Hierarchical Planning for Just-in-Time Deliveries

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitel

Standard

Hierarchical Planning for Just-in-Time Deliveries. / Fandel, Günter; Reese, Joachim.
Operations Research: Beiträge zur quantitativen Wirtschaftsforschung ; Tomas Gal zum 65. Geburtstag. Hrsg. / Günter Fandel; Hermann Gehring. 1. Aufl. Berlin et al.: Springer Verlag, 1991. S. 387-400.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitel

Harvard

Fandel, G & Reese, J 1991, Hierarchical Planning for Just-in-Time Deliveries. in G Fandel & H Gehring (Hrsg.), Operations Research: Beiträge zur quantitativen Wirtschaftsforschung ; Tomas Gal zum 65. Geburtstag. 1 Aufl., Springer Verlag, Berlin et al., S. 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76537-7_26

APA

Fandel, G., & Reese, J. (1991). Hierarchical Planning for Just-in-Time Deliveries. In G. Fandel, & H. Gehring (Hrsg.), Operations Research: Beiträge zur quantitativen Wirtschaftsforschung ; Tomas Gal zum 65. Geburtstag (1 Aufl., S. 387-400). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76537-7_26

Vancouver

Fandel G, Reese J. Hierarchical Planning for Just-in-Time Deliveries. in Fandel G, Gehring H, Hrsg., Operations Research: Beiträge zur quantitativen Wirtschaftsforschung ; Tomas Gal zum 65. Geburtstag. 1 Aufl. Berlin et al.: Springer Verlag. 1991. S. 387-400 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-76537-7_26

Bibtex

@inbook{fbab719f0b13460981afde71a69ab0c9,
title = "Hierarchical Planning for Just-in-Time Deliveries",
abstract = "The just-in-time (JIT) delivery of products is a considerable challenge for many firms, because suitable planning methods have to be developed and practically installed. One main problem refers to the suppliers{\textquoteright} strategy, as they are no longer able to keep their optimal lot sizes and production rates due to customers{\textquoteright} reduced call-forward rates (cf. e.g. Fandel et al. 1988 and Fandel 1988). Thus, the suppliers have to choose different planning procedures in order to assure that there will be no avoidable in-process costs, as concerns particularly the production, inventory, and transportation of products. Obviously, there exist remarkable trade-offs between the design parameters of the whole process (cf. Reese 1991), which require a simultaneous optimization of all variables.",
keywords = "Management studies, Delivery Time, Order Quantity, Setup Cost, Road Transport, Rail Transport, delivery time, order quantity, setup cost, road transport, Rail Transport",
author = "G{\"u}nter Fandel and Joachim Reese",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-76537-7_26",
language = "English",
isbn = "3-642-76539-4",
pages = "387--400",
editor = "G{\"u}nter Fandel and Hermann Gehring",
booktitle = "Operations Research",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
address = "Germany",
edition = "1",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Hierarchical Planning for Just-in-Time Deliveries

AU - Fandel, Günter

AU - Reese, Joachim

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - The just-in-time (JIT) delivery of products is a considerable challenge for many firms, because suitable planning methods have to be developed and practically installed. One main problem refers to the suppliers’ strategy, as they are no longer able to keep their optimal lot sizes and production rates due to customers’ reduced call-forward rates (cf. e.g. Fandel et al. 1988 and Fandel 1988). Thus, the suppliers have to choose different planning procedures in order to assure that there will be no avoidable in-process costs, as concerns particularly the production, inventory, and transportation of products. Obviously, there exist remarkable trade-offs between the design parameters of the whole process (cf. Reese 1991), which require a simultaneous optimization of all variables.

AB - The just-in-time (JIT) delivery of products is a considerable challenge for many firms, because suitable planning methods have to be developed and practically installed. One main problem refers to the suppliers’ strategy, as they are no longer able to keep their optimal lot sizes and production rates due to customers’ reduced call-forward rates (cf. e.g. Fandel et al. 1988 and Fandel 1988). Thus, the suppliers have to choose different planning procedures in order to assure that there will be no avoidable in-process costs, as concerns particularly the production, inventory, and transportation of products. Obviously, there exist remarkable trade-offs between the design parameters of the whole process (cf. Reese 1991), which require a simultaneous optimization of all variables.

KW - Management studies

KW - Delivery Time

KW - Order Quantity

KW - Setup Cost

KW - Road Transport

KW - Rail Transport

KW - delivery time

KW - order quantity

KW - setup cost

KW - road transport

KW - Rail Transport

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9bd5524a-7c4b-3806-ad80-d459a2763a2b/

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-76537-7_26

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-76537-7_26

M3 - Chapter

SN - 3-642-76539-4

SN - 978-3-642-76539-1

SN - 3-540-53879-8

SN - 0-387-53879-8

SP - 387

EP - 400

BT - Operations Research

A2 - Fandel, Günter

A2 - Gehring, Hermann

PB - Springer Verlag

CY - Berlin et al.

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. A family of exceptional parameters for non-uniform self-similar measures
  2. Putting benign by design into practice-novel concepts for green and sustainable pharmacy
  3. Humor und wirksame Führung
  4. Welt-Bilder und Weltmodelle
  5. Theodor Storms Gedicht „Geh nicht hinein“
  6. Prozess Simulation
  7. Developing a Green Business Portfolio
  8. Menschen und Singvögel
  9. Truth or dare? - How can we influence the adoption of artificial intelligence in municipalities?
  10. Open participation network and school health programs - Review of the BLK experiment OPUS (1997-2000) for health promotion
  11. Identifikation der Erfolgsrelevanz sozialer Themen
  12. Innovative Business Models for Offshore Wind Energy
  13. N2 fixation and performance of 12 legume species in a 6-year grassland biodiversity experiment
  14. Implementing Sustainability in Higher Education
  15. Affective States and Risky Driving Behavior of Novice and Young Drivers
  16. Freiheit durch Bindung
  17. Bildkompetenz
  18. Lagged effects in the Balanced Scorecard - Case Study
  19. Neighbourhood diversity mitigates drought impacts on tree growth
  20. Barley shoot biomass responds strongly to N:P stoichiometry and intraspecific competition, whereas roots only alter their foraging
  21. Forb diversity globally is harmed by nutrient enrichment but can be rescued by large mammalian herbivory
  22. Qualität der Bindung von Führungskräften an die AWO
  23. Digitalisierung und Eventisierung, Nationalisierung und Globalisierung
  24. Der Mythos als Relativierung des eigenen kulturellen Horizonts
  25. Exports and firm characteristics-first evidence from fractional probit panel estimates
  26. Landscape diversity and the resilience of agricultural returns
  27. A systematic review of guiding principles for sustainable urban neighborhood development
  28. Ludus non tollit abusum
  29. Flexibles Lernen in der Hochschule mit Digitalen Differenzierungsmatrizen
  30. Comment on "The environmental photolysis of perfluorooctanesulfonate, perfluorooctanoate, and related fluorochemicals"
  31. The walking debt crisis
  32. “Spicing up the Spaghetti Bowl”