Why the future is democratic

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Why the future is democratic. / Welzel, Christian.

In: Journal of Democracy, Vol. 32, No. 2, 04.2021, p. 132-144.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Welzel C. Why the future is democratic. Journal of Democracy. 2021 Apr;32(2):132-144. doi: 10.1353/jod.2021.0024

Bibtex

@article{45c6d0729eec413185f81f28d9b00d20,
title = "Why the future is democratic",
abstract = "Recent accounts of democratic backsliding neglect the cultural foundations of autocracy-versus-democracy. To bring culture back in, this article demonstrates that 1) countries' membership in culture zones explains some 70 percent of the total cross-national variation in autocracy-versus-democracy; and 2) this culture-bound variation has remained astoundingly constant over time—in spite of all the trending patterns in the global distribution of regime types over the last 120 years. Furthermore, the explanatory power of culture zones over autocracy-versus-democracy is rooted in the cultures' differentiation on {"}authoritarian-versus-emancipative values.{"} Therefore, both the direction and the extent of regime change are a function of glacially accruing regime-culture misfits—driven by generational value shifts in a predominantly emancipatory direction. Consequently, the backsliding of democracies into authoritarianism is limited to societies in which emancipative values remain underdeveloped. Contrary to the widely cited deconsolidation thesis, the ascendant generational profile of emancipative values means that the momentary challenges to democracy are unlikely to stifle democracy's long-term rise.",
keywords = "Politics",
author = "Christian Welzel",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1353/jod.2021.0024",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "132--144",
journal = "Journal of Democracy",
issn = "1045-5736",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins Univ. Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why the future is democratic

AU - Welzel, Christian

PY - 2021/4

Y1 - 2021/4

N2 - Recent accounts of democratic backsliding neglect the cultural foundations of autocracy-versus-democracy. To bring culture back in, this article demonstrates that 1) countries' membership in culture zones explains some 70 percent of the total cross-national variation in autocracy-versus-democracy; and 2) this culture-bound variation has remained astoundingly constant over time—in spite of all the trending patterns in the global distribution of regime types over the last 120 years. Furthermore, the explanatory power of culture zones over autocracy-versus-democracy is rooted in the cultures' differentiation on "authoritarian-versus-emancipative values." Therefore, both the direction and the extent of regime change are a function of glacially accruing regime-culture misfits—driven by generational value shifts in a predominantly emancipatory direction. Consequently, the backsliding of democracies into authoritarianism is limited to societies in which emancipative values remain underdeveloped. Contrary to the widely cited deconsolidation thesis, the ascendant generational profile of emancipative values means that the momentary challenges to democracy are unlikely to stifle democracy's long-term rise.

AB - Recent accounts of democratic backsliding neglect the cultural foundations of autocracy-versus-democracy. To bring culture back in, this article demonstrates that 1) countries' membership in culture zones explains some 70 percent of the total cross-national variation in autocracy-versus-democracy; and 2) this culture-bound variation has remained astoundingly constant over time—in spite of all the trending patterns in the global distribution of regime types over the last 120 years. Furthermore, the explanatory power of culture zones over autocracy-versus-democracy is rooted in the cultures' differentiation on "authoritarian-versus-emancipative values." Therefore, both the direction and the extent of regime change are a function of glacially accruing regime-culture misfits—driven by generational value shifts in a predominantly emancipatory direction. Consequently, the backsliding of democracies into authoritarianism is limited to societies in which emancipative values remain underdeveloped. Contrary to the widely cited deconsolidation thesis, the ascendant generational profile of emancipative values means that the momentary challenges to democracy are unlikely to stifle democracy's long-term rise.

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106172883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/jod.2021.0024

DO - 10.1353/jod.2021.0024

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85106172883

VL - 32

SP - 132

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Democracy

JF - Journal of Democracy

SN - 1045-5736

IS - 2

ER -

DOI