Implicit theories and motivational focus: Desired future versus present reality

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Implicit theories and motivational focus: Desired future versus present reality. / Sevincer, A. Timur; Kluge, Lena; Oettingen, Gabriele.
in: Motivation and Emotion, Jahrgang 38, Nr. 1, 01.02.2014, S. 36-46.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sevincer AT, Kluge L, Oettingen G. Implicit theories and motivational focus: Desired future versus present reality. Motivation and Emotion. 2014 Feb 1;38(1):36-46. doi: 10.1007/s11031-013-9359-0

Bibtex

@article{288d9b1365464647bf2d0db83f1a6461,
title = "Implicit theories and motivational focus: Desired future versus present reality",
abstract = "People's beliefs concerning their abilities differ. Incremental theorists believe their abilities (e.g., intelligence) are malleable; entity theorists believe their abilities are fixed (Dweck in Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York, 2007). On the basis that incremental theorists should emphasize improving their abilities for the future, whereas entity theorists should emphasize demonstrating their abilities in the present reality, we predicted that, when thinking about their wishes, compared to entity theorists, incremental theorists focus more toward the desired future than the present reality. We assessed participants' motivational focus using a paradigm that differentiated how much they chose to imagine the desired future versus the present reality regarding an important wish (Kappes et al. in Emotion 11: 1206-1222, 2011). We found the predicted effect by manipulating (Study 1) and measuring implicit theories (Study 2), in the academic (Study 1) and in the sport domain (Study 2).",
keywords = "Entity theory, Future, Incremental theory, Motivational focus, Reality, Self-regulatory thought, Psychology",
author = "Sevincer, {A. Timur} and Lena Kluge and Gabriele Oettingen",
note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgments Preparation of this article was supported by German Science Foundation grant OE 237/10-1 to Gabriele Oettin-gen. We thank Greta Wagner and Linus Wittmann for their help with collecting the data.",
year = "2014",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11031-013-9359-0",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "36--46",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit theories and motivational focus

T2 - Desired future versus present reality

AU - Sevincer, A. Timur

AU - Kluge, Lena

AU - Oettingen, Gabriele

N1 - Funding Information: Acknowledgments Preparation of this article was supported by German Science Foundation grant OE 237/10-1 to Gabriele Oettin-gen. We thank Greta Wagner and Linus Wittmann for their help with collecting the data.

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - People's beliefs concerning their abilities differ. Incremental theorists believe their abilities (e.g., intelligence) are malleable; entity theorists believe their abilities are fixed (Dweck in Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York, 2007). On the basis that incremental theorists should emphasize improving their abilities for the future, whereas entity theorists should emphasize demonstrating their abilities in the present reality, we predicted that, when thinking about their wishes, compared to entity theorists, incremental theorists focus more toward the desired future than the present reality. We assessed participants' motivational focus using a paradigm that differentiated how much they chose to imagine the desired future versus the present reality regarding an important wish (Kappes et al. in Emotion 11: 1206-1222, 2011). We found the predicted effect by manipulating (Study 1) and measuring implicit theories (Study 2), in the academic (Study 1) and in the sport domain (Study 2).

AB - People's beliefs concerning their abilities differ. Incremental theorists believe their abilities (e.g., intelligence) are malleable; entity theorists believe their abilities are fixed (Dweck in Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York, 2007). On the basis that incremental theorists should emphasize improving their abilities for the future, whereas entity theorists should emphasize demonstrating their abilities in the present reality, we predicted that, when thinking about their wishes, compared to entity theorists, incremental theorists focus more toward the desired future than the present reality. We assessed participants' motivational focus using a paradigm that differentiated how much they chose to imagine the desired future versus the present reality regarding an important wish (Kappes et al. in Emotion 11: 1206-1222, 2011). We found the predicted effect by manipulating (Study 1) and measuring implicit theories (Study 2), in the academic (Study 1) and in the sport domain (Study 2).

KW - Entity theory

KW - Future

KW - Incremental theory

KW - Motivational focus

KW - Reality

KW - Self-regulatory thought

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895904587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f40d1740-1ad8-339c-89ce-5bb247ff1654/

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-013-9359-0

DO - 10.1007/s11031-013-9359-0

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84895904587

VL - 38

SP - 36

EP - 46

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. «Mein Kompetenzprofil» - Stärken erkennen und Selbstlernprozesse anstoßen
  2. Testverweigerung in DESI-Textproduktion
  3. From Short Story to Stage
  4. Agentic and communal interaction goals in conflictual intergroup relations
  5. Religiöses Coping
  6. Der Rhein, die Schokolade, das Exkrement
  7. The funeral industry and the Internet
  8. Collisions in Space
  9. The Carapacial Ridge of Turtles
  10. Right into the heart. Branford Marsalis and the blues "Housed from Edward"
  11. Managing Eco-efficiency Development for Sustainability: An Investigation of Top Carbon Polluters in Australia
  12. The Role of AI in Serious Games and Gamification for Health
  13. Inventionen. Zur Aktualisierung Poststrukturalistischer Theorie
  14. Ein Filmbild im Blick
  15. Nachhaltigkeit in der Unternehmensberichterstattung
  16. The role of past interactions in great apes' communication about absent entities
  17. A critical review of the Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) of magnesium alloys
  18. Völkerball all inklusiv
  19. Disparate disziplinäre Logiken pädagogischer Handlungsfelder
  20. Ne Win’s Burmanization Narratives and the Prospects for Peace in Today’s Myanmar
  21. Environmental management accounting and its effects on carbon management and disclosure quality
  22. ReSurveyGermany
  23. Training zur erhöhung der Eigeninitiative bei Arbeitslosen
  24. Perspektiven für eine sichere, preiswerte und umweltverträgliche Energieversorgung in Bayern
  25. Johannes Zachhuber: Theology as Science in Nineteenth-Century Germany: From F. C. Baur to Ernst Troeltsch
  26. A Place Apart: Opportunities in Developing
  27. Funktionales Denken anbahnen
  28. New Data from Official Statistics for Imports and Exports of Goods by German Enterprises
  29. Themenheft: Zu Ehren von Irene Neverla
  30. Qualifizierung von TutorInnen im LIMA-Projekt