When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services: Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services : Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models. / Rieb, Jesse T.; Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca; Daily, Gretchen C. et al.

In: BioScience, Vol. 67, No. 9, 09.2017, p. 820-833.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

Rieb, JT, Chaplin-Kramer, R, Daily, GC, Armsworth, PR, Böhning-Gaese, K, Bonn, A, Cumming, GS, Eigenbrod, F, Grimm, V, Jackson, BM, Marques, A, Pattanayak, SK, Pereira, HM, Peterson, GD, Ricketts, TH, Robinson, BE, Schröter, M, Schulte, LA, Seppelt, R, Turner, MG & Bennett, EM 2017, 'When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services: Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models', BioScience, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 820-833. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix075

APA

Rieb, J. T., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daily, G. C., Armsworth, P. R., Böhning-Gaese, K., Bonn, A., Cumming, G. S., Eigenbrod, F., Grimm, V., Jackson, B. M., Marques, A., Pattanayak, S. K., Pereira, H. M., Peterson, G. D., Ricketts, T. H., Robinson, B. E., Schröter, M., Schulte, L. A., Seppelt, R., ... Bennett, E. M. (2017). When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services: Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models. BioScience, 67(9), 820-833. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix075

Vancouver

Rieb JT, Chaplin-Kramer R, Daily GC, Armsworth PR, Böhning-Gaese K, Bonn A et al. When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services: Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models. BioScience. 2017 Sep;67(9):820-833. doi: 10.1093/biosci/bix075

Bibtex

@article{2e57222120b545d2bf040215d53a2c2c,
title = "When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services: Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models",
abstract = "Many decision-makers are looking to science to clarify how nature supports human well-being. Scientists' responses have typically focused on empirical models of the provision of ecosystem services (ES) and resulting decision-support tools. Although such tools have captured some of the complexities of ES, they can be difficult to adapt to new situations. Globally useful tools that predict the provision of multiple ES under different decision scenarios have proven challenging to develop. Questions from decision-makers and limitations of existing decision-support tools indicate three crucial research frontiers for incorporating cutting-edge ES science into decision-support tools: (1) understanding the complex dynamics of ES in space and time, (2) linking ES provision to human well-being, and (3) determining the potential for technology to substitute for or enhance ES. We explore these frontiers in-depth, explaining why each is important and how existing knowledge at their cutting edges can be incorporated to improve ES decision-making tools.",
keywords = "decision-making, decision-support tools, ecosystem services, modeling, natural capital, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Rieb, {Jesse T.} and Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer and Daily, {Gretchen C.} and Armsworth, {Paul R.} and Katrin B{\"o}hning-Gaese and Aletta Bonn and Cumming, {Graeme S.} and Felix Eigenbrod and Volker Grimm and Jackson, {Bethanna M.} and Alexandra Marques and Pattanayak, {Subhrendu K.} and Pereira, {Henrique M.} and Peterson, {Garry D.} and Ricketts, {Taylor H.} and Robinson, {Brian E.} and Matthias Schr{\"o}ter and Schulte, {Lisa A.} and Ralf Seppelt and Turner, {Monica G.} and Bennett, {Elena M.}",
note = "This article is a joint effort of the working group “sESMOD— Next-Generation Models for Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity” and an outcome of a workshop kindly supported by the Synthesis Centre (sDiv) of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig (DFG FZT 118). Jesse T. Rieb and Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer contributed equally to this work.",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1093/biosci/bix075",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "820--833",
journal = "BioScience",
issn = "0006-3568",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services

T2 - Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models

AU - Rieb, Jesse T.

AU - Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca

AU - Daily, Gretchen C.

AU - Armsworth, Paul R.

AU - Böhning-Gaese, Katrin

AU - Bonn, Aletta

AU - Cumming, Graeme S.

AU - Eigenbrod, Felix

AU - Grimm, Volker

AU - Jackson, Bethanna M.

AU - Marques, Alexandra

AU - Pattanayak, Subhrendu K.

AU - Pereira, Henrique M.

AU - Peterson, Garry D.

AU - Ricketts, Taylor H.

AU - Robinson, Brian E.

AU - Schröter, Matthias

AU - Schulte, Lisa A.

AU - Seppelt, Ralf

AU - Turner, Monica G.

AU - Bennett, Elena M.

N1 - This article is a joint effort of the working group “sESMOD— Next-Generation Models for Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity” and an outcome of a workshop kindly supported by the Synthesis Centre (sDiv) of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig (DFG FZT 118). Jesse T. Rieb and Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer contributed equally to this work.

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Many decision-makers are looking to science to clarify how nature supports human well-being. Scientists' responses have typically focused on empirical models of the provision of ecosystem services (ES) and resulting decision-support tools. Although such tools have captured some of the complexities of ES, they can be difficult to adapt to new situations. Globally useful tools that predict the provision of multiple ES under different decision scenarios have proven challenging to develop. Questions from decision-makers and limitations of existing decision-support tools indicate three crucial research frontiers for incorporating cutting-edge ES science into decision-support tools: (1) understanding the complex dynamics of ES in space and time, (2) linking ES provision to human well-being, and (3) determining the potential for technology to substitute for or enhance ES. We explore these frontiers in-depth, explaining why each is important and how existing knowledge at their cutting edges can be incorporated to improve ES decision-making tools.

AB - Many decision-makers are looking to science to clarify how nature supports human well-being. Scientists' responses have typically focused on empirical models of the provision of ecosystem services (ES) and resulting decision-support tools. Although such tools have captured some of the complexities of ES, they can be difficult to adapt to new situations. Globally useful tools that predict the provision of multiple ES under different decision scenarios have proven challenging to develop. Questions from decision-makers and limitations of existing decision-support tools indicate three crucial research frontiers for incorporating cutting-edge ES science into decision-support tools: (1) understanding the complex dynamics of ES in space and time, (2) linking ES provision to human well-being, and (3) determining the potential for technology to substitute for or enhance ES. We explore these frontiers in-depth, explaining why each is important and how existing knowledge at their cutting edges can be incorporated to improve ES decision-making tools.

KW - decision-making

KW - decision-support tools

KW - ecosystem services

KW - modeling

KW - natural capital

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029689597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/01caf683-9509-3173-aa7f-129a802bd1f6/

U2 - 10.1093/biosci/bix075

DO - 10.1093/biosci/bix075

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:85029689597

VL - 67

SP - 820

EP - 833

JO - BioScience

JF - BioScience

SN - 0006-3568

IS - 9

ER -

DOI