The debate on nuclear energy for sustainability: A comment

Research output: Journal contributionsComments / Debate / ReportsResearch

Standard

The debate on nuclear energy for sustainability: A comment. / Engler, John Oliver; von Wehrden, Henrik.
In: GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, Vol. 32, No. 3, 27.10.2023, p. 287-291.

Research output: Journal contributionsComments / Debate / ReportsResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ffab0e95d08d42b2b0175b56218f3b13,
title = "The debate on nuclear energy for sustainability: A comment",
abstract = "The role of nuclear energy to cut down on greenhouse gas emissions continues to be a contentious issue in many countries. Public debate is often convoluted and largely revolves around price and costs of energy production technologies as well as their contribution to climate change. Here, we first dissect two interwoven factors bound to produce confusion in the price-cost debate: temporal discounting and external costs. We then explore how a stronger focus on risk ethics could contribute to the debate on nuclear energy for sustainability.",
keywords = "energy production, nuclear power, risk ethics, sustainable energy, Sustainability Science, Sustainability sciences, Communication",
author = "Engler, {John Oliver} and {von Wehrden}, Henrik",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 by the authors; licensee oekom. This Open Access article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).",
year = "2023",
month = oct,
day = "27",
doi = "10.14512/GAIA.32.3.4",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "287--291",
journal = "GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society",
issn = "0940-5550",
publisher = "Oekom - Gesellschaft fuer Oekologische Kommunikation mbH",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The debate on nuclear energy for sustainability

T2 - A comment

AU - Engler, John Oliver

AU - von Wehrden, Henrik

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors; licensee oekom. This Open Access article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).

PY - 2023/10/27

Y1 - 2023/10/27

N2 - The role of nuclear energy to cut down on greenhouse gas emissions continues to be a contentious issue in many countries. Public debate is often convoluted and largely revolves around price and costs of energy production technologies as well as their contribution to climate change. Here, we first dissect two interwoven factors bound to produce confusion in the price-cost debate: temporal discounting and external costs. We then explore how a stronger focus on risk ethics could contribute to the debate on nuclear energy for sustainability.

AB - The role of nuclear energy to cut down on greenhouse gas emissions continues to be a contentious issue in many countries. Public debate is often convoluted and largely revolves around price and costs of energy production technologies as well as their contribution to climate change. Here, we first dissect two interwoven factors bound to produce confusion in the price-cost debate: temporal discounting and external costs. We then explore how a stronger focus on risk ethics could contribute to the debate on nuclear energy for sustainability.

KW - energy production

KW - nuclear power

KW - risk ethics

KW - sustainable energy

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176363264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f63c8ab4-a788-3e5c-b965-6ec3c8122a56/

U2 - 10.14512/GAIA.32.3.4

DO - 10.14512/GAIA.32.3.4

M3 - Comments / Debate / Reports

AN - SCOPUS:85176363264

VL - 32

SP - 287

EP - 291

JO - GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society

JF - GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society

SN - 0940-5550

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Geldbesitz Jesu und der Jünger bei Markus und Matthäus
  2. Competitive Markets, Corporate Firms, and New Governance
  3. Social bees are fitter in more biodiverse environments
  4. Die kontroversen Theorien des Philosophen Peter Singer
  5. Chosen time headways by angry younger and older drivers
  6. Adapting videogame interfaces for the visually impaired
  7. Social Support in Online Peer Groups for Celiac Disease
  8. Funktionsverlagerung im Rahmen von e-Business-Aktivitäten
  9. Expatriate performance in terrorism-endangered countries
  10. Empowering Communities Through Citizen Entrepreneurship
  11. A mobile application for panic disorder and agoraphobia
  12. The Basic Values of Russian and European Schoolteachers
  13. Examens standardisés et représentations de l’examinateur
  14. Towards a socio-cognitive approach to knowledge transfer
  15. Gründung und Finanzierung freier Träger der Sozialarbeit
  16. Umweltbilanzierung von individuellem Mobilitätsverhalten
  17. Consumers' perceptions of biocidal products in households
  18. Perspektiven der Lernenden auf inklusiven NAWI-Unterricht
  19. Results from the U.S. Embassy School Election Project 2012
  20. Die Evaluierung des Bildungswesens in historischer Sicht
  21. The Affinity Between Free Trade Theory and Postmodernism
  22. Innovationen für einen nachhaltigen Umbau der Wirtschaft
  23. Why do students choose English as a medium of instruction?
  24. Wirtschaftlichkeit des Kanalpumpspeichers Elbe-Seitenkanal
  25. Why Fun Matters: In Search of Emergent Playful Experiences
  26. Learning from Safe-by-Design for Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design