What Provides Justification for Cheating-Producing or Observing Counterfactuals?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

What Provides Justification for Cheating-Producing or Observing Counterfactuals? / Bassarak, Claudia; Leib, Margarita; Mischkowski, Dorothee et al.
In: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 30, No. 4, 10.2017, p. 964-975.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bassarak C, Leib M, Mischkowski D, Strang S, Glöckner A, Shalvi S. What Provides Justification for Cheating-Producing or Observing Counterfactuals? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2017 Oct;30(4):964-975. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2013

Bibtex

@article{38b9b8dfe407421e92a018e753393b2a,
title = "What Provides Justification for Cheating-Producing or Observing Counterfactuals?",
abstract = "When people can profit financially by lying, they do so to the extent to which they can justify their lies. One type of justification is the observation and production of desirable counterfactual information. Here, we disentangle observing and producing of desired counterfactuals and test whether the mere observation is sufficient or whether one actually needs to produce the information in order to justify lying. By employing a modified version of the Die-Under-Cup task, we ask participants to privately roll a die three times and to report the outcome of the first die roll (with higher values corresponding to higher payoffs). In all three conditions, participants produce (roll the die) and observe the first die roll, which is relevant for pay. We manipulate whether participants produce and observe versus only observe the second and third die roll outcomes, which are both irrelevant for pay. Results reveal that people lie to the same extent-when producing and observing the counterfactuals, and when merely observing them. It seems that merely observing counterfactual information is sufficient to allow people to use this information to justify their lies. We further test whether creativity and moral disengagement are associated with dishonesty and replicate the finding showing that unethical behavior increases with creativity.",
keywords = "Psychology, Behavioral ethics, Cheating, Lying, Observing counterfactuals, Producing counterfactuals",
author = "Claudia Bassarak and Margarita Leib and Dorothee Mischkowski and Sabrina Strang and Andreas Gl{\"o}ckner and Shaul Shalvi",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1002/bdm.2013",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "964--975",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Decision Making",
issn = "0894-3257",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Provides Justification for Cheating-Producing or Observing Counterfactuals?

AU - Bassarak, Claudia

AU - Leib, Margarita

AU - Mischkowski, Dorothee

AU - Strang, Sabrina

AU - Glöckner, Andreas

AU - Shalvi, Shaul

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - When people can profit financially by lying, they do so to the extent to which they can justify their lies. One type of justification is the observation and production of desirable counterfactual information. Here, we disentangle observing and producing of desired counterfactuals and test whether the mere observation is sufficient or whether one actually needs to produce the information in order to justify lying. By employing a modified version of the Die-Under-Cup task, we ask participants to privately roll a die three times and to report the outcome of the first die roll (with higher values corresponding to higher payoffs). In all three conditions, participants produce (roll the die) and observe the first die roll, which is relevant for pay. We manipulate whether participants produce and observe versus only observe the second and third die roll outcomes, which are both irrelevant for pay. Results reveal that people lie to the same extent-when producing and observing the counterfactuals, and when merely observing them. It seems that merely observing counterfactual information is sufficient to allow people to use this information to justify their lies. We further test whether creativity and moral disengagement are associated with dishonesty and replicate the finding showing that unethical behavior increases with creativity.

AB - When people can profit financially by lying, they do so to the extent to which they can justify their lies. One type of justification is the observation and production of desirable counterfactual information. Here, we disentangle observing and producing of desired counterfactuals and test whether the mere observation is sufficient or whether one actually needs to produce the information in order to justify lying. By employing a modified version of the Die-Under-Cup task, we ask participants to privately roll a die three times and to report the outcome of the first die roll (with higher values corresponding to higher payoffs). In all three conditions, participants produce (roll the die) and observe the first die roll, which is relevant for pay. We manipulate whether participants produce and observe versus only observe the second and third die roll outcomes, which are both irrelevant for pay. Results reveal that people lie to the same extent-when producing and observing the counterfactuals, and when merely observing them. It seems that merely observing counterfactual information is sufficient to allow people to use this information to justify their lies. We further test whether creativity and moral disengagement are associated with dishonesty and replicate the finding showing that unethical behavior increases with creativity.

KW - Psychology

KW - Behavioral ethics

KW - Cheating

KW - Lying

KW - Observing counterfactuals

KW - Producing counterfactuals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018877393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3db55b7c-ce2b-3a8f-9951-c71ffc82d17f/

U2 - 10.1002/bdm.2013

DO - 10.1002/bdm.2013

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85018877393

VL - 30

SP - 964

EP - 975

JO - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

JF - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

SN - 0894-3257

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Optimising Patterns of Life Conduct
  2. Debattieren im Unterricht
  3. Fun and Military Games
  4. Concepts and Instruments for Facing the Challenges of Corporate Sustainability Management
  5. Multiscale analysis of thermoregulation in the human microvascular system
  6. A leverage points perspective on social networks to understand sustainability transformations
  7. Jonathan Swift, A modest proposal for preventing the children of poor people of Ireland from beeing a burden to their parents or the country, and for making them beneficial to the public
  8. Calendar
  9. Study Protocol
  10. Five priorities to advance transformative transdisciplinary research
  11. QALD-9-ES: A Spanish Dataset for Question Answering Systems
  12. Between morality and the law
  13. The Efficacy of a Web-Based Stress Management Intervention for Employees Experiencing Adverse Working Conditions and Occupational Self-efficacy as a Mediator
  14. Organizational Wrongdoing, Boundary Work, and Systems of Exclusion
  15. Das Alltagsmedium Blatt
  16. Participation for effective environmental governance? Evidence from Water Framework Directive implementation in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom
  17. Digitalisierung in der Strahlentherapie 4.0
  18. Consumer Online Search Behavior
  19. Projektmentoring mit Schülerinnen-Roboterbau
  20. Das Unvermeidliche vermeiden
  21. Putting the Instructional Leadership-Student Achievement Relation in Context
  22. Uncharted risk measures for the management of sustainable mining
  23. In the Eye of the Beholder
  24. Fat or lean
  25. The diffusion of sustainable family farming practices in Colombia
  26. Benchmarking nesting aids for cavity-nesting bees and wasps
  27. Mentoring in Massive Open Online Courses - Eine Nutzenanalyse auf Basis des IS-Success-Modells
  28. Article 31 Application in Time