Financial penalties and the banking sector

Projekt: Forschung

Projektbeteiligte

Beschreibung

Since the financial crisis, the banking industry has been subjected to high financial penalties and increased scrutiny by regulatory agencies. On the one hand, several banking professionals assume that the number and the amount of penalties have lowered bank profitability to an extent that it has created uncertainty concerning the solvency and the business model of banks. On the other hand, several commentators have described the litigation costs as another cost of doing business. Banks with high litigation costs tend to conduct business in areas that are not clearly regulated, which allows them to generate abnormal gains. These abnormal gains may exceed the financial penalties. In addition, many national tax laws allow banks to deduct specific financial penalties from the taxable income, reducing the impact of initially imposed penalties. As a result, shareholders might not be too concerned about the imposed financial penalties.

However, the penalties have reached a dimension that caused the European Systemic Risk Board to issue warnings that the current and forecasted levels of financial penalties might pose systemic risks (European Systemic Risk Board, 2015). The Board’s report argued that the growing number and amount of financial penalties could increase public concerns with the regard to the business model and solvency of banks. In addition, banks may be encouraged to withdraw from specific financial markets, which could lead to adverse effects on the functioning of these markets (European Systemic Risk Board, 2015). Thus, regulators might prevent future misconduct by imposing financial penalties, though by doing so, they might also increase systemic fragility. If that were the case, imposing penalties would undermine their mission to protect the stability of the financial system.

Based on these observations, our research seeks to study the effect of financial penalties on the banking sector. Since only little is known about this matter, our findings help financial authorities, governments, bank managers, and investors to gain a better understanding of the implications of financial penalties on the banking sector.

To answer our research questions, we accumulate a unique dataset that contains hand-collected information on the amounts and the dates of individual bank fines and settlements between 2007 and 2014. The annual reports of banks have been criticized because they disclose the cost of financial penalties in a non-transparent manner, and there is no common internationally accepted standard for listing these items in reports. To obtain an estimate of financial penalties paid by each bank in a given year, we use different databases of regulatory authorities as well as business information providers and newspaper archives. To measure the banks’ systemic risk, we use the dynamic Marginal Expected Shortfall of Acharya et al. (2010) and Brownlees and Engle (2012) and the ΔCoVaR of Adrian and Brunnermeier (2016).

We find a negative relation between financial penalties and pre-tax profitability but no relation with after-tax profitability. This result is explained by tax savings, as banks are allowed to deduct specific financial penalties from their taxable income. Moreover, our empirical analysis of the stock performance shows a positive relation between financial penalties and buy-and-hold returns, indicating that investors are pleased that cases are closed, that the banks successfully manage the consequences of misconduct, and that the financial penalties imposed are smaller than the accrued economic gains from the banks’ misconduct. This argument is supported by the positive abnormal returns, which we detected on the announcement of a financial penalty. Finally, we obtain evidence for a significant negative relation between financial penalties and banks’ systemic risk exposure but not between financial penalties and banks’ systemic risk contribution. We also demonstrate that the characteristics of the regulatory and supervisory system of a given country affect the relation between financial penalties and banks’ systemic risk exposure. Our results contribute to the ongoing debate on the appropriateness of financial penalties and address the question whether bank regulators limit or contribute to banks’ systemic risk.
StatusAbgeschlossen
Zeitraum01.01.1601.01.18

Verknüpfte Publikationen

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Zweckscheinbarkeit
  2. Green and Sustainable Extraction of Proteins from Agro-industrial Waste
  3. Erratum to Perceived organizational support and intention to stay in host countries among self-initiated expatriates
  4. Neugermanistische Editoren im Wissenschaftskontext
  5. Doing transnational family im Kontext von Flucht und Krisenmigration. Stand der Forschung.
  6. Translation
  7. Online Peer-to-Peer Lending
  8. Der Seiteneinstieg – Neue Lehrkräfte bei der Eignungsabklärung unterstützen
  9. Predicting Therapy Success For Treatment as Usual and Blended Treatment in the Domain of Depression
  10. Ivano Alogna, Christine Bakker, Jean-Pierre Gauci (eds). Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2021. Pp. 543. ISBN: 9789004447608.
  11. Cultures of rejection at work
  12. Empirical evidence of the disclosure and assurance of Integrated Reporting -
  13. Friction Stir Welding of Various Aluminium Alloys to Titanium
  14. The influence of age and sex on speed–strength performance in children between 10 and 14 years of age
  15. Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss
  16. "I don't know anything about soccer" how personalweaknesses and strengths guide inferences aboutwomen's qualification in sex-typed jobs
  17. Continuous vs Thrice-Daily Ceftazidime for Elective Intravenous Antipseudomonal Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis
  18. Partnerships for Sustainable Business Development
  19. Land of Thorns
  20. The Life Cycle of Party Government across the New Europe
  21. Religion in Bestsellern
  22. Gute fachliche Praxis
  23. ludiCALL
  24. The sternum, spinal column and ilio-sacral joint
  25. Editorial
  26. Leseunterricht in der Grundschule
  27. Öffentliche Beschaffung nachhaltig gestalten