A social-ecological assessment of food security and biodiversity conservation in Ethiopia

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

A social-ecological assessment of food security and biodiversity conservation in Ethiopia. / Fischer, Joern; Bergsten, Arvid; Dorresteijn, Ine et al.

In: Ecosystems and People, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2021, p. 400-410.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{495f80621ebb485fa71cafe8c33cbae0,
title = "A social-ecological assessment of food security and biodiversity conservation in Ethiopia",
abstract = "We studied food security and biodiversity conservation from a social-ecological perspective in southwestern Ethiopia. Specialist tree, bird, and mammal species required large, undisturbed forest, supporting the notion of {\textquoteleft}land sparing{\textquoteright} for conservation. However, our findings also suggest that forest areas should be embedded within a multifunctional landscape matrix (i.e. {\textquoteleft}land sharing{\textquoteright}), because farmland also supported many species and ecosystem services and was the basis of diversified livelihoods. Diversified livelihoods improved smallholder food security, while lack of access to capital assets and crop raiding by wild forest animals negatively influenced food security. Food and biodiversity governance lacked coordination and was strongly hierarchical, with relatively few stakeholders being highly powerful. Our study shows that issues of livelihoods, access to resources, governance and equity are central when resolving challenges around food security and biodiversity. A multi-facetted, social-ecological approach is better able to capture such complexity than the conventional, two-dimensional land sparing versus sharing framework.",
keywords = "Agroecology, transdisciplinarity, land sharing, land sparing, resilience, social-ecological systems, sustainability science, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Joern Fischer and Arvid Bergsten and Ine Dorresteijn and Jan Hanspach and Kristoffer Hylander and Jiren, {Tolera S.} and Manlosa, {Aisa O.} and Patricia Rodrigues and Jannik Schultner and Feyera Senbeta and Girma Shumi",
note = "This article is part of the following collections: Celebrating 10 years of the Program on Ecosystem Change and Society This work was supported by the FP7 People: AB was funded by H2020 Marie-Curie-Actions, project number 661780. JF was funded by the European Research Council, project number 614278. Most of the research synthesized here was funded through a Consolidator Grant by the European Research Council to JF. AB was funded through a Marie-Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship. We thank two anonymous reviewers and the handling editor for constructive suggestions on previous drafts of this manuscript. This publication was funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of Leuphana University L{\"u}neburg. ",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1080/26395916.2021.1952306",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "400--410",
journal = "Ecosystems and People",
issn = "2639-5908",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A social-ecological assessment of food security and biodiversity conservation in Ethiopia

AU - Fischer, Joern

AU - Bergsten, Arvid

AU - Dorresteijn, Ine

AU - Hanspach, Jan

AU - Hylander, Kristoffer

AU - Jiren, Tolera S.

AU - Manlosa, Aisa O.

AU - Rodrigues, Patricia

AU - Schultner, Jannik

AU - Senbeta, Feyera

AU - Shumi, Girma

N1 - This article is part of the following collections: Celebrating 10 years of the Program on Ecosystem Change and Society This work was supported by the FP7 People: AB was funded by H2020 Marie-Curie-Actions, project number 661780. JF was funded by the European Research Council, project number 614278. Most of the research synthesized here was funded through a Consolidator Grant by the European Research Council to JF. AB was funded through a Marie-Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship. We thank two anonymous reviewers and the handling editor for constructive suggestions on previous drafts of this manuscript. This publication was funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of Leuphana University Lüneburg.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - We studied food security and biodiversity conservation from a social-ecological perspective in southwestern Ethiopia. Specialist tree, bird, and mammal species required large, undisturbed forest, supporting the notion of ‘land sparing’ for conservation. However, our findings also suggest that forest areas should be embedded within a multifunctional landscape matrix (i.e. ‘land sharing’), because farmland also supported many species and ecosystem services and was the basis of diversified livelihoods. Diversified livelihoods improved smallholder food security, while lack of access to capital assets and crop raiding by wild forest animals negatively influenced food security. Food and biodiversity governance lacked coordination and was strongly hierarchical, with relatively few stakeholders being highly powerful. Our study shows that issues of livelihoods, access to resources, governance and equity are central when resolving challenges around food security and biodiversity. A multi-facetted, social-ecological approach is better able to capture such complexity than the conventional, two-dimensional land sparing versus sharing framework.

AB - We studied food security and biodiversity conservation from a social-ecological perspective in southwestern Ethiopia. Specialist tree, bird, and mammal species required large, undisturbed forest, supporting the notion of ‘land sparing’ for conservation. However, our findings also suggest that forest areas should be embedded within a multifunctional landscape matrix (i.e. ‘land sharing’), because farmland also supported many species and ecosystem services and was the basis of diversified livelihoods. Diversified livelihoods improved smallholder food security, while lack of access to capital assets and crop raiding by wild forest animals negatively influenced food security. Food and biodiversity governance lacked coordination and was strongly hierarchical, with relatively few stakeholders being highly powerful. Our study shows that issues of livelihoods, access to resources, governance and equity are central when resolving challenges around food security and biodiversity. A multi-facetted, social-ecological approach is better able to capture such complexity than the conventional, two-dimensional land sparing versus sharing framework.

KW - Agroecology

KW - transdisciplinarity

KW - land sharing

KW - land sparing

KW - resilience

KW - social-ecological systems

KW - sustainability science

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111496959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/26395916.2021.1952306

DO - 10.1080/26395916.2021.1952306

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 34396139

AN - SCOPUS:85111496959

VL - 17

SP - 400

EP - 410

JO - Ecosystems and People

JF - Ecosystems and People

SN - 2639-5908

IS - 1

ER -

Documents

DOI