Why the future is democratic

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Why the future is democratic. / Welzel, Christian.
In: Journal of Democracy, Vol. 32, No. 2, 04.2021, p. 132-144.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Welzel C. Why the future is democratic. Journal of Democracy. 2021 Apr;32(2):132-144. doi: 10.1353/jod.2021.0024

Bibtex

@article{45c6d0729eec413185f81f28d9b00d20,
title = "Why the future is democratic",
abstract = "Recent accounts of democratic backsliding neglect the cultural foundations of autocracy-versus-democracy. To bring culture back in, this article demonstrates that 1) countries' membership in culture zones explains some 70 percent of the total cross-national variation in autocracy-versus-democracy; and 2) this culture-bound variation has remained astoundingly constant over time—in spite of all the trending patterns in the global distribution of regime types over the last 120 years. Furthermore, the explanatory power of culture zones over autocracy-versus-democracy is rooted in the cultures' differentiation on {"}authoritarian-versus-emancipative values.{"} Therefore, both the direction and the extent of regime change are a function of glacially accruing regime-culture misfits—driven by generational value shifts in a predominantly emancipatory direction. Consequently, the backsliding of democracies into authoritarianism is limited to societies in which emancipative values remain underdeveloped. Contrary to the widely cited deconsolidation thesis, the ascendant generational profile of emancipative values means that the momentary challenges to democracy are unlikely to stifle democracy's long-term rise.",
keywords = "Politics",
author = "Christian Welzel",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1353/jod.2021.0024",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "132--144",
journal = "Journal of Democracy",
issn = "1045-5736",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why the future is democratic

AU - Welzel, Christian

PY - 2021/4

Y1 - 2021/4

N2 - Recent accounts of democratic backsliding neglect the cultural foundations of autocracy-versus-democracy. To bring culture back in, this article demonstrates that 1) countries' membership in culture zones explains some 70 percent of the total cross-national variation in autocracy-versus-democracy; and 2) this culture-bound variation has remained astoundingly constant over time—in spite of all the trending patterns in the global distribution of regime types over the last 120 years. Furthermore, the explanatory power of culture zones over autocracy-versus-democracy is rooted in the cultures' differentiation on "authoritarian-versus-emancipative values." Therefore, both the direction and the extent of regime change are a function of glacially accruing regime-culture misfits—driven by generational value shifts in a predominantly emancipatory direction. Consequently, the backsliding of democracies into authoritarianism is limited to societies in which emancipative values remain underdeveloped. Contrary to the widely cited deconsolidation thesis, the ascendant generational profile of emancipative values means that the momentary challenges to democracy are unlikely to stifle democracy's long-term rise.

AB - Recent accounts of democratic backsliding neglect the cultural foundations of autocracy-versus-democracy. To bring culture back in, this article demonstrates that 1) countries' membership in culture zones explains some 70 percent of the total cross-national variation in autocracy-versus-democracy; and 2) this culture-bound variation has remained astoundingly constant over time—in spite of all the trending patterns in the global distribution of regime types over the last 120 years. Furthermore, the explanatory power of culture zones over autocracy-versus-democracy is rooted in the cultures' differentiation on "authoritarian-versus-emancipative values." Therefore, both the direction and the extent of regime change are a function of glacially accruing regime-culture misfits—driven by generational value shifts in a predominantly emancipatory direction. Consequently, the backsliding of democracies into authoritarianism is limited to societies in which emancipative values remain underdeveloped. Contrary to the widely cited deconsolidation thesis, the ascendant generational profile of emancipative values means that the momentary challenges to democracy are unlikely to stifle democracy's long-term rise.

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106172883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/jod.2021.0024

DO - 10.1353/jod.2021.0024

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85106172883

VL - 32

SP - 132

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Democracy

JF - Journal of Democracy

SN - 1045-5736

IS - 2

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. On the micro-structure of the German export boom
  2. Sturheit siegt
  3. Vertical gradient in soil temperature stimulates development and increases biomass accumulation in barley
  4. Best Practise: Management-Informationssysteme (MIS) im Krankenhaus
  5. Pathways to Implementation: Evidence on How Participation in Environmental Governance Impacts on Environmental Outcomes
  6. From stories to maps
  7. Architektur analysieren
  8. Possibilities of imitation
  9. Teaching in times of COVID-19
  10. Explaining renewable energy consumption among students
  11. Fatigue life enhancement via residual stress engineering due to local forming during refill friction stir spot welding
  12. Circularity in Automotive Electronics Design
  13. A mixed-method approach to post-retirement career planning
  14. Assessing the added value of the recent declaration on unregulated fishing for sustainable governance of the central Arctic Ocean
  15. A new approach to semantic sustainability assessment
  16. Genetic Implications of Chemical and Textural Properties of Some Fra Mauro Breccias (Apollo 14)
  17. Investigation of hot workability behavior of as-cast Mg–5Sn–2Ca (TX52) magnesium alloy through processing map
  18. § 171
  19. Comparing Regulatory Designs for the Transmission of Offshore Wind Energy
  20. “The Learning Process Is Mutual”
  21. Aprender gramática online
  22. Die Scherengarnele
  23. Führung in Heterarchien
  24. Woody plant use and management in relation to property rights
  25. The need for pluralism in landscape models: a reply to Dunn and Majer
  26. Influence of Precipitation Hardening in Mg-Y-Nd on Mechanical and Corrosion Properties
  27. Property, personality rights and data protection with regard to biobanks - A layered system
  28. Promoting pro-environmental behavior through citizen science?
  29. The quantitative organization of speech
  30. Pragmatics as Social Inference About Intentional Action
  31. Effect of biaxial compressive stress state on the microstructure evolution and deformation compatibility of rolled sheet Mg alloy AZ31 at room temperature
  32. Exportaktivitäten
  33. § 112 VwGO (Urteilsfällung)
  34. Tri‐trophic interaction networks along a tree diversity gradient of BEF‐China
  35. From disagreements to dialogue
  36. The practice of ecological art