Values shift in response to social learning through deliberation about protected areas

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Riley Andrade
  • Carena J. van Riper
  • Devin J. Goodson
  • Dana N. Johnson
  • William Stewart
  • María D. López-Rodríguez
  • Miguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras
  • Andra Ioana Horcea-Milcu
  • Veronica Lo
  • Christopher M. Raymond

Salient, long-term solutions to address global environmental change hinge on management strategies that are inclusive of local voices and that recognize the array of values held by surrounding communities. Group-based participatory processes that involve deliberation of multiple stakeholders with varying perspectives—particularly social learning—hold promise to advance inclusive conservation by identifying and creating a shared understanding of the landscape. However, few studies have empirically investigated how the value basis of stakeholder deliberation changes over time in relation to social learning. This study provided a novel platform for local stakeholders from Interior Alaska to deliberate on landscape change and associated management practices in ways that shifted their value orientations. In particular, we used a pre-test, post-test experimental design involving mixed methods to measure how different types of values changed as a result of social learning through an online discussion forum. We found evidence that social learning: 1) activated shared values that were previously hidden through building a relational understanding of others, and 2) shifted values that spanned three levels of psychological stability. As hypothesized, social values that represented expressed preferences for landscape change were most likely to shift in association with social learning. Conversely, shifts in individual values towards self-transcendence required learning to go beyond the discussion forum and be situated within the participants’ broader communities of practice. Overall, this longitudinal study highlights how social learning facilitated through deliberation presents opportunities to identify shared values and spark value shifts across stakeholder groups, thus incorporating diverse viewpoints into decision-making about global environmental change.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102630
JournalGlobal Environmental Change
Volume78
Number of pages12
ISSN0959-3780
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Impact of different methods of heathland management on the nutrient balance and vegetation dynamics
  2. Current Trends in Environmental Cost Accounting - and its Interaction with Eco-Efficiency Performance Measurement and Indicators
  3. Evaluating a hybrid web-based training program for panic disorder and agoraphobia
  4. Excludable and non-excludable public inputs
  5. Visualizing stakeholders’ willingness for collective action in participatory scenario planning
  6. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability
  7. Navigating AI and children's rights in corporate practices
  8. Analysis of life cycle datasets for the material gold
  9. Species loss due to nutrient addition increases with spatial scale in global grasslands
  10. Why context matters: Understanding transdisciplinary research through the lens of nine context factors
  11. Structure and dynamics of secondary and mature rainforests
  12. Application of the two-sample doubly labelled water method alters behaviour and affects estimates of energy expenditure in black-legged kittiwakes
  13. Diversity lost
  14. Process characteristics of constrained friction processing of AM50 magnesium alloy
  15. Adaptive learning support as a key element of innovative teaching in Germany
  16. Variable social-ecological indicators across a Tanzanian protected area network
  17. On the impact of network size and average degree on the robustness of centrality measures
  18. Beschreibende Statistik
  19. Reviewing relational values for future research
  20. Nichtlineare Dynamik
  21. Using a leverage points perspective to compare social-ecological systems: a case study on rural landscapes