Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved. / Dengler, Jürgen; Löbel, Swantje; Dolnik, Christian.
In: Journal of Vegetation Science, Vol. 20, No. 4, 08.2009, p. 754-766.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dengler J, Löbel S, Dolnik C. Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2009 Aug;20(4):754-766. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01073.x

Bibtex

@article{1de743a38a914904b448eb8cede956d6,
title = "Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved",
abstract = "Question: While it is well known that species richness depends on plot size, it is not generally recognised that the same must be tme for constancy. Accordingly, many authors use varying plot sizes when classifying vegetation based on the comparison of constancies between groups of plots. We ask whether the constancy-area relationship follows a general mle, how strong the effect of plot sizes is on constancies, and if it is possible to correct constancies for area. Location: For empirical evaluation, we use data from plant communities in the Czech Republic, Sweden and Russia. Methods: To assess the potential influence of differences in plot size on constancies, we develop a mathematical model. Then, we use series of nested plot species richness data from a wide range of community types (herbaceous and forest) to determine the parameters of the derived function and to test how much the shape of the constancy-area relationship depends on taxa or vegetation types. Results: Generally, the constancy-area relationship can be described by C (A)= 1 - (1-C 0)(A/A0{\v )}d, with C being constancy, A area, C 0 known constancy on a specific area A0, and d a damping parameter accounting for spatial autocorrelation. As predicted by this function, constancies in plant communities always varied from values near 0% to near 100% if plot sizes were changed sufficiently. For the studied vegetation types, a two- to fourfold increase in plot size resulted in a change of conventional constancy classes, i.e. an increase of constancy by 20% or more. Conclusions: Vegetation classification, which largely relies on constancy values, irrespective of whether traditional or modem fidelity definitions are used, is strongly prone to distorting scale effects when relev{\'e}s of different plot sizes are combined in studies. The constancy-area functions presented allow an approximate transformation of constancies to other plot sizes but are flawed by idiosyncrasies in taxa and vegetation types. Thus, we conclude that the best solution for future surveys is to apply uniform plot sizes within a few a priori delimited formations and to determine diagnostic species only within these formations. Finally, we suggest that more detailed analyses of constancy-area relationships can contribute to a better understanding of species-area relationships because the latter are the summation of the first for all species.",
keywords = "Constancy-area relationship, Fidelity, Phytosociology, Presence degree, Scale dependence, Speciesarea relationship, Synoptic table, Syntaxonomy, Vegetation database, Biology",
author = "J{\"u}rgen Dengler and Swantje L{\"o}bel and Christian Dolnik",
year = "2009",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01073.x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "754--766",
journal = "Journal of Vegetation Science",
issn = "1100-9233",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Species constancy depends on plot size - A problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved

AU - Dengler, Jürgen

AU - Löbel, Swantje

AU - Dolnik, Christian

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Question: While it is well known that species richness depends on plot size, it is not generally recognised that the same must be tme for constancy. Accordingly, many authors use varying plot sizes when classifying vegetation based on the comparison of constancies between groups of plots. We ask whether the constancy-area relationship follows a general mle, how strong the effect of plot sizes is on constancies, and if it is possible to correct constancies for area. Location: For empirical evaluation, we use data from plant communities in the Czech Republic, Sweden and Russia. Methods: To assess the potential influence of differences in plot size on constancies, we develop a mathematical model. Then, we use series of nested plot species richness data from a wide range of community types (herbaceous and forest) to determine the parameters of the derived function and to test how much the shape of the constancy-area relationship depends on taxa or vegetation types. Results: Generally, the constancy-area relationship can be described by C (A)= 1 - (1-C 0)(A/A0)̌d, with C being constancy, A area, C 0 known constancy on a specific area A0, and d a damping parameter accounting for spatial autocorrelation. As predicted by this function, constancies in plant communities always varied from values near 0% to near 100% if plot sizes were changed sufficiently. For the studied vegetation types, a two- to fourfold increase in plot size resulted in a change of conventional constancy classes, i.e. an increase of constancy by 20% or more. Conclusions: Vegetation classification, which largely relies on constancy values, irrespective of whether traditional or modem fidelity definitions are used, is strongly prone to distorting scale effects when relevés of different plot sizes are combined in studies. The constancy-area functions presented allow an approximate transformation of constancies to other plot sizes but are flawed by idiosyncrasies in taxa and vegetation types. Thus, we conclude that the best solution for future surveys is to apply uniform plot sizes within a few a priori delimited formations and to determine diagnostic species only within these formations. Finally, we suggest that more detailed analyses of constancy-area relationships can contribute to a better understanding of species-area relationships because the latter are the summation of the first for all species.

AB - Question: While it is well known that species richness depends on plot size, it is not generally recognised that the same must be tme for constancy. Accordingly, many authors use varying plot sizes when classifying vegetation based on the comparison of constancies between groups of plots. We ask whether the constancy-area relationship follows a general mle, how strong the effect of plot sizes is on constancies, and if it is possible to correct constancies for area. Location: For empirical evaluation, we use data from plant communities in the Czech Republic, Sweden and Russia. Methods: To assess the potential influence of differences in plot size on constancies, we develop a mathematical model. Then, we use series of nested plot species richness data from a wide range of community types (herbaceous and forest) to determine the parameters of the derived function and to test how much the shape of the constancy-area relationship depends on taxa or vegetation types. Results: Generally, the constancy-area relationship can be described by C (A)= 1 - (1-C 0)(A/A0)̌d, with C being constancy, A area, C 0 known constancy on a specific area A0, and d a damping parameter accounting for spatial autocorrelation. As predicted by this function, constancies in plant communities always varied from values near 0% to near 100% if plot sizes were changed sufficiently. For the studied vegetation types, a two- to fourfold increase in plot size resulted in a change of conventional constancy classes, i.e. an increase of constancy by 20% or more. Conclusions: Vegetation classification, which largely relies on constancy values, irrespective of whether traditional or modem fidelity definitions are used, is strongly prone to distorting scale effects when relevés of different plot sizes are combined in studies. The constancy-area functions presented allow an approximate transformation of constancies to other plot sizes but are flawed by idiosyncrasies in taxa and vegetation types. Thus, we conclude that the best solution for future surveys is to apply uniform plot sizes within a few a priori delimited formations and to determine diagnostic species only within these formations. Finally, we suggest that more detailed analyses of constancy-area relationships can contribute to a better understanding of species-area relationships because the latter are the summation of the first for all species.

KW - Constancy-area relationship

KW - Fidelity

KW - Phytosociology

KW - Presence degree

KW - Scale dependence

KW - Speciesarea relationship

KW - Synoptic table

KW - Syntaxonomy

KW - Vegetation database

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249133356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01073.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01073.x

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:70249133356

VL - 20

SP - 754

EP - 766

JO - Journal of Vegetation Science

JF - Journal of Vegetation Science

SN - 1100-9233

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. NNARX networks on didactic level system identification
  2. Archives
  3. Working memory capacity and narrative task performance
  4. Continued logarithm representation of real numbers
  5. Interplays between relational and instrumental values
  6. Performance Saga: Interview 06
  7. Multiple
  8. Passive Rotation Compensation in Parallel Kinematics Using Quaternions
  9. Study of non-linear systems
  10. An Experimental Approach to the Optimization of Customer Information at the Point of Sale
  11. Development and validation of chemometrics-assisted spectrophotometry and liquid chromatography methods for the simultaneous determination of the active ingredients in two multicomponent mixtures containing chlorpheniramine maleate and phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride.
  12. The implications of knowledge hiding at work for recovery after work: A diary study
  13. Assessing empirical research on value-based management
  14. Disentangling trade-offs and synergies around ecosystem services with the influence network framework
  15. Acquisitional pragmatics
  16. Embracing scale-dependence to achieve a deeper understanding of biodiversity and its change across communities
  17. Exports and productivity: A survey of the evidence from firm-level data
  18. Leaf trait variation within individuals mediates the relationship between tree species richness and productivity
  19. Current overview of research on priority effects and its relevance to restoration
  20. Decentralized control of assembly processes driven by Gentelligent® Parts
  21. Using latent class analysis to produce a typology of environmental concern in the UK
  22. Conception of an indirectly controlled servo valve for IC engine valve position control
  23. Independence without control
  24. Introduction
  25. Smart cities, smart borders. Sensing networks and security in the urban space
  26. Number theoretical peculiarities in the dimension theory of dynamical systems
  27. Importance of timing
  28. Uncertainty, Pluralism, and the Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm
  29. Mapping of Innovation Relations
  30. Diversity and specialization of host parasitoid interactions in an urban rural interface
  31. Initial evidence for a systematic link between core values and emotional experiences in environmental situations
  32. EEG frequency tagging evidence of intact social interaction recognition in adults with autism
  33. Differences in the earnings distribution of self- and dependent employed German men
  34. Quo Vadis, Umweltinformatik? 6. Workshop
  35. Ecologies of things and texts
  36. Democratization as Human Empowerment
  37. From Feedback to Formative Guidance
  38. Leverage points and levers of inclusive conservation in protected areas
  39. Governance statt Management oder: Management der Governance
  40. A highly endangered species on the edge