Cross-Fertilizing Qualitative Perspectives on Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: An Empirical Comparison of Four Methodical Approaches

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Cross-Fertilizing Qualitative Perspectives on Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: An Empirical Comparison of Four Methodical Approaches. / Frank, Pascal; Stanszus, Laura; Fischer, Daniel et al.
in: Mindfulness, Jahrgang 10, Nr. 11, 01.11.2019, S. 2452–2467.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3ae820330f524ef6bcd98d4a3d533fba,
title = "Cross-Fertilizing Qualitative Perspectives on Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: An Empirical Comparison of Four Methodical Approaches",
abstract = "ObjectivesQualitative methods come along with specific methodological backgrounds and related empirical strengths and weaknesses. Research is lacking addressing the question of what it precisely means to study mindfulness practices from a particular methodological point of view. The aim of this paper is to shed light on what qualities of mindfulness different qualitative methods can elucidate.MethodsBased on interviews stemming from participants of a consumer-focused mindfulness training (BiNKA), we undertook a comparison of four different analyses, namely content analysis (CA), grounded theory (GT), interpretative-phenomenological analysis (IPA), and discourse analysis (DA).ResultsIndependently applying the four methods on our data material led to the following findings: CA demonstrated that the training had effects on self-awareness, well-being, and the development of ethical qualities and influenced pre-consumptive stages of participants; GT revealed the complex set of conditions determining whether and how the mindfulness training influenced the attendees; IPA highlighted the subjectivity of the mindfulness experience, suggesting that (1) different training elements have varying effects on participants and (2) it is often not the meditation practice, but other course elements that cause the effects experienced by the attendees; DA demonstrated that the course experience was influenced by subjective theories held by the participants. In particular, they showed typical strategies of rationalizing their consumption.ConclusionsA pluralistic qualitative research assists in identifying blind spots and limitations of a single method, increases the self-reflexivity, and helps to arrive at a more comprehensive understanding of mindfulness practice or other processes of covert lived experience.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Mindfulness, Qualitative, Pluralistic qualitative research, Reflexive methodology, Sustainable Consumption",
author = "Pascal Frank and Laura Stanszus and Daniel Fischer and Klara Kehnel and Paul Grossman",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12671-019-01227-2",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "2452–2467",
journal = "Mindfulness",
issn = "1868-8527",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-Fertilizing Qualitative Perspectives on Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: An Empirical Comparison of Four Methodical Approaches

AU - Frank, Pascal

AU - Stanszus, Laura

AU - Fischer, Daniel

AU - Kehnel, Klara

AU - Grossman, Paul

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - ObjectivesQualitative methods come along with specific methodological backgrounds and related empirical strengths and weaknesses. Research is lacking addressing the question of what it precisely means to study mindfulness practices from a particular methodological point of view. The aim of this paper is to shed light on what qualities of mindfulness different qualitative methods can elucidate.MethodsBased on interviews stemming from participants of a consumer-focused mindfulness training (BiNKA), we undertook a comparison of four different analyses, namely content analysis (CA), grounded theory (GT), interpretative-phenomenological analysis (IPA), and discourse analysis (DA).ResultsIndependently applying the four methods on our data material led to the following findings: CA demonstrated that the training had effects on self-awareness, well-being, and the development of ethical qualities and influenced pre-consumptive stages of participants; GT revealed the complex set of conditions determining whether and how the mindfulness training influenced the attendees; IPA highlighted the subjectivity of the mindfulness experience, suggesting that (1) different training elements have varying effects on participants and (2) it is often not the meditation practice, but other course elements that cause the effects experienced by the attendees; DA demonstrated that the course experience was influenced by subjective theories held by the participants. In particular, they showed typical strategies of rationalizing their consumption.ConclusionsA pluralistic qualitative research assists in identifying blind spots and limitations of a single method, increases the self-reflexivity, and helps to arrive at a more comprehensive understanding of mindfulness practice or other processes of covert lived experience.

AB - ObjectivesQualitative methods come along with specific methodological backgrounds and related empirical strengths and weaknesses. Research is lacking addressing the question of what it precisely means to study mindfulness practices from a particular methodological point of view. The aim of this paper is to shed light on what qualities of mindfulness different qualitative methods can elucidate.MethodsBased on interviews stemming from participants of a consumer-focused mindfulness training (BiNKA), we undertook a comparison of four different analyses, namely content analysis (CA), grounded theory (GT), interpretative-phenomenological analysis (IPA), and discourse analysis (DA).ResultsIndependently applying the four methods on our data material led to the following findings: CA demonstrated that the training had effects on self-awareness, well-being, and the development of ethical qualities and influenced pre-consumptive stages of participants; GT revealed the complex set of conditions determining whether and how the mindfulness training influenced the attendees; IPA highlighted the subjectivity of the mindfulness experience, suggesting that (1) different training elements have varying effects on participants and (2) it is often not the meditation practice, but other course elements that cause the effects experienced by the attendees; DA demonstrated that the course experience was influenced by subjective theories held by the participants. In particular, they showed typical strategies of rationalizing their consumption.ConclusionsA pluralistic qualitative research assists in identifying blind spots and limitations of a single method, increases the self-reflexivity, and helps to arrive at a more comprehensive understanding of mindfulness practice or other processes of covert lived experience.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Mindfulness

KW - Qualitative

KW - Pluralistic qualitative research

KW - Reflexive methodology

KW - Sustainable Consumption

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071478871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/611b815a-0d7e-36e5-9e8b-f9e0910d5142/

U2 - 10.1007/s12671-019-01227-2

DO - 10.1007/s12671-019-01227-2

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 10

SP - 2452

EP - 2467

JO - Mindfulness

JF - Mindfulness

SN - 1868-8527

IS - 11

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Björn Vauk

Publikationen

  1. A focus group for operationalizing software sustainability with the MEASURE platform
  2. The Importance of Citizen Scientists in the Move Towards Sustainable Diets and a Sustainable Food System
  3. Prozessqualität oder pädagogische Beziehungsqualität
  4. From digitalization to crowdfunding platforms
  5. Treatment of comorbid alcohol use disorders and depression with cognitive-behavioural therapy and motivational interviewing
  6. BBS futur 2.0
  7. Transitions and Old Age Potential
  8. Emotional Human-Machine Interaction: Cues from Facial Expressions
  9. Transfer fällt nicht vom Himmel!
  10. Stakeholder Value Matrix
  11. SOME EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE OF THE EXPENDITURES CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF PERSONS IN THE GERMAN STATUTORY HEALTH-INSURANCE SYSTEM
  12. Komparative studier i børnelitterature
  13. 'The Returned': on the future of monographic books
  14. Activity-Based Costing as a Basis for Transfer Prices and Target Setting
  15. An empirical examination of repeated auctions for biodiversity conservation contracts
  16. A Cultural Analysis of the Economy of Affection and the Uncaptured Peasantry in Tanzania
  17. Carpet
  18. Conspicuous consumption and political regimes
  19. Zootechnologies.
  20. UNIMOLIS – A Computer-aided Course on Molecular Symmetry and Isomerism.
  21. Advancing climate compatible development: Lessons from southern Africa
  22. Kinects Bühne
  23. Reaching and recruiting Turkish migrants for a clinical trial through Facebook
  24. Audio games
  25. Potent executives
  26. High-Priced and Dangerous
  27. Rethinking megafauna
  28. Effects of elevated growth temperature and enhanced atmospheric vapour pressure deficit on needle and root terpenoid contents of two Douglas fir provenances
  29. Wirtschaftsethik - quo vadis? «Ist» und «Soll» eines Bindestxichfachs aus protestantischer Perspektive
  30. Ästhetische Kommunikation