What Provides Justification for Cheating-Producing or Observing Counterfactuals?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

What Provides Justification for Cheating-Producing or Observing Counterfactuals? / Bassarak, Claudia; Leib, Margarita; Mischkowski, Dorothee et al.
In: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 30, No. 4, 10.2017, p. 964-975.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bassarak C, Leib M, Mischkowski D, Strang S, Glöckner A, Shalvi S. What Provides Justification for Cheating-Producing or Observing Counterfactuals? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2017 Oct;30(4):964-975. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2013

Bibtex

@article{38b9b8dfe407421e92a018e753393b2a,
title = "What Provides Justification for Cheating-Producing or Observing Counterfactuals?",
abstract = "When people can profit financially by lying, they do so to the extent to which they can justify their lies. One type of justification is the observation and production of desirable counterfactual information. Here, we disentangle observing and producing of desired counterfactuals and test whether the mere observation is sufficient or whether one actually needs to produce the information in order to justify lying. By employing a modified version of the Die-Under-Cup task, we ask participants to privately roll a die three times and to report the outcome of the first die roll (with higher values corresponding to higher payoffs). In all three conditions, participants produce (roll the die) and observe the first die roll, which is relevant for pay. We manipulate whether participants produce and observe versus only observe the second and third die roll outcomes, which are both irrelevant for pay. Results reveal that people lie to the same extent-when producing and observing the counterfactuals, and when merely observing them. It seems that merely observing counterfactual information is sufficient to allow people to use this information to justify their lies. We further test whether creativity and moral disengagement are associated with dishonesty and replicate the finding showing that unethical behavior increases with creativity.",
keywords = "Psychology, Behavioral ethics, Cheating, Lying, Observing counterfactuals, Producing counterfactuals",
author = "Claudia Bassarak and Margarita Leib and Dorothee Mischkowski and Sabrina Strang and Andreas Gl{\"o}ckner and Shaul Shalvi",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1002/bdm.2013",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "964--975",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Decision Making",
issn = "0894-3257",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Provides Justification for Cheating-Producing or Observing Counterfactuals?

AU - Bassarak, Claudia

AU - Leib, Margarita

AU - Mischkowski, Dorothee

AU - Strang, Sabrina

AU - Glöckner, Andreas

AU - Shalvi, Shaul

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - When people can profit financially by lying, they do so to the extent to which they can justify their lies. One type of justification is the observation and production of desirable counterfactual information. Here, we disentangle observing and producing of desired counterfactuals and test whether the mere observation is sufficient or whether one actually needs to produce the information in order to justify lying. By employing a modified version of the Die-Under-Cup task, we ask participants to privately roll a die three times and to report the outcome of the first die roll (with higher values corresponding to higher payoffs). In all three conditions, participants produce (roll the die) and observe the first die roll, which is relevant for pay. We manipulate whether participants produce and observe versus only observe the second and third die roll outcomes, which are both irrelevant for pay. Results reveal that people lie to the same extent-when producing and observing the counterfactuals, and when merely observing them. It seems that merely observing counterfactual information is sufficient to allow people to use this information to justify their lies. We further test whether creativity and moral disengagement are associated with dishonesty and replicate the finding showing that unethical behavior increases with creativity.

AB - When people can profit financially by lying, they do so to the extent to which they can justify their lies. One type of justification is the observation and production of desirable counterfactual information. Here, we disentangle observing and producing of desired counterfactuals and test whether the mere observation is sufficient or whether one actually needs to produce the information in order to justify lying. By employing a modified version of the Die-Under-Cup task, we ask participants to privately roll a die three times and to report the outcome of the first die roll (with higher values corresponding to higher payoffs). In all three conditions, participants produce (roll the die) and observe the first die roll, which is relevant for pay. We manipulate whether participants produce and observe versus only observe the second and third die roll outcomes, which are both irrelevant for pay. Results reveal that people lie to the same extent-when producing and observing the counterfactuals, and when merely observing them. It seems that merely observing counterfactual information is sufficient to allow people to use this information to justify their lies. We further test whether creativity and moral disengagement are associated with dishonesty and replicate the finding showing that unethical behavior increases with creativity.

KW - Psychology

KW - Behavioral ethics

KW - Cheating

KW - Lying

KW - Observing counterfactuals

KW - Producing counterfactuals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018877393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3db55b7c-ce2b-3a8f-9951-c71ffc82d17f/

U2 - 10.1002/bdm.2013

DO - 10.1002/bdm.2013

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85018877393

VL - 30

SP - 964

EP - 975

JO - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

JF - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

SN - 0894-3257

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Spectra of the planar Multipole Resonance Probe determined by a Kinetic Model
  2. Prozessoptimierung macht stark
  3. Observations of Microstructure-Oriented Crack Growth in a Cast Mg-Al-Ba-Ca Alloy under Tension, Compression and Fatigue
  4. Impacts of software and its engineering on the carbon footprint of ICT
  5. Context in natural-language communication
  6. Mehrsprachigkeit und Interkulturalität in Fremdsprachenportfolios
  7. A Reference Model for Data-driven Business Model Innovation Initiatives in Incumbent Firms
  8. Multiplexed supply of a MISO wireless power transfer system for battery-free wireless sensors
  9. Scenario modeling of ammonia emissions from surface applied urea under temperate conditions
  10. Aufgaben 2.0
  11. Moving Around Myanmar
  12. Comparing self-reported and O*NET-based assessments of job control as predictors of self-rated health for non-Hispanic whites and racial/ethnic minorities
  13. Methodology for Integrating Biomimetic Beams in Abstracted Topology Optimization Results
  14. Scoping Review of Existing Evaluations of Smokeless Tobacco Control Policies
  15. Sufficiency as relations of enoughness
  16. Forced Migrants as ‘Illegal’ Migrants
  17. Visualizations of projected rainfall change in the United Kingdom
  18. Participation as a Mode of Conflict
  19. Das Schreiben, das Interpretieren, die Tatsachen
  20. Rule-based analysis of throughfall kinetic energy to evaluate biotic and abiotic factor thresholds to mitigate erosive power
  21. Impact of anthropogenic input on physicochemical parameters and trace metals in marine surface sediments of Bay of Bengal off Chennai, India
  22. Integrativ managen
  23. Terry Erwin’s legacy
  24. Power and Policies in and by the Arts - Introduction
  25. Risk Aversion and Worker Sorting into Public Sector Employment
  26. Accumulation and Subjectivity