A social-ecological assessment of food security and biodiversity conservation in Ethiopia
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Ecosystems and People, Jahrgang 17, Nr. 1, 28.07.2021, S. 400-410.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A social-ecological assessment of food security and biodiversity conservation in Ethiopia
AU - Fischer, Joern
AU - Bergsten, Arvid
AU - Dorresteijn, Ine
AU - Hanspach, Jan
AU - Hylander, Kristoffer
AU - Jiren, Tolera S.
AU - Manlosa, Aisa O.
AU - Rodrigues, Patricia
AU - Schultner, Jannik
AU - Senbeta, Feyera
AU - Shumi, Girma
N1 - This publication was funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of Leuphana University Lüneburg.
PY - 2021/7/28
Y1 - 2021/7/28
N2 - We studied food security and biodiversity conservation from a social-ecological perspective in southwestern Ethiopia. Specialist tree, bird, and mammal species required large, undisturbed forest, supporting the notion of ‘land sparing’ for conservation. However, our findings also suggest that forest areas should be embedded within a multifunctional landscape matrix (i.e. ‘land sharing’), because farmland also supported many species and ecosystem services and was the basis of diversified livelihoods. Diversified livelihoods improved smallholder food security, while lack of access to capital assets and crop raiding by wild forest animals negatively influenced food security. Food and biodiversity governance lacked coordination and was strongly hierarchical, with relatively few stakeholders being highly powerful. Our study shows that issues of livelihoods, access to resources, governance and equity are central when resolving challenges around food security and biodiversity. A multi-facetted, social-ecological approach is better able to capture such complexity than the conventional, two-dimensional land sparing versus sharing framework.
AB - We studied food security and biodiversity conservation from a social-ecological perspective in southwestern Ethiopia. Specialist tree, bird, and mammal species required large, undisturbed forest, supporting the notion of ‘land sparing’ for conservation. However, our findings also suggest that forest areas should be embedded within a multifunctional landscape matrix (i.e. ‘land sharing’), because farmland also supported many species and ecosystem services and was the basis of diversified livelihoods. Diversified livelihoods improved smallholder food security, while lack of access to capital assets and crop raiding by wild forest animals negatively influenced food security. Food and biodiversity governance lacked coordination and was strongly hierarchical, with relatively few stakeholders being highly powerful. Our study shows that issues of livelihoods, access to resources, governance and equity are central when resolving challenges around food security and biodiversity. A multi-facetted, social-ecological approach is better able to capture such complexity than the conventional, two-dimensional land sparing versus sharing framework.
KW - Agroecology
KW - transdisciplinarity
KW - land sharing
KW - land sparing
KW - resilience
KW - social-ecological systems
KW - sustainability science
KW - Ecosystems Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111496959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/26395916.2021.1952306
DO - 10.1080/26395916.2021.1952306
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 34396139
AN - SCOPUS:85111496959
VL - 17
SP - 400
EP - 410
JO - Ecosystems and People
JF - Ecosystems and People
SN - 2639-5908
IS - 1
ER -