Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis. / Stadler, Matthias; Becker, Nicolas; Gödker, Markus et al.
in: Intelligence, Jahrgang 53, 01.12.2015, S. 92-101.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Stadler M, Becker N, Gödker M, Leutner D, Greiff S. Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence. 2015 Dez 1;53:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005

Bibtex

@article{3d414da84c2e4118aeb7a18b4046f3ca,
title = "Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem- solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, researchers have hypothesized the two constructs to be everything from completely separate to identical. Over the course of almost four decades, empirical studies yielded results in support of both arguments. Our meta-analysis of 47 studies containing 60 independent samples and a total sample size of 13,740 participants revealed a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g) = .433. In addition, we investigated whether the operationalization of CPS and intelligence moderated this correlation. Whereas there were no significant correlation differences considering the operationalization of intelligence, the approach used to measure CPS moderated the correlation of CPS and intelligence. Especially the most recent approach towards the assessment of CPS yielded the strongest associations between the two constructs. Implications for existing theories and future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Complex problem-solving, Dynamic decision making, Intelligence, Meta-analysis, Multiple complex systems, Psychology",
author = "Matthias Stadler and Nicolas Becker and Markus G{\"o}dker and Detlev Leutner and Samuel Greiff",
year = "2015",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "92--101",
journal = "Intelligence",
issn = "0160-2896",
publisher = "Elvesier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complex problem solving and intelligence

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Stadler, Matthias

AU - Becker, Nicolas

AU - Gödker, Markus

AU - Leutner, Detlev

AU - Greiff, Samuel

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem- solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, researchers have hypothesized the two constructs to be everything from completely separate to identical. Over the course of almost four decades, empirical studies yielded results in support of both arguments. Our meta-analysis of 47 studies containing 60 independent samples and a total sample size of 13,740 participants revealed a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g) = .433. In addition, we investigated whether the operationalization of CPS and intelligence moderated this correlation. Whereas there were no significant correlation differences considering the operationalization of intelligence, the approach used to measure CPS moderated the correlation of CPS and intelligence. Especially the most recent approach towards the assessment of CPS yielded the strongest associations between the two constructs. Implications for existing theories and future research are discussed.

AB - The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem- solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, researchers have hypothesized the two constructs to be everything from completely separate to identical. Over the course of almost four decades, empirical studies yielded results in support of both arguments. Our meta-analysis of 47 studies containing 60 independent samples and a total sample size of 13,740 participants revealed a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g) = .433. In addition, we investigated whether the operationalization of CPS and intelligence moderated this correlation. Whereas there were no significant correlation differences considering the operationalization of intelligence, the approach used to measure CPS moderated the correlation of CPS and intelligence. Especially the most recent approach towards the assessment of CPS yielded the strongest associations between the two constructs. Implications for existing theories and future research are discussed.

KW - Complex problem-solving

KW - Dynamic decision making

KW - Intelligence

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Multiple complex systems

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943545332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84943545332

VL - 53

SP - 92

EP - 101

JO - Intelligence

JF - Intelligence

SN - 0160-2896

ER -

DOI