What matters for work engagement? A diary study on resources and the benefits of selective optimization with compensation for state work engagement

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

This diary study addresses the benefits of employees' daily use of selective optimization with compensation (SOC) for state work engagement. We hypothesized that day-level SOC not only directly fosters work engagement but that SOC also reveals its beneficial effects for work engagement in interaction with both external and internal resources. Specifically, we proposed SOC substitutes for job control, role clarity, and state of being recovered, thus helping employees manage low daily levels of these resources. We tested our hypotheses with a sample of 138 employees who completed two daily surveys over a total of 545 workdays. Results of multilevel analyses revealed that SOC benefits work engagement in both proposed ways. First, day-level SOC was positively related to state work engagement. Additionally, day-level role clarity and state of being recovered predicted state work engagement, but day-level job control did not. Second, SOC benefitted state work engagement by offsetting low levels of role clarity and being recovered, and by boosting job control in their respective relationships with work engagement. The results suggest that by using SOC at work, employees can actively enhance their own work engagement on a given workday. This knowledge provides promising starting points for the development of interventions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume39
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)26-38
Number of pages13
ISSN0894-3796
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2018
Externally publishedYes

    Research areas

  • diary study, resources, selective optimization with compensation, work engagement
  • Business psychology

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Fallstudie
  2. Normal Development
  3. The new European database for chemicals of concern
  4. Front in the mouth, front in the word
  5. Am Jenseits
  6. What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest?
  7. Attracting attention from peers
  8. Laser shock peening process modelling and experimental validation of AA2198-T3 and AA2198-T8
  9. Dialectical conditions
  10. Sampling
  11. Initiative in work teams
  12. Fallstudie
  13. Erratum to 5 Development of competencies across the life span
  14. What do we know about new venture investment time patterns?
  15. It’s All Method
  16. Effectiveness of an Internet- and App-Based Intervention for College Students With Elevated Stress
  17. The impact of key audit matter (KAM) disclosure in audit reports on stakeholders’ reactions
  18. Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung
  19. Calling and career preparation
  20. Edward Lear, A book of nonsense
  21. Modeling Turning Points In Global Equity Market
  22. Performativity, performance studies and digital cultures
  23. Future work
  24. Changing learning environments at university?
  25. Explaining age and gender differences in employment rates
  26. Mechanisms behind elevational plant species richness patterns revealed by a trait-based approach
  27. 2D QSAR of PPARγ agonist binding and transactivation.
  28. Komparative studier i børnelitterature
  29. The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management
  30. Die Unterwerfung
  31. A new and benign hegemon on the horizon?
  32. A target costing approach to developing an online distribution channel
  33. Radicalisation of ‘lone actors’
  34. Healthier and Sustainable Food Systems: Integrating Underutilised Crops in a ‘Theory of Change Approach’