Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved. / Dengler, Jürgen; Löbel, Swantje; Dolnik, Christian.
In: Journal of Vegetation Science, Vol. 20, No. 4, 08.2009, p. 754-766.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dengler J, Löbel S, Dolnik C. Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2009 Aug;20(4):754-766. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01073.x

Bibtex

@article{1de743a38a914904b448eb8cede956d6,
title = "Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved",
abstract = "Question: While it is well known that species richness depends on plot size, it is not generally recognised that the same must be tme for constancy. Accordingly, many authors use varying plot sizes when classifying vegetation based on the comparison of constancies between groups of plots. We ask whether the constancy-area relationship follows a general mle, how strong the effect of plot sizes is on constancies, and if it is possible to correct constancies for area. Location: For empirical evaluation, we use data from plant communities in the Czech Republic, Sweden and Russia. Methods: To assess the potential influence of differences in plot size on constancies, we develop a mathematical model. Then, we use series of nested plot species richness data from a wide range of community types (herbaceous and forest) to determine the parameters of the derived function and to test how much the shape of the constancy-area relationship depends on taxa or vegetation types. Results: Generally, the constancy-area relationship can be described by C (A)= 1 - (1-C 0)(A/A0{\v )}d, with C being constancy, A area, C 0 known constancy on a specific area A0, and d a damping parameter accounting for spatial autocorrelation. As predicted by this function, constancies in plant communities always varied from values near 0% to near 100% if plot sizes were changed sufficiently. For the studied vegetation types, a two- to fourfold increase in plot size resulted in a change of conventional constancy classes, i.e. an increase of constancy by 20% or more. Conclusions: Vegetation classification, which largely relies on constancy values, irrespective of whether traditional or modem fidelity definitions are used, is strongly prone to distorting scale effects when relev{\'e}s of different plot sizes are combined in studies. The constancy-area functions presented allow an approximate transformation of constancies to other plot sizes but are flawed by idiosyncrasies in taxa and vegetation types. Thus, we conclude that the best solution for future surveys is to apply uniform plot sizes within a few a priori delimited formations and to determine diagnostic species only within these formations. Finally, we suggest that more detailed analyses of constancy-area relationships can contribute to a better understanding of species-area relationships because the latter are the summation of the first for all species.",
keywords = "Constancy-area relationship, Fidelity, Phytosociology, Presence degree, Scale dependence, Speciesarea relationship, Synoptic table, Syntaxonomy, Vegetation database, Biology",
author = "J{\"u}rgen Dengler and Swantje L{\"o}bel and Christian Dolnik",
year = "2009",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01073.x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "754--766",
journal = "Journal of Vegetation Science",
issn = "1100-9233",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved

AU - Dengler, Jürgen

AU - Löbel, Swantje

AU - Dolnik, Christian

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Question: While it is well known that species richness depends on plot size, it is not generally recognised that the same must be tme for constancy. Accordingly, many authors use varying plot sizes when classifying vegetation based on the comparison of constancies between groups of plots. We ask whether the constancy-area relationship follows a general mle, how strong the effect of plot sizes is on constancies, and if it is possible to correct constancies for area. Location: For empirical evaluation, we use data from plant communities in the Czech Republic, Sweden and Russia. Methods: To assess the potential influence of differences in plot size on constancies, we develop a mathematical model. Then, we use series of nested plot species richness data from a wide range of community types (herbaceous and forest) to determine the parameters of the derived function and to test how much the shape of the constancy-area relationship depends on taxa or vegetation types. Results: Generally, the constancy-area relationship can be described by C (A)= 1 - (1-C 0)(A/A0)̌d, with C being constancy, A area, C 0 known constancy on a specific area A0, and d a damping parameter accounting for spatial autocorrelation. As predicted by this function, constancies in plant communities always varied from values near 0% to near 100% if plot sizes were changed sufficiently. For the studied vegetation types, a two- to fourfold increase in plot size resulted in a change of conventional constancy classes, i.e. an increase of constancy by 20% or more. Conclusions: Vegetation classification, which largely relies on constancy values, irrespective of whether traditional or modem fidelity definitions are used, is strongly prone to distorting scale effects when relevés of different plot sizes are combined in studies. The constancy-area functions presented allow an approximate transformation of constancies to other plot sizes but are flawed by idiosyncrasies in taxa and vegetation types. Thus, we conclude that the best solution for future surveys is to apply uniform plot sizes within a few a priori delimited formations and to determine diagnostic species only within these formations. Finally, we suggest that more detailed analyses of constancy-area relationships can contribute to a better understanding of species-area relationships because the latter are the summation of the first for all species.

AB - Question: While it is well known that species richness depends on plot size, it is not generally recognised that the same must be tme for constancy. Accordingly, many authors use varying plot sizes when classifying vegetation based on the comparison of constancies between groups of plots. We ask whether the constancy-area relationship follows a general mle, how strong the effect of plot sizes is on constancies, and if it is possible to correct constancies for area. Location: For empirical evaluation, we use data from plant communities in the Czech Republic, Sweden and Russia. Methods: To assess the potential influence of differences in plot size on constancies, we develop a mathematical model. Then, we use series of nested plot species richness data from a wide range of community types (herbaceous and forest) to determine the parameters of the derived function and to test how much the shape of the constancy-area relationship depends on taxa or vegetation types. Results: Generally, the constancy-area relationship can be described by C (A)= 1 - (1-C 0)(A/A0)̌d, with C being constancy, A area, C 0 known constancy on a specific area A0, and d a damping parameter accounting for spatial autocorrelation. As predicted by this function, constancies in plant communities always varied from values near 0% to near 100% if plot sizes were changed sufficiently. For the studied vegetation types, a two- to fourfold increase in plot size resulted in a change of conventional constancy classes, i.e. an increase of constancy by 20% or more. Conclusions: Vegetation classification, which largely relies on constancy values, irrespective of whether traditional or modem fidelity definitions are used, is strongly prone to distorting scale effects when relevés of different plot sizes are combined in studies. The constancy-area functions presented allow an approximate transformation of constancies to other plot sizes but are flawed by idiosyncrasies in taxa and vegetation types. Thus, we conclude that the best solution for future surveys is to apply uniform plot sizes within a few a priori delimited formations and to determine diagnostic species only within these formations. Finally, we suggest that more detailed analyses of constancy-area relationships can contribute to a better understanding of species-area relationships because the latter are the summation of the first for all species.

KW - Constancy-area relationship

KW - Fidelity

KW - Phytosociology

KW - Presence degree

KW - Scale dependence

KW - Speciesarea relationship

KW - Synoptic table

KW - Syntaxonomy

KW - Vegetation database

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249133356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01073.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01073.x

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:70249133356

VL - 20

SP - 754

EP - 766

JO - Journal of Vegetation Science

JF - Journal of Vegetation Science

SN - 1100-9233

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Logistical Potentials of Load Balancing via the Build-up and Reduction of Stock
  2. Global fern and lycophyte richness explained: How regional and local factors shape plot richness
  3. Recent Advances in Intelligent Algorithms for Fault Detection and Diagnosis
  4. The role of spatial ability when fostering mental animation in multimedia learning
  5. Ecologies of Making
  6. Water quantity and quality dynamics of the THC - Tuyamuyun hydroengineering complex - and implications for reservoir operation
  7. Modeling High Aswan Dam Reservoir Morphology Using Remote Sensing to Reduce Evaporation
  8. Adaptive control of the nonlinear dynamic behavior of the cantilever-sample system of an atomic force microscope
  9. Saving (in) a common world
  10. 8th challenge on question answering over linked data (QALD-8)
  11. Detection of oscillations with application in the pantograph control
  12. Multi-Professional Support
  13. Use of design methods, team leaders' goal orientation, and team effectiveness: A follow-up study in software development projects
  14. Foreword to applied data science, demo, and nectar tracks
  15. Multiple
  16. Performance of methods to select landscape metrics for modelling species richness
  17. “Circuits of Commons”: Exploring the Connections Between Economic Lives and the Commons
  18. FaQuAD
  19. Recurring patterns and blueprints of industrial symbioses as structural units for an it tool
  20. Simon Denny
  21. Disentangling trade-offs and synergies around ecosystem services with the influence network framework
  22. New developments in extrusion of profiles with variable curvatures and cross-sections
  23. Development and application of a simplified sampling method for volatile polyfluorinated alkyl substances in indoor and environmental air
  24. Robust Decoupling Control of Contact Forces in Robotic Manipulation
  25. Pathways and mechanisms for catalyzing social impact through Orchestration: Insights from an open social innovation project
  26. Hands in Focus: Sign Language Recognition Via Top-Down Attention
  27. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relations in European forests depend on environmental context.
  28. Embracing scale-dependence to achieve a deeper understanding of biodiversity and its change across communities
  29. Combination of a reduced order state observer and an Extended Kalman Filter for Peltier cells