Unholy Affinity? – Free Trade Theory, Postmodernism, and the Multinational Enterprise

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Unholy Affinity? – Free Trade Theory, Postmodernism, and the Multinational Enterprise. / Scherer, Andreas Georg; McKinley, William.
Internationales Management im Umbruch: Globalisierungsbedingte Einwirkungen auf Theorie und Praxis internationaler Unternehmensführung. ed. / Michael-Jörg Oesterle. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, 2007. p. 65-84.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Scherer, AG & McKinley, W 2007, Unholy Affinity? – Free Trade Theory, Postmodernism, and the Multinational Enterprise. in M-J Oesterle (ed.), Internationales Management im Umbruch: Globalisierungsbedingte Einwirkungen auf Theorie und Praxis internationaler Unternehmensführung. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9378-2_3

APA

Scherer, A. G., & McKinley, W. (2007). Unholy Affinity? – Free Trade Theory, Postmodernism, and the Multinational Enterprise. In M.-J. Oesterle (Ed.), Internationales Management im Umbruch: Globalisierungsbedingte Einwirkungen auf Theorie und Praxis internationaler Unternehmensführung (pp. 65-84). Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9378-2_3

Vancouver

Scherer AG, McKinley W. Unholy Affinity? – Free Trade Theory, Postmodernism, and the Multinational Enterprise. In Oesterle MJ, editor, Internationales Management im Umbruch: Globalisierungsbedingte Einwirkungen auf Theorie und Praxis internationaler Unternehmensführung. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag. 2007. p. 65-84 doi: 10.1007/978-3-8350-9378-2_3

Bibtex

@inbook{7204faa8db4d41ca88125501ec1a76d9,
title = "Unholy Affinity? – Free Trade Theory, Postmodernism, and the Multinational Enterprise",
abstract = "Globalization can be seen as a process of worldwide interlinkage of social actions, which transcends local contexts and institutions and thus increases in importance beyond the regional level (Giddens 1990; Scherer 2003; Scherer/Palazzo 2008). This is particularly true in the case of economic activity. In globalization, doing business crosses territorially defined borders, leading to a mismatch between political control on the one hand and economic activity on the other. The congruence between the area covered by state regulation and the area where economic and social interaction actually unfold thus disappears (Z{\"u}rn 1998). Under these conditions the private economy no longer develops within the rules dictated by state politics; rather, the economy is likely to dictate to politicians (Gray 1999; H{\"o}ffe 1999).",
keywords = "Management studies",
author = "Scherer, {Andreas Georg} and William McKinley",
year = "2007",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-8350-9378-2_3",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-8350-0542-6",
pages = "65--84",
editor = "Michael-J{\"o}rg Oesterle",
booktitle = "Internationales Management im Umbruch",
publisher = "Deutscher Universit{\"a}ts-Verlag",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Unholy Affinity? – Free Trade Theory, Postmodernism, and the Multinational Enterprise

AU - Scherer, Andreas Georg

AU - McKinley, William

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Globalization can be seen as a process of worldwide interlinkage of social actions, which transcends local contexts and institutions and thus increases in importance beyond the regional level (Giddens 1990; Scherer 2003; Scherer/Palazzo 2008). This is particularly true in the case of economic activity. In globalization, doing business crosses territorially defined borders, leading to a mismatch between political control on the one hand and economic activity on the other. The congruence between the area covered by state regulation and the area where economic and social interaction actually unfold thus disappears (Zürn 1998). Under these conditions the private economy no longer develops within the rules dictated by state politics; rather, the economy is likely to dictate to politicians (Gray 1999; Höffe 1999).

AB - Globalization can be seen as a process of worldwide interlinkage of social actions, which transcends local contexts and institutions and thus increases in importance beyond the regional level (Giddens 1990; Scherer 2003; Scherer/Palazzo 2008). This is particularly true in the case of economic activity. In globalization, doing business crosses territorially defined borders, leading to a mismatch between political control on the one hand and economic activity on the other. The congruence between the area covered by state regulation and the area where economic and social interaction actually unfold thus disappears (Zürn 1998). Under these conditions the private economy no longer develops within the rules dictated by state politics; rather, the economy is likely to dictate to politicians (Gray 1999; Höffe 1999).

KW - Management studies

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/17eda422-254d-3905-bd57-ecc00a6bed6a/

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-8350-9378-2_3

DO - 10.1007/978-3-8350-9378-2_3

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 978-3-8350-0542-6

SP - 65

EP - 84

BT - Internationales Management im Umbruch

A2 - Oesterle, Michael-Jörg

PB - Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag

CY - Wiesbaden

ER -