Task Choice Immunizes Against Incidental Affective Influences in Volition

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Task Choice Immunizes Against Incidental Affective Influences in Volition. / Gendolla, Guido H. E.; Bouzidi, Yann S.; Arvaniti, Sofia et al.

In: Motivation Science, Vol. 7, No. 3, 09.2021, p. 229-241.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Gendolla, GHE, Bouzidi, YS, Arvaniti, S, Gollwitzer, PM & Oettingen, G 2021, 'Task Choice Immunizes Against Incidental Affective Influences in Volition', Motivation Science, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000225

APA

Vancouver

Gendolla GHE, Bouzidi YS, Arvaniti S, Gollwitzer PM, Oettingen G. Task Choice Immunizes Against Incidental Affective Influences in Volition. Motivation Science. 2021 Sep;7(3):229-241. doi: 10.1037/mot0000225

Bibtex

@article{9f93893a1fc94be49f6b806f7e6cdbaf,
title = "Task Choice Immunizes Against Incidental Affective Influences in Volition",
abstract = "Two experiments tested whether engaging in actions by personal choice versus external task assignment moderates the effect of incidental affective stimulation on action control (volition). As choice of an action alternative has been found to lead to strong goal commitment, an implemental mindset, and determined task focus, we reasoned that it should shield action control from incidental affective influences. By contrast, external task assignment should lead to weaker action shielding and thus give way to incidental affective influences. Results followed our predictions. When participants were assigned the cognitive task, they persisted less (Study 1) and mobilized lower effort assessed as cardiac preejection period (Study 2) when they were exposed to happy music as compared with sad music. These music effects on volition did not appear among participants who could choose the task. Our results show that working on a task is shielded better from incidental affective influences when the task is chosen rather than assigned",
keywords = "action shielding, volition, affect, effort, persistence",
author = "Gendolla, {Guido H. E.} and Bouzidi, {Yann S.} and Sofia Arvaniti and Gollwitzer, {Peter M.} and Gabriele Oettingen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 American Psychological Association",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1037/mot0000225",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "229--241",
journal = "Motivation Science",
issn = "2333-8113",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Task Choice Immunizes Against Incidental Affective Influences in Volition

AU - Gendolla, Guido H. E.

AU - Bouzidi, Yann S.

AU - Arvaniti, Sofia

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter M.

AU - Oettingen, Gabriele

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 American Psychological Association

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - Two experiments tested whether engaging in actions by personal choice versus external task assignment moderates the effect of incidental affective stimulation on action control (volition). As choice of an action alternative has been found to lead to strong goal commitment, an implemental mindset, and determined task focus, we reasoned that it should shield action control from incidental affective influences. By contrast, external task assignment should lead to weaker action shielding and thus give way to incidental affective influences. Results followed our predictions. When participants were assigned the cognitive task, they persisted less (Study 1) and mobilized lower effort assessed as cardiac preejection period (Study 2) when they were exposed to happy music as compared with sad music. These music effects on volition did not appear among participants who could choose the task. Our results show that working on a task is shielded better from incidental affective influences when the task is chosen rather than assigned

AB - Two experiments tested whether engaging in actions by personal choice versus external task assignment moderates the effect of incidental affective stimulation on action control (volition). As choice of an action alternative has been found to lead to strong goal commitment, an implemental mindset, and determined task focus, we reasoned that it should shield action control from incidental affective influences. By contrast, external task assignment should lead to weaker action shielding and thus give way to incidental affective influences. Results followed our predictions. When participants were assigned the cognitive task, they persisted less (Study 1) and mobilized lower effort assessed as cardiac preejection period (Study 2) when they were exposed to happy music as compared with sad music. These music effects on volition did not appear among participants who could choose the task. Our results show that working on a task is shielded better from incidental affective influences when the task is chosen rather than assigned

KW - action shielding

KW - volition

KW - affect

KW - effort

KW - persistence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108356950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/mot0000225

DO - 10.1037/mot0000225

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 7

SP - 229

EP - 241

JO - Motivation Science

JF - Motivation Science

SN - 2333-8113

IS - 3

ER -

DOI