Ecosystem services and sustainability: descriptive means, normative goals and societal transformations

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAbstracts in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Ecosystem services and sustainability: descriptive means, normative goals and societal transformations. / Abson, David.
From Basic Ecology to the Challenges of Modern Society: 42nd annual meeting: Book of Abstracts. Hrsg. / Claudia Drees; Goddert von Oheimb. Gesellschaft für Ökologie, 2012. S. 150 (Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie; Nr. 42).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAbstracts in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Abson, D 2012, Ecosystem services and sustainability: descriptive means, normative goals and societal transformations. in C Drees & GV Oheimb (Hrsg.), From Basic Ecology to the Challenges of Modern Society: 42nd annual meeting: Book of Abstracts. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie, Nr. 42, Gesellschaft für Ökologie, S. 150, 42. Jahresversammlung der Gesellschaft für Ökologie - GfÖ 2012, Lüneburg , Deutschland, 10.09.12.

APA

Abson, D. (2012). Ecosystem services and sustainability: descriptive means, normative goals and societal transformations. In C. Drees, & G. V. Oheimb (Hrsg.), From Basic Ecology to the Challenges of Modern Society: 42nd annual meeting: Book of Abstracts (S. 150). (Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie; Nr. 42). Gesellschaft für Ökologie.

Vancouver

Abson D. Ecosystem services and sustainability: descriptive means, normative goals and societal transformations. in Drees C, Oheimb GV, Hrsg., From Basic Ecology to the Challenges of Modern Society: 42nd annual meeting: Book of Abstracts. Gesellschaft für Ökologie. 2012. S. 150. (Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie; 42).

Bibtex

@inbook{3771c38bf5424006a8d1b0d656ab15de,
title = "Ecosystem services and sustainability: descriptive means, normative goals and societal transformations",
abstract = "The ecosystem services concept is dynamic and it has engaged a number of different scientific domains during its 30 year history with resulting shifts of emphasis and focus. Moreover, the notion of “ecosystem services” has been used not simply as a descriptive tool (concept) for disinterested, objective science, but also to further several different normative goals (agendas). These agendas can be summarised as: the conservation of biodiversity, the active (efficient) management of ecosystems to ensure human well‐being; and the desire for more equitable distribution of access to natural resources. Success in each of these three agendas (conservation, well‐being and equity) is dependent onacknowledging their mutual interdependences. We argue here that aligning the (descriptive) ecosystem services concept with the broader (normative) agenda of sustainability provides a uniquely useful framework for understanding and managing human‐ecosystem interactions. In this paper we undertake a text analysis of existing ecosystem services research to map 1) how the ecosystem service concept has changed over time and 2) the extent to which this changing concept is aligned with the normative goals of sustainability. We provide a new conceptual model for ecosystem services research that frames the concept within an explicit sustainability agenda. We argue that such an explicit normative realignment of the ecosystem services, while important, is in itself insufficient ifthe concept is to become transformative. We must consider how new ecological and socio‐economic understandings of human‐ecosystem interactions can inform norms, behaviours and policies that break from the current dominant paradigm that is endangering ecological and human well‐being.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science",
author = "David Abson",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
series = "Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft f{\"u}r {\"O}kologie",
publisher = "Gesellschaft f{\"u}r {\"O}kologie",
number = "42",
pages = "150",
editor = "Claudia Drees and Oheimb, {Goddert von}",
booktitle = "From Basic Ecology to the Challenges of Modern Society: 42nd annual meeting",
address = "Germany",
note = "42nd Annual Meeting of the Ecology Society of Germany, Austria and Switzerland - GF{\"O} 2012 : From Basic Ecology to the Challenges of Modern Society, Gf{\"O} 2012 ; Conference date: 10-09-2012 Through 14-09-2012",
url = "http://www.scales-project.net/kevent.php?n=62",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Ecosystem services and sustainability: descriptive means, normative goals and societal transformations

AU - Abson, David

N1 - Conference code: 42

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The ecosystem services concept is dynamic and it has engaged a number of different scientific domains during its 30 year history with resulting shifts of emphasis and focus. Moreover, the notion of “ecosystem services” has been used not simply as a descriptive tool (concept) for disinterested, objective science, but also to further several different normative goals (agendas). These agendas can be summarised as: the conservation of biodiversity, the active (efficient) management of ecosystems to ensure human well‐being; and the desire for more equitable distribution of access to natural resources. Success in each of these three agendas (conservation, well‐being and equity) is dependent onacknowledging their mutual interdependences. We argue here that aligning the (descriptive) ecosystem services concept with the broader (normative) agenda of sustainability provides a uniquely useful framework for understanding and managing human‐ecosystem interactions. In this paper we undertake a text analysis of existing ecosystem services research to map 1) how the ecosystem service concept has changed over time and 2) the extent to which this changing concept is aligned with the normative goals of sustainability. We provide a new conceptual model for ecosystem services research that frames the concept within an explicit sustainability agenda. We argue that such an explicit normative realignment of the ecosystem services, while important, is in itself insufficient ifthe concept is to become transformative. We must consider how new ecological and socio‐economic understandings of human‐ecosystem interactions can inform norms, behaviours and policies that break from the current dominant paradigm that is endangering ecological and human well‐being.

AB - The ecosystem services concept is dynamic and it has engaged a number of different scientific domains during its 30 year history with resulting shifts of emphasis and focus. Moreover, the notion of “ecosystem services” has been used not simply as a descriptive tool (concept) for disinterested, objective science, but also to further several different normative goals (agendas). These agendas can be summarised as: the conservation of biodiversity, the active (efficient) management of ecosystems to ensure human well‐being; and the desire for more equitable distribution of access to natural resources. Success in each of these three agendas (conservation, well‐being and equity) is dependent onacknowledging their mutual interdependences. We argue here that aligning the (descriptive) ecosystem services concept with the broader (normative) agenda of sustainability provides a uniquely useful framework for understanding and managing human‐ecosystem interactions. In this paper we undertake a text analysis of existing ecosystem services research to map 1) how the ecosystem service concept has changed over time and 2) the extent to which this changing concept is aligned with the normative goals of sustainability. We provide a new conceptual model for ecosystem services research that frames the concept within an explicit sustainability agenda. We argue that such an explicit normative realignment of the ecosystem services, while important, is in itself insufficient ifthe concept is to become transformative. We must consider how new ecological and socio‐economic understandings of human‐ecosystem interactions can inform norms, behaviours and policies that break from the current dominant paradigm that is endangering ecological and human well‐being.

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://home.pf.jcu.cz/~ditom/papers/Boukal_et_al_2012_GFO.pdf

M3 - Published abstract in conference proceedings

T3 - Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie

SP - 150

BT - From Basic Ecology to the Challenges of Modern Society: 42nd annual meeting

A2 - Drees, Claudia

A2 - Oheimb, Goddert von

PB - Gesellschaft für Ökologie

T2 - 42nd Annual Meeting of the Ecology Society of Germany, Austria and Switzerland - GFÖ 2012

Y2 - 10 September 2012 through 14 September 2012

ER -