the present reality. We assessed participants' motivational focus using a paradigm that differentiated how much they chose to imagine the desired future versus the present reality regarding an important wish (Kappes et al. in Emotion 11: 1206-1222, 2011). We found the predicted effect by manipulating (Study 1) and measuring implicit theories (Study 2), in the academic (Study 1) and in the sport domain (Study 2).",
keywords = "Entity theory, Future, Incremental theory, Motivational focus, Reality, Self-regulatory thought, Psychology",
author = "Sevincer, {A. Timur} and Lena Kluge and Gabriele Oettingen",
note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgments Preparation of this article was supported by German Science Foundation grant OE 237/10-1 to Gabriele Oettin-gen. We thank Greta Wagner and Linus Wittmann for their help with collecting the data.",
year = "2014",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11031-013-9359-0",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "36--46",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit theories and motivational focus

T2 - Desired future versus present reality

AU - Sevincer, A. Timur

AU - Kluge, Lena

AU - Oettingen, Gabriele

N1 - Funding Information: Acknowledgments Preparation of this article was supported by German Science Foundation grant OE 237/10-1 to Gabriele Oettin-gen. We thank Greta Wagner and Linus Wittmann for their help with collecting the data.

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - People's beliefs concerning their abilities differ. Incremental theorists believe their abilities (e.g., intelligence) are malleable; entity theorists believe their abilities are fixed (Dweck in Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York, 2007). On the basis that incremental theorists should emphasize improving their abilities for the future, whereas entity theorists should emphasize demonstrating their abilities in the present reality, we predicted that, when thinking about their wishes, compared to entity theorists, incremental theorists focus more toward the desired future than the present reality. We assessed participants' motivational focus using a paradigm that differentiated how much they chose to imagine the desired future versus the present reality regarding an important wish (Kappes et al. in Emotion 11: 1206-1222, 2011). We found the predicted effect by manipulating (Study 1) and measuring implicit theories (Study 2), in the academic (Study 1) and in the sport domain (Study 2).

AB - People's beliefs concerning their abilities differ. Incremental theorists believe their abilities (e.g., intelligence) are malleable; entity theorists believe their abilities are fixed (Dweck in Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York, 2007). On the basis that incremental theorists should emphasize improving their abilities for the future, whereas entity theorists should emphasize demonstrating their abilities in the present reality, we predicted that, when thinking about their wishes, compared to entity theorists, incremental theorists focus more toward the desired future than the present reality. We assessed participants' motivational focus using a paradigm that differentiated how much they chose to imagine the desired future versus the present reality regarding an important wish (Kappes et al. in Emotion 11: 1206-1222, 2011). We found the predicted effect by manipulating (Study 1) and measuring implicit theories (Study 2), in the academic (Study 1) and in the sport domain (Study 2).

KW - Entity theory

KW - Future

KW - Incremental theory

KW - Motivational focus

KW - Reality

KW - Self-regulatory thought

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895904587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f40d1740-1ad8-339c-89ce-5bb247ff1654/

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-013-9359-0

DO - 10.1007/s11031-013-9359-0

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84895904587

VL - 38

SP - 36

EP - 46

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Can rare arable plants benefit biological pest control potential of cereal aphids in croplands?
  2. Systematisch zur (E-) Learning Excellence
  3. Mehr Gender-Strategie tut gut
  4. Arbeitsmaterial zu "Die Chroniken von Narnia - Der König von Narnia"
  5. Transformative pedagogy for sustainable entrepreneurship and technology innovation: The case of EIT climate KIC training
  6. Editorial
  7. Optimal Harvest Licensing when Harvest Success is Uncertain
  8. Do student ratings of classroom management teil us more about teachers or about classroom composition?
  9. A New and Rapid Method for Monitoring the New Oxazolidinone Antibiotic Linezolid in Serum and Urine by High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Integrated Sample Preparation
  10. Growth and phycocyanin synthesis in the heterotrophic microalga Galdieria sulphuraria on substrates made of food waste from restaurants and bakeries
  11. Vertiefungsrichtung Ernährung
  12. Landscape diversity and the resilience of agricultural returns
  13. Gesprochene Schulsprache in der Primarstufe
  14. What are community energy companies trying to accomplish? An empirical investigation of investment motives in the German case
  15. Selbst is(s)t der Mann - Essen kochen in der Jugendarbeit
  16. Von der Suderburger Wiesenbauschule zur Modelluniversität
  17. Exports and productivity
  18. Nascent entrepreneurs
  19. Effect of salinity on filtration rates of mussels Mytilus edulis with special emphasis on dwarfed mussels from the low-saline Central Baltic Sea
  20. IT-Effizienzverstärker oder Komplexitätsbetreiber in der analytischen Unternehmenssteuerung?