EU decision-making in asylum policy: Lessons from the “refugee crisis”

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschung

Standard

EU decision-making in asylum policy: Lessons from the “refugee crisis”. / Zaun, Natascha.
Europeanisation and Renationalisation: Learning from Crises for Innovation and Development. Hrsg. / Anne Jenichen; Ulrike Liebert. Leverkusen-Opladen: Verlag Babara Budrich, 2019. S. 127-142.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschung

Harvard

Zaun, N 2019, EU decision-making in asylum policy: Lessons from the “refugee crisis”. in A Jenichen & U Liebert (Hrsg.), Europeanisation and Renationalisation: Learning from Crises for Innovation and Development. Verlag Babara Budrich, Leverkusen-Opladen, S. 127-142. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvm202v5.11

APA

Zaun, N. (2019). EU decision-making in asylum policy: Lessons from the “refugee crisis”. In A. Jenichen, & U. Liebert (Hrsg.), Europeanisation and Renationalisation: Learning from Crises for Innovation and Development (S. 127-142). Verlag Babara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvm202v5.11

Vancouver

Zaun N. EU decision-making in asylum policy: Lessons from the “refugee crisis”. in Jenichen A, Liebert U, Hrsg., Europeanisation and Renationalisation: Learning from Crises for Innovation and Development. Leverkusen-Opladen: Verlag Babara Budrich. 2019. S. 127-142 doi: 10.2307/j.ctvm202v5.11

Bibtex

@inbook{60b29963b94043b0aa13e54db8cf5e65,
title = "EU decision-making in asylum policy: Lessons from the “refugee crisis”",
abstract = "In 2015 and 2016, the European Union (EU) experienced the largest inflow of asylum-seekers in its history, with around 1.2 million people applying for asylum in each of these two years (Eurostat 2017). This inflow highlighted the persistent and profound deficiencies of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) to achieve its key aims: first, to provide harmonised ({\textquoteleft}common{\textquoteright}) asylum standards across the EU and, second, to establish a distribution scheme determining which Member State is responsible for the assessment of individual asylum claims.",
keywords = "Politics",
author = "Natascha Zaun",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.2307/j.ctvm202v5.11",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-8474-2097-2 ",
pages = "127--142",
editor = "Anne Jenichen and Liebert, {Ulrike }",
booktitle = "Europeanisation and Renationalisation:",
publisher = "Verlag Babara Budrich",
address = "Germany",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - EU decision-making in asylum policy

T2 - Lessons from the “refugee crisis”

AU - Zaun, Natascha

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In 2015 and 2016, the European Union (EU) experienced the largest inflow of asylum-seekers in its history, with around 1.2 million people applying for asylum in each of these two years (Eurostat 2017). This inflow highlighted the persistent and profound deficiencies of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) to achieve its key aims: first, to provide harmonised (‘common’) asylum standards across the EU and, second, to establish a distribution scheme determining which Member State is responsible for the assessment of individual asylum claims.

AB - In 2015 and 2016, the European Union (EU) experienced the largest inflow of asylum-seekers in its history, with around 1.2 million people applying for asylum in each of these two years (Eurostat 2017). This inflow highlighted the persistent and profound deficiencies of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) to achieve its key aims: first, to provide harmonised (‘common’) asylum standards across the EU and, second, to establish a distribution scheme determining which Member State is responsible for the assessment of individual asylum claims.

KW - Politics

U2 - 10.2307/j.ctvm202v5.11

DO - 10.2307/j.ctvm202v5.11

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 978-3-8474-2097-2

SP - 127

EP - 142

BT - Europeanisation and Renationalisation:

A2 - Jenichen, Anne

A2 - Liebert, Ulrike

PB - Verlag Babara Budrich

CY - Leverkusen-Opladen

ER -

DOI