Enforcement

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Enforcement. / Tams, Christian J.
Making Treaties Work: Human Rights, Environment and Arms Control. Hrsg. / Geir Ulfstein. Cambridge University Press, 2007. S. 391-411.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Tams, CJ 2007, Enforcement. in G Ulfstein (Hrsg.), Making Treaties Work: Human Rights, Environment and Arms Control. Cambridge University Press, S. 391-411. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494345.018

APA

Tams, C. J. (2007). Enforcement. In G. Ulfstein (Hrsg.), Making Treaties Work: Human Rights, Environment and Arms Control (S. 391-411). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494345.018

Vancouver

Tams CJ. Enforcement. in Ulfstein G, Hrsg., Making Treaties Work: Human Rights, Environment and Arms Control. Cambridge University Press. 2007. S. 391-411 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511494345.018

Bibtex

@inbook{109aaad7884648b4a668e75e2e2a6b0e,
title = "Enforcement",
abstract = "The different contributions assembled in this volume clearly bring out the complexity and sophistication of treaty regimes aimed at securing the observance of rules of international law in the fields of human rights law, international environmental law and arms control law. It is not possible, in the space of this short comment, to assess the different contributions in any detail. However, some general perspectives on the role of enforcement within the process of securing compliance with international law may be offered. More specifically, three points will be covered. First, the contributions prompt a number of remarks about issues of terminology and about the basic features of the concept of {\textquoteleft}enforcement{\textquoteright}. Secondly, and most importantly, on the basis of the distinctions thus introduced, this comment will briefly review the different enforcement strategies pursued in the fields of human rights law, international environmental law and arms control law. And, lastly, it may be fruitful to reflect about the specific features of the three fields of law from the perspective of the general law of State responsibility, as elaborated by the UN International Law Commission in its Articles on State Responsibility, adopted after second reading in August 2001. Terminology and basic distinctions It seems necessary to begin by seeking to define what is meant by {\textquoteleft}enforcement{\textquoteright}.",
keywords = "Law",
author = "Tams, {Christian J.}",
year = "2007",
month = apr,
day = "12",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511494345.018",
language = "English",
isbn = "0521873177",
pages = "391--411",
editor = "Geir Ulfstein",
booktitle = "Making Treaties Work",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Enforcement

AU - Tams, Christian J.

PY - 2007/4/12

Y1 - 2007/4/12

N2 - The different contributions assembled in this volume clearly bring out the complexity and sophistication of treaty regimes aimed at securing the observance of rules of international law in the fields of human rights law, international environmental law and arms control law. It is not possible, in the space of this short comment, to assess the different contributions in any detail. However, some general perspectives on the role of enforcement within the process of securing compliance with international law may be offered. More specifically, three points will be covered. First, the contributions prompt a number of remarks about issues of terminology and about the basic features of the concept of ‘enforcement’. Secondly, and most importantly, on the basis of the distinctions thus introduced, this comment will briefly review the different enforcement strategies pursued in the fields of human rights law, international environmental law and arms control law. And, lastly, it may be fruitful to reflect about the specific features of the three fields of law from the perspective of the general law of State responsibility, as elaborated by the UN International Law Commission in its Articles on State Responsibility, adopted after second reading in August 2001. Terminology and basic distinctions It seems necessary to begin by seeking to define what is meant by ‘enforcement’.

AB - The different contributions assembled in this volume clearly bring out the complexity and sophistication of treaty regimes aimed at securing the observance of rules of international law in the fields of human rights law, international environmental law and arms control law. It is not possible, in the space of this short comment, to assess the different contributions in any detail. However, some general perspectives on the role of enforcement within the process of securing compliance with international law may be offered. More specifically, three points will be covered. First, the contributions prompt a number of remarks about issues of terminology and about the basic features of the concept of ‘enforcement’. Secondly, and most importantly, on the basis of the distinctions thus introduced, this comment will briefly review the different enforcement strategies pursued in the fields of human rights law, international environmental law and arms control law. And, lastly, it may be fruitful to reflect about the specific features of the three fields of law from the perspective of the general law of State responsibility, as elaborated by the UN International Law Commission in its Articles on State Responsibility, adopted after second reading in August 2001. Terminology and basic distinctions It seems necessary to begin by seeking to define what is meant by ‘enforcement’.

KW - Law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928269934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/50ea9b6e-5e4e-3660-a377-f2425a9d2f55/

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511494345.018

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511494345.018

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84928269934

SN - 0521873177

SN - 9780521873178

SP - 391

EP - 411

BT - Making Treaties Work

A2 - Ulfstein, Geir

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

DOI