Доверие и неопределённость: как возможна успешная коммуникация? Рецензия на книгу: Гамбетта Д. 2011. Коды криминального мира. Как общаются между собой преступники

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenRezensionenForschung

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{86ae42905adc4557ad444aee7df85574,
title = "Доверие и неопределённость: как возможна успешная коммуникация? Рецензия на книгу: Гамбетта Д. 2011. Коды криминального мира. Как общаются между собой преступники",
abstract = "This review is devoted to a description and analysis of the book by Diego Gambetta, Codes of the Underworld: How Criminals Communicate. The author studied elements of communicative action basing on signaling theory. In part, he continues the tradition of symbolic interactionism elaborated by Goffman. But, at the same time, he extends the concept “symbol” and narrows down contextual frames to situations of uncertainty and limited trust between agents. Gambetta also refers to economic theory and game theory to analyze and interpret actions of agents in this context. This review aims at a theoretical systematization and generalization of key findings.This review discusses several important issues that are essential to understand the main arguments and opinions of the book. First, Griaznova places the book into the context of Gambetta{\textquoteright}s previous publications. In this respect it is regarded as a significant step in the development of his core ideas of the mutual dependence of the volume of social “investment” in communication with the level of uncertainty and risk. Next, the review analyses in detail the content of the work. In particular, signaling theory, signal types and their empirical indicators are examined in turn. In the conclusion, the review considers the contribution of this research to the understanding of communication practices. Analysis of communication between criminals has a number of obvious advantages, but researchers face limits in studying this topic. On the one hand, a researcher would have an opportunity to put a communicative act into the context of higher uncertainty and trace the relationship between the level of risk and the amount of “investment”. However, on the other hand, a researcher is limited in choice of data collection method.",
keywords = "Sociology, criminal subculture, signaling theory, symbolic interactionism, mystification, communicative action, integration and cooperation, identification, a capital of violence, deviant behavior, uncertainty",
author = "Olga Griaznova",
year = "2015",
language = "Russian",
volume = "16",
pages = "80--89",
journal = "Journal of Economic Sociology",
issn = "1726-3247",
publisher = "National Research University Higher School of Economics",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Доверие и неопределённость: как возможна успешная коммуникация? Рецензия на книгу: Гамбетта Д. 2011. Коды криминального мира. Как общаются между собой преступники

AU - Griaznova, Olga

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This review is devoted to a description and analysis of the book by Diego Gambetta, Codes of the Underworld: How Criminals Communicate. The author studied elements of communicative action basing on signaling theory. In part, he continues the tradition of symbolic interactionism elaborated by Goffman. But, at the same time, he extends the concept “symbol” and narrows down contextual frames to situations of uncertainty and limited trust between agents. Gambetta also refers to economic theory and game theory to analyze and interpret actions of agents in this context. This review aims at a theoretical systematization and generalization of key findings.This review discusses several important issues that are essential to understand the main arguments and opinions of the book. First, Griaznova places the book into the context of Gambetta’s previous publications. In this respect it is regarded as a significant step in the development of his core ideas of the mutual dependence of the volume of social “investment” in communication with the level of uncertainty and risk. Next, the review analyses in detail the content of the work. In particular, signaling theory, signal types and their empirical indicators are examined in turn. In the conclusion, the review considers the contribution of this research to the understanding of communication practices. Analysis of communication between criminals has a number of obvious advantages, but researchers face limits in studying this topic. On the one hand, a researcher would have an opportunity to put a communicative act into the context of higher uncertainty and trace the relationship between the level of risk and the amount of “investment”. However, on the other hand, a researcher is limited in choice of data collection method.

AB - This review is devoted to a description and analysis of the book by Diego Gambetta, Codes of the Underworld: How Criminals Communicate. The author studied elements of communicative action basing on signaling theory. In part, he continues the tradition of symbolic interactionism elaborated by Goffman. But, at the same time, he extends the concept “symbol” and narrows down contextual frames to situations of uncertainty and limited trust between agents. Gambetta also refers to economic theory and game theory to analyze and interpret actions of agents in this context. This review aims at a theoretical systematization and generalization of key findings.This review discusses several important issues that are essential to understand the main arguments and opinions of the book. First, Griaznova places the book into the context of Gambetta’s previous publications. In this respect it is regarded as a significant step in the development of his core ideas of the mutual dependence of the volume of social “investment” in communication with the level of uncertainty and risk. Next, the review analyses in detail the content of the work. In particular, signaling theory, signal types and their empirical indicators are examined in turn. In the conclusion, the review considers the contribution of this research to the understanding of communication practices. Analysis of communication between criminals has a number of obvious advantages, but researchers face limits in studying this topic. On the one hand, a researcher would have an opportunity to put a communicative act into the context of higher uncertainty and trace the relationship between the level of risk and the amount of “investment”. However, on the other hand, a researcher is limited in choice of data collection method.

KW - Sociology

KW - criminal subculture

KW - signaling theory

KW - symbolic interactionism

KW - mystification

KW - communicative action

KW - integration and cooperation

KW - identification

KW - a capital of violence

KW - deviant behavior

KW - uncertainty

M3 - Rezensionen

VL - 16

SP - 80

EP - 89

JO - Journal of Economic Sociology

JF - Journal of Economic Sociology

SN - 1726-3247

IS - 2

ER -

Links