Understanding needs embodiment: A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Understanding needs embodiment: A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. / Niebert, K.; Marsch, S.; Treagust, D.F.
In: Science Education, Vol. 96, No. 5, 01.09.2012, p. 849-877.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{280107a77c4c45b78b3e4d8d7724965d,
title = "Understanding needs embodiment: A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science",
abstract = "Many authors stress the importance of basing teaching on students' prior knowledge. To build a bridge between students' everyday knowledge and scientific concepts, the role of metaphors and analogies came into the focus of the science education community during the past two decades. Approaches using metaphor-based teaching strategies often regard metaphors and analogies as teaching tools that can be adopted by a teacher. On the basis of the theoretical framework of experientialism, we argue that not only teaching but also thinking about and understanding science without metaphors and analogies is not possible. An analysis of studies dealing with metaphors and analogies in science education shows that instructional analogies and metaphors are often not understood as intended or not used by students in their own explanations. By reanalyzing 199 instructional metaphors and analogies on the basis of a metaphor analysis, we show that it takes more than making a connection to everyday life to communicate science fruitfully. We show that good instructional metaphors and analogies need embodied sources. These embodied sources are everyday experiences conceptualized in, for example, schemata such as containers, paths, balances, and up and down. For the analysis, we introduce the concept of conceptual metaphors for analyzing metaphors as well as analogies.",
keywords = "Didactics/teaching methodology",
author = "K. Niebert and S. Marsch and D.F. Treagust",
year = "2012",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/sce.21026",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "849--877",
journal = "Science Education",
issn = "0036-8326",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding needs embodiment

T2 - A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science

AU - Niebert, K.

AU - Marsch, S.

AU - Treagust, D.F.

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Many authors stress the importance of basing teaching on students' prior knowledge. To build a bridge between students' everyday knowledge and scientific concepts, the role of metaphors and analogies came into the focus of the science education community during the past two decades. Approaches using metaphor-based teaching strategies often regard metaphors and analogies as teaching tools that can be adopted by a teacher. On the basis of the theoretical framework of experientialism, we argue that not only teaching but also thinking about and understanding science without metaphors and analogies is not possible. An analysis of studies dealing with metaphors and analogies in science education shows that instructional analogies and metaphors are often not understood as intended or not used by students in their own explanations. By reanalyzing 199 instructional metaphors and analogies on the basis of a metaphor analysis, we show that it takes more than making a connection to everyday life to communicate science fruitfully. We show that good instructional metaphors and analogies need embodied sources. These embodied sources are everyday experiences conceptualized in, for example, schemata such as containers, paths, balances, and up and down. For the analysis, we introduce the concept of conceptual metaphors for analyzing metaphors as well as analogies.

AB - Many authors stress the importance of basing teaching on students' prior knowledge. To build a bridge between students' everyday knowledge and scientific concepts, the role of metaphors and analogies came into the focus of the science education community during the past two decades. Approaches using metaphor-based teaching strategies often regard metaphors and analogies as teaching tools that can be adopted by a teacher. On the basis of the theoretical framework of experientialism, we argue that not only teaching but also thinking about and understanding science without metaphors and analogies is not possible. An analysis of studies dealing with metaphors and analogies in science education shows that instructional analogies and metaphors are often not understood as intended or not used by students in their own explanations. By reanalyzing 199 instructional metaphors and analogies on the basis of a metaphor analysis, we show that it takes more than making a connection to everyday life to communicate science fruitfully. We show that good instructional metaphors and analogies need embodied sources. These embodied sources are everyday experiences conceptualized in, for example, schemata such as containers, paths, balances, and up and down. For the analysis, we introduce the concept of conceptual metaphors for analyzing metaphors as well as analogies.

KW - Didactics/teaching methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865064377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sce.21026

DO - 10.1002/sce.21026

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84865064377

VL - 96

SP - 849

EP - 877

JO - Science Education

JF - Science Education

SN - 0036-8326

IS - 5

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Josefine Laudan

Activities

  1. Friction hysteresis compensation using phase correction of periodic trajectories
  2. Applied Vegetation Science (Zeitschrift)
  3. Describing consumer competence: A transdisciplinary approach
  4. The Impact of Television Program on Individual Action for Climate Protection regarding Adolescents in Germany
  5. The EU’s Governance Transfer. From External Promotion to Internal Protection?
  6. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (Organisation)
  7. Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science - AAAS 2012
  8. Linking stakeholder participation and environmental outcomes: In search of evidence
  9. Gutachten Tenure Track
  10. Internationale Konferenz: End of Messages? The State of the Dialogue between History and Sociology - 2009
  11. Arbeiten und Leben in Uelzen
  12. DFG-Kolleg-Forschergruppe MECS (Medienkulturen der Computersimulation) (Organisation)
  13. Global Studies Quarterly (Fachzeitschrift)
  14. BISE (Business & Information System Engineering) (Zeitschrift)
  15. Workshop "Informatik und die Digital Humanities" 2014
  16. 1st Conference of the Energy and Society Network 2012
  17. Volunteer Services in the Global South and their Impact on Diversity Education
  18. Bilder im Prozess: Sachverständige Systeme um 1900
  19. Agri-food globalisation and governance for environmental sustainability: Challenges and opportunities of a global commodity chains approach
  20. Fakultät Management und Technologie (Organisation)
  21. Artist/Curator Talk: Park McArthur and Christopher Weickenmeier
  22. Wie kommt das Neue in die Welt?
  23. International Migration (Fachzeitschrift)