Testing of a Multiple Criteria Assessment Tool for Healthcare Facilities Quality and Sustainability: The Case of German Hospitals

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Testing of a Multiple Criteria Assessment Tool for Healthcare Facilities Quality and Sustainability: The Case of German Hospitals. / Brambilla, Andrea; Apel, Jan Marvin; Schmidt-Ross, Inga et al.
In: Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 24, 16742, 14.12.2022.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Brambilla A, Apel JM, Schmidt-Ross I, Buffoli M, Capolongo S. Testing of a Multiple Criteria Assessment Tool for Healthcare Facilities Quality and Sustainability: The Case of German Hospitals. Sustainability. 2022 Dec 14;14(24):16742. doi: 10.3390/su142416742

Bibtex

@article{5711b5225ccf4fdd8525d5c6f2e770fe,
title = "Testing of a Multiple Criteria Assessment Tool for Healthcare Facilities Quality and Sustainability: The Case of German Hospitals",
abstract = "Background: Hospital facilities are an essential part of healthcare systems, making the assessment of their quality and sustainability pivotal. Most existing evaluation tools lack a holistic and validated approach, while predominantly excluding the built environment. The Italian hospital evaluation tool SustHealth v2 addresses the shortcoming of existing applications through its structured and more integrated approach; there is the need for further testing it. Methods: The study aims to test for the first time in an international case study the multicriteria assessment tool previously developed and validated. The tool assesses social, environmental, and organisational qualities in hospitals with an online survey containing 199 closed questions sent to German hospitals. A total of 14 full replies have been collected and the resulting data analysed through descriptive statistics and heat maps identifying patterns in ownership and size. Results: Within the sample, higher scores are reported in Social Quality, while lower in Environmental and Organisational Quality. Respondents performed well in the sustainability dimensions of health promotion, waste management, and patient safety. Improvements can be achieved in energy management, facility management, and technological innovation criteria. Private hospitals slightly outperform both public and non-profit clinics. The findings presented in this study suggest a non-linear relationship between sustainability and hospital size since the highest scores were obtained by either small or large facilities. Conclusion: The study highlighted strengths and limitation of SustHealth v2. Further testing and comparison are encouraged in different context.",
keywords = "environmental sustainability, evaluation tool, healthcare facilities, hospital, organisational sustainability, quality, social sustainability, sustainability, sustainability of healthcare facilities, Management studies",
author = "Andrea Brambilla and Apel, {Jan Marvin} and Inga Schmidt-Ross and Maddalena Buffoli and Stefano Capolongo",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 by the authors.",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
day = "14",
doi = "10.3390/su142416742",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "24",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing of a Multiple Criteria Assessment Tool for Healthcare Facilities Quality and Sustainability

T2 - The Case of German Hospitals

AU - Brambilla, Andrea

AU - Apel, Jan Marvin

AU - Schmidt-Ross, Inga

AU - Buffoli, Maddalena

AU - Capolongo, Stefano

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.

PY - 2022/12/14

Y1 - 2022/12/14

N2 - Background: Hospital facilities are an essential part of healthcare systems, making the assessment of their quality and sustainability pivotal. Most existing evaluation tools lack a holistic and validated approach, while predominantly excluding the built environment. The Italian hospital evaluation tool SustHealth v2 addresses the shortcoming of existing applications through its structured and more integrated approach; there is the need for further testing it. Methods: The study aims to test for the first time in an international case study the multicriteria assessment tool previously developed and validated. The tool assesses social, environmental, and organisational qualities in hospitals with an online survey containing 199 closed questions sent to German hospitals. A total of 14 full replies have been collected and the resulting data analysed through descriptive statistics and heat maps identifying patterns in ownership and size. Results: Within the sample, higher scores are reported in Social Quality, while lower in Environmental and Organisational Quality. Respondents performed well in the sustainability dimensions of health promotion, waste management, and patient safety. Improvements can be achieved in energy management, facility management, and technological innovation criteria. Private hospitals slightly outperform both public and non-profit clinics. The findings presented in this study suggest a non-linear relationship between sustainability and hospital size since the highest scores were obtained by either small or large facilities. Conclusion: The study highlighted strengths and limitation of SustHealth v2. Further testing and comparison are encouraged in different context.

AB - Background: Hospital facilities are an essential part of healthcare systems, making the assessment of their quality and sustainability pivotal. Most existing evaluation tools lack a holistic and validated approach, while predominantly excluding the built environment. The Italian hospital evaluation tool SustHealth v2 addresses the shortcoming of existing applications through its structured and more integrated approach; there is the need for further testing it. Methods: The study aims to test for the first time in an international case study the multicriteria assessment tool previously developed and validated. The tool assesses social, environmental, and organisational qualities in hospitals with an online survey containing 199 closed questions sent to German hospitals. A total of 14 full replies have been collected and the resulting data analysed through descriptive statistics and heat maps identifying patterns in ownership and size. Results: Within the sample, higher scores are reported in Social Quality, while lower in Environmental and Organisational Quality. Respondents performed well in the sustainability dimensions of health promotion, waste management, and patient safety. Improvements can be achieved in energy management, facility management, and technological innovation criteria. Private hospitals slightly outperform both public and non-profit clinics. The findings presented in this study suggest a non-linear relationship between sustainability and hospital size since the highest scores were obtained by either small or large facilities. Conclusion: The study highlighted strengths and limitation of SustHealth v2. Further testing and comparison are encouraged in different context.

KW - environmental sustainability

KW - evaluation tool

KW - healthcare facilities

KW - hospital

KW - organisational sustainability

KW - quality

KW - social sustainability

KW - sustainability

KW - sustainability of healthcare facilities

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144844626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su142416742

DO - 10.3390/su142416742

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85144844626

VL - 14

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 24

M1 - 16742

ER -

Documents

DOI