1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Can guided introspection help avoid rati...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Can guided introspection help avoid rationalization of meat consumption? Mixed-methods results of a pilot experimental study

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Can guided introspection help avoid rationalization of meat consumption? Mixed-methods results of a pilot experimental study. / Frank, Pascal; Heimann, Katrin; Kolbe, Viktoria et al.

in: Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, Jahrgang 6, 100070, 01.09.2022.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Frank, P, Heimann, K, Kolbe, V & Schuster, C 2022, 'Can guided introspection help avoid rationalization of meat consumption? Mixed-methods results of a pilot experimental study', Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, Jg. 6, 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100070

APA

Frank, P., Heimann, K., Kolbe, V., & Schuster, C. (2022). Can guided introspection help avoid rationalization of meat consumption? Mixed-methods results of a pilot experimental study. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 6, [100070]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100070

Vancouver

Frank P, Heimann K, Kolbe V, Schuster C. Can guided introspection help avoid rationalization of meat consumption? Mixed-methods results of a pilot experimental study. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption. 2022 Sep 1;6:100070. Epub 2022 Jun 9. doi: 10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100070

Bibtex

@article{6c8235050174492d830559ca9d45db0c,
title = "Can guided introspection help avoid rationalization of meat consumption?: Mixed-methods results of a pilot experimental study",
abstract = "The need for reducing meat consumption in affluent countries is increasingly recognized as crucial to minimizing carbon footprint. However, confronting individuals with rational arguments can prompt emotional discomfort, which is often relieved by engaging in rationalization processes stabilizing current consumption patterns. Mindfulness research suggests that making people aware of their emotional reactions through introspection can reduce these rationalization processes. In this mixed-method pilot experimental study, we inquired whether a single guided introspection, inspired by the micro-phenomenological interview technique, can alter individuals' experience of and abilities to deal with cognitive dissonance. Furthermore, we asked if such an intervention can stimulate attitude or intention changes concerning meat consumption. After inducing cognitive dissonance by exposing participants to pictures of the slaughter of a cow, the intervention group (n = 36) participated in the guided introspection, while the control group (n = 39) played solitaire. Self-report questionnaire measures of emotional discomfort, rationalization strategies, and attitudes towards meat consumption were administered before and after the intervention. Also, open-ended responses to participants{\textquoteright} experience of the study were analyzed. Quantitative results show significantly lower negative attitudes toward reducing meat consumption in the intervention group compared to the control group (partial η2 = 0.107). Qualitative results indicate that these participants are more aware of negative emotions while engaging less in rationalization strategies. We conclude that our study indicates some potential for guided introspection to affect dissonance resolution and provide suggestions for future research.",
keywords = "Introspection, Meat paradox, Micro-phenomenological interview, Mixed-method, Rationalization, Sustainable behavior, Psychology",
author = "Pascal Frank and Katrin Heimann and Viktoria Kolbe and Carolin Schuster",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100070",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Cleaner and Responsible Consumption",
issn = "2666-7843",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can guided introspection help avoid rationalization of meat consumption?

T2 - Mixed-methods results of a pilot experimental study

AU - Frank, Pascal

AU - Heimann, Katrin

AU - Kolbe, Viktoria

AU - Schuster, Carolin

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022/9/1

Y1 - 2022/9/1

N2 - The need for reducing meat consumption in affluent countries is increasingly recognized as crucial to minimizing carbon footprint. However, confronting individuals with rational arguments can prompt emotional discomfort, which is often relieved by engaging in rationalization processes stabilizing current consumption patterns. Mindfulness research suggests that making people aware of their emotional reactions through introspection can reduce these rationalization processes. In this mixed-method pilot experimental study, we inquired whether a single guided introspection, inspired by the micro-phenomenological interview technique, can alter individuals' experience of and abilities to deal with cognitive dissonance. Furthermore, we asked if such an intervention can stimulate attitude or intention changes concerning meat consumption. After inducing cognitive dissonance by exposing participants to pictures of the slaughter of a cow, the intervention group (n = 36) participated in the guided introspection, while the control group (n = 39) played solitaire. Self-report questionnaire measures of emotional discomfort, rationalization strategies, and attitudes towards meat consumption were administered before and after the intervention. Also, open-ended responses to participants’ experience of the study were analyzed. Quantitative results show significantly lower negative attitudes toward reducing meat consumption in the intervention group compared to the control group (partial η2 = 0.107). Qualitative results indicate that these participants are more aware of negative emotions while engaging less in rationalization strategies. We conclude that our study indicates some potential for guided introspection to affect dissonance resolution and provide suggestions for future research.

AB - The need for reducing meat consumption in affluent countries is increasingly recognized as crucial to minimizing carbon footprint. However, confronting individuals with rational arguments can prompt emotional discomfort, which is often relieved by engaging in rationalization processes stabilizing current consumption patterns. Mindfulness research suggests that making people aware of their emotional reactions through introspection can reduce these rationalization processes. In this mixed-method pilot experimental study, we inquired whether a single guided introspection, inspired by the micro-phenomenological interview technique, can alter individuals' experience of and abilities to deal with cognitive dissonance. Furthermore, we asked if such an intervention can stimulate attitude or intention changes concerning meat consumption. After inducing cognitive dissonance by exposing participants to pictures of the slaughter of a cow, the intervention group (n = 36) participated in the guided introspection, while the control group (n = 39) played solitaire. Self-report questionnaire measures of emotional discomfort, rationalization strategies, and attitudes towards meat consumption were administered before and after the intervention. Also, open-ended responses to participants’ experience of the study were analyzed. Quantitative results show significantly lower negative attitudes toward reducing meat consumption in the intervention group compared to the control group (partial η2 = 0.107). Qualitative results indicate that these participants are more aware of negative emotions while engaging less in rationalization strategies. We conclude that our study indicates some potential for guided introspection to affect dissonance resolution and provide suggestions for future research.

KW - Introspection

KW - Meat paradox

KW - Micro-phenomenological interview

KW - Mixed-method

KW - Rationalization

KW - Sustainable behavior

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132515689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f5509123-222d-381e-a44a-8c1bd4859bfd/

U2 - 10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100070

DO - 10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100070

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85132515689

VL - 6

JO - Cleaner and Responsible Consumption

JF - Cleaner and Responsible Consumption

SN - 2666-7843

M1 - 100070

ER -

In der gleichen Zeitschrift

Fashion consumption during COVID-19: Comparative analysis of changing acquisition practices across nine countries and implications for sustainability

Vladimirova, K., Henninger, C. E., Joyner-martinez, C., Iran, S., Diddi, S., Durrani, M., Iyer, K., Jestratijevic, I., Mccormick, H., Niinimäki, K., Thangavelu, P., Sauerwein, M., Singh, R., Simek, P. & Wallaschkowski, S., 01.06.2022, in: Cleaner and Responsible Consumption. 5, 13 S., 100056.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Did Descriptive and Prescriptive Norms About Gender Equality at Home Change During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-National Investigation

Saxler, F. M., Dorrough, A. R., Froehlich, L., Block, K., Croft, A., Meeussen, L., Olsson, M., Schmader, T., Schuster, C., van Grootel, S., Van Laar, C., Atkinson, C., Benson-Greenwald, T., Birneanu, A., Cavojova, V., Cheryan, S., Lee Kai Chung, A., Danyliuk, I., Dar-Nimrod, I., de Lemus, S., Diekman, A., Eisner, L., Estevan-Reina, L., Fedáková, D., Gavreliuc, A., Gavreliuc, D., Germano, A., Hässler, T., Henningsen, L., Ishii, K., Kundtová Klocová, E., Kozytska, I., Kulich, C., Lapytskaia Aidy, C., López López, W., Morandini, J., Ramis, T. S., Scheifele, C., Steele, J., Steffens, M. C., Velásquez Díaz, L. M., Venegas, M. & Martiny, S. E., 29.01.2024, (Elektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung) in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 15 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Gender Gap in Parental Leave Intentions: Evidence from 37 Countries

Olsson, M. I. T., van Grootel, S., Block, K., Schuster, C., Meeussen, L., Van Laar, C., Schmader, T., Croft, A., Sun, M. S., Ainsaar, M., Aarntzen, L., Adamus, M., Anderson, J., Atkinson, C., Avicenna, M., Bąbel, P., Barth, M., Benson-Greenwald, T. M., Maloku, E., Berent, J., Bergsieker, H. B., Biernat, M., Bîrneanu, A. G., Bodinaku, B., Bosak, J., Bosson, J., Branković, M., Burkauskas, J., Čavojová, V., Cheryan, S., Choi, E., Choi, I., Contreras-Ibáñez, C. C., Coogan, A., Danyliuk, I., Dar-Nimrod, I., Dasgupta, N., de Lemus, S., Devos, T., Diab, M., Diekman, A. B., Efremova, M., Eisner, L., Eller, A., Erentaite, R., Fedáková, D., Franc, R., Gartzia, L., Gavreliuc, A., Gavreliuc, D., Gecaite-Stonciene, J., Germano, A. L., Giovannelli, I., Diaz, R. G., Gitikhmayeva, L., Gizaw, A. M., Gjoneska, B., González, O. M., González, R., Grijalva, I. D., Güngör, D., Sendén, M. G., Hall, W., Harb, C., Hassan, B., Hässler, T., Hawi, D. R., Henningsen, L., Hoppe, A., Ishii, K., Jakšić, I., Jasini, A., Jurkevičienė, J., Kelmendi, K., Kirby, T. A., Kitakaji, Y., Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Kozytska, I., Kulich, C., Kundtová-Klocová, E., Kunuroglu, F., Aidy, C. L., Lee, A., Lindqvist, A., López-López, W., Luzvinda, L., Maricchiolo, F., Martinot, D., McNamara, R. A., Meister, A., Melka, T. L., Mickuviene, N., Miranda-Orrego, M. I., Mkamwa, T., Morandini, J., Morton, T., Mrisho, D., Nikitin, J., Otten, S., Pacilli, M. G., Page-Gould, E., Perandrés, A., Pizarro, J., Pop-Jordanova, N., Pyrkosz-Pacyna, J., Quta, S., Ramis, T. S., Rani, N., Redersdorff, S., Régner, I., Renström, E. A., Rivera-Rodriguez, A., Rocha, S. T. E., Ryabichenko, T., Saab, R., Sakata, K., Samekin, A., Sánchez-Pachecho, T., Scheifele, C., Schulmeyer, M. K., Sczesny, S., Sirlopú, D., Smith-Castro, V., Soo, K., Spaccatini, F., Steele, J. R., Steffens, M. C., Sucic, I., Vandello, J., Velásquez-Díaz, L. M., Vink, M., Vives, E., Warkineh, T. Z., Žeželj, I., Zhang, X., Zhao, X. & Martiny, S. E., 01.12.2023, in: Political Psychology. 44, 6, S. 1163-1192 30 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Activating an Integrative Mindset Improves the Subjective Outcomes of Value-Driven Conflicts

Schuster, C., Harinck, F. & Trötschel, R., 01.02.2023, in: Negotiation and Conflict Management Research. 16, 1, S. 80-99 20 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Egalitarian Norm Messaging Increases Human Resources Professionals’ Salary Offers to Women

Schuster, C., Sparkman, G., Walton, G. M., Alles, A. & Loschelder, D. D., 01.04.2023, in: Journal of Applied Psychology. 108, 4, S. 541-552 12 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Forschendes Lernen in der angewandten Sozialpsychologie

Schuster, C., 28.06.2022, Studentische Forschung im Praxissemester: Fallbeispiele aus der Lehrkräftebildung. Beckmann, T., Ehmke, T. & Besser, M. (Hrsg.). Bad Heilbronn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt, S. 209-213 5 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Aufsätze in Sammelwerken › Lehre

Dokumente

DOI