An-arche and Indifference: Between Giorgio Agamben, Jacques Derrida, and Reiner Schürmann

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

An-arche and Indifference: Between Giorgio Agamben, Jacques Derrida, and Reiner Schürmann. / Rauch, Malte Fabian.
in: Philosophy Today, Jahrgang 65, Nr. 3, 2021, S. 619-636.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{7593e2e4fc594ff7aadf5b2f5d6a8e1a,
title = "An-arche and Indifference: Between Giorgio Agamben, Jacques Derrida, and Reiner Sch{\"u}rmann",
abstract = "This essay explores Giorgio Agamben{\textquoteright}s engagement with Reiner Sch{\"u}rmann, focusing in particular on their ontological understanding of anarchy. Setting out from the lacuna in the literature on this issue, it gives a close reading of the passages where Agamben addresses Sch{\"u}rmann, interrogates the role of of arche in Agamben{\textquoteright}s works and links his interest in Sch{\"u}rmann to his long-standing critique of Derrida. Tracing these issues through Agamben{\textquoteright}s and Sch{\"u}rmann{\textquoteright}s texts, it becomes apparent that both authors operate with a strikingly similar approach, while adumbrating different understandings of the rapport between arche, anarchy and difference. Specifically, the essay argues that Sch{\"u}rmann{\textquoteright}s work can be seen as an incisive reference point in Agamben{\textquoteright}s recent theory of “destituent potential” by focusing on the epilogue of The Use of Bodies. Here, arche and anarchy are positioned as the basic operative categories of the entire Homo Sacer project, while the concept of “true anarchy,” developed in critical dialogue with Sch{\"u}rmann, turns into its philosophical vanishing point. With and against Sch{\"u}rmann{\textquoteright}s attempt to think anarchy as an interruption of identity through difference, Agamben develops his notion of anarchy as as a suspension of difference, that is, as in-difference.",
keywords = "Philosophy, philosophy of difference, indifference, Inoperativity, political ontology, originary ethics, anti-foundationalism, deconstruction, ontological anarchy",
author = "Rauch, {Malte Fabian}",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.5840/philtoday2021520410",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "619--636",
journal = "Philosophy Today",
issn = "0031-8256",
publisher = "Philosophy Documentation Center",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An-arche and Indifference

T2 - Between Giorgio Agamben, Jacques Derrida, and Reiner Schürmann

AU - Rauch, Malte Fabian

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This essay explores Giorgio Agamben’s engagement with Reiner Schürmann, focusing in particular on their ontological understanding of anarchy. Setting out from the lacuna in the literature on this issue, it gives a close reading of the passages where Agamben addresses Schürmann, interrogates the role of of arche in Agamben’s works and links his interest in Schürmann to his long-standing critique of Derrida. Tracing these issues through Agamben’s and Schürmann’s texts, it becomes apparent that both authors operate with a strikingly similar approach, while adumbrating different understandings of the rapport between arche, anarchy and difference. Specifically, the essay argues that Schürmann’s work can be seen as an incisive reference point in Agamben’s recent theory of “destituent potential” by focusing on the epilogue of The Use of Bodies. Here, arche and anarchy are positioned as the basic operative categories of the entire Homo Sacer project, while the concept of “true anarchy,” developed in critical dialogue with Schürmann, turns into its philosophical vanishing point. With and against Schürmann’s attempt to think anarchy as an interruption of identity through difference, Agamben develops his notion of anarchy as as a suspension of difference, that is, as in-difference.

AB - This essay explores Giorgio Agamben’s engagement with Reiner Schürmann, focusing in particular on their ontological understanding of anarchy. Setting out from the lacuna in the literature on this issue, it gives a close reading of the passages where Agamben addresses Schürmann, interrogates the role of of arche in Agamben’s works and links his interest in Schürmann to his long-standing critique of Derrida. Tracing these issues through Agamben’s and Schürmann’s texts, it becomes apparent that both authors operate with a strikingly similar approach, while adumbrating different understandings of the rapport between arche, anarchy and difference. Specifically, the essay argues that Schürmann’s work can be seen as an incisive reference point in Agamben’s recent theory of “destituent potential” by focusing on the epilogue of The Use of Bodies. Here, arche and anarchy are positioned as the basic operative categories of the entire Homo Sacer project, while the concept of “true anarchy,” developed in critical dialogue with Schürmann, turns into its philosophical vanishing point. With and against Schürmann’s attempt to think anarchy as an interruption of identity through difference, Agamben develops his notion of anarchy as as a suspension of difference, that is, as in-difference.

KW - Philosophy

KW - philosophy of difference

KW - indifference

KW - Inoperativity

KW - political ontology

KW - originary ethics

KW - anti-foundationalism

KW - deconstruction

KW - ontological anarchy

UR - https://www.pdcnet.org/philtoday/onlinefirst

U2 - 10.5840/philtoday2021520410

DO - 10.5840/philtoday2021520410

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 65

SP - 619

EP - 636

JO - Philosophy Today

JF - Philosophy Today

SN - 0031-8256

IS - 3

ER -

DOI