Sowing density: A neglected factor fundamentally affecting root distribution and biomass allocation of field grown spring barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Sowing density: A neglected factor fundamentally affecting root distribution and biomass allocation of field grown spring barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.). / Hecht, Vera L.; Nagel, Kerstin A.; Rascher, Uwe et al.
In: Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 7, 00944, 28.06.2016.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b1c7cf711e1d4ba1951f003e6770dd85,
title = "Sowing density: A neglected factor fundamentally affecting root distribution and biomass allocation of field grown spring barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)",
abstract = "Studies on the function of root traits and the genetic variation in these traits are often conducted under controlled conditions using individual potted plants. Little is known about root growth under field conditions and how root traits are affected by agronomic practices in particular sowing density. We hypothesized that with increasing sowing density, root length density (root length per soil volume, cm cm-3) increases in the topsoil as well as specific root length (root length per root dry weight, cm g-1) due to greater investment in fine roots. Therefore, we studied two spring barley cultivars at ten different sowing densities (24–340 seeds m-2) in 2 consecutive years in a clay loam field in Germany and established sowing density dose-response curves for several root and shoot traits. We took soil cores for measuring roots up to a depth of 60 cm in and between plant rows (inter-row distance 21 cm). Root length density increased with increasing sowing density and was greatest in the plant row in the topsoil (0–10 cm). Greater sowing density increased specific root length partly through greater production of fine roots in the topsoil. Rooting depth (D50) of the major root axes (root diameter class 0.4–1.0 mm) was not affected. Root mass fraction decreased, while stem mass fraction increased with sowing density and over time. Leaf mass fraction was constant over sowing density but greater leaf area was realized through increased specific leaf area. Considering fertilization, we assume that light competition caused plants to grow more shoot mass at the cost of investment into roots, which is partly compensated by increased specific root length and shallow rooting. Increased biomass per area with greater densities suggest that density increases the efficiency of the cropping system, however, declines in harvest index at densities over 230 plants m-2 suggest that this efficiency did not translate into greater yield. We conclude that plant density is a modifier of root architecture and that root traits and their utility in breeding for greater productivity have to be understood in the context of high sowing densities.",
keywords = "Biomass allocation, Field, Root architecture, Root length density, Root morphology, Ecosystems Research, Biology, Sustainability Science",
author = "Hecht, {Vera L.} and Nagel, {Kerstin A.} and Uwe Rascher and Postma, {Johannes A.} and Temperton, {Victoria Martine}",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
day = "28",
doi = "10.3389/fpls.2016.00944",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Frontiers in Plant Science",
issn = "1664-462X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media SA",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sowing density

T2 - A neglected factor fundamentally affecting root distribution and biomass allocation of field grown spring barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)

AU - Hecht, Vera L.

AU - Nagel, Kerstin A.

AU - Rascher, Uwe

AU - Postma, Johannes A.

AU - Temperton, Victoria Martine

PY - 2016/6/28

Y1 - 2016/6/28

N2 - Studies on the function of root traits and the genetic variation in these traits are often conducted under controlled conditions using individual potted plants. Little is known about root growth under field conditions and how root traits are affected by agronomic practices in particular sowing density. We hypothesized that with increasing sowing density, root length density (root length per soil volume, cm cm-3) increases in the topsoil as well as specific root length (root length per root dry weight, cm g-1) due to greater investment in fine roots. Therefore, we studied two spring barley cultivars at ten different sowing densities (24–340 seeds m-2) in 2 consecutive years in a clay loam field in Germany and established sowing density dose-response curves for several root and shoot traits. We took soil cores for measuring roots up to a depth of 60 cm in and between plant rows (inter-row distance 21 cm). Root length density increased with increasing sowing density and was greatest in the plant row in the topsoil (0–10 cm). Greater sowing density increased specific root length partly through greater production of fine roots in the topsoil. Rooting depth (D50) of the major root axes (root diameter class 0.4–1.0 mm) was not affected. Root mass fraction decreased, while stem mass fraction increased with sowing density and over time. Leaf mass fraction was constant over sowing density but greater leaf area was realized through increased specific leaf area. Considering fertilization, we assume that light competition caused plants to grow more shoot mass at the cost of investment into roots, which is partly compensated by increased specific root length and shallow rooting. Increased biomass per area with greater densities suggest that density increases the efficiency of the cropping system, however, declines in harvest index at densities over 230 plants m-2 suggest that this efficiency did not translate into greater yield. We conclude that plant density is a modifier of root architecture and that root traits and their utility in breeding for greater productivity have to be understood in the context of high sowing densities.

AB - Studies on the function of root traits and the genetic variation in these traits are often conducted under controlled conditions using individual potted plants. Little is known about root growth under field conditions and how root traits are affected by agronomic practices in particular sowing density. We hypothesized that with increasing sowing density, root length density (root length per soil volume, cm cm-3) increases in the topsoil as well as specific root length (root length per root dry weight, cm g-1) due to greater investment in fine roots. Therefore, we studied two spring barley cultivars at ten different sowing densities (24–340 seeds m-2) in 2 consecutive years in a clay loam field in Germany and established sowing density dose-response curves for several root and shoot traits. We took soil cores for measuring roots up to a depth of 60 cm in and between plant rows (inter-row distance 21 cm). Root length density increased with increasing sowing density and was greatest in the plant row in the topsoil (0–10 cm). Greater sowing density increased specific root length partly through greater production of fine roots in the topsoil. Rooting depth (D50) of the major root axes (root diameter class 0.4–1.0 mm) was not affected. Root mass fraction decreased, while stem mass fraction increased with sowing density and over time. Leaf mass fraction was constant over sowing density but greater leaf area was realized through increased specific leaf area. Considering fertilization, we assume that light competition caused plants to grow more shoot mass at the cost of investment into roots, which is partly compensated by increased specific root length and shallow rooting. Increased biomass per area with greater densities suggest that density increases the efficiency of the cropping system, however, declines in harvest index at densities over 230 plants m-2 suggest that this efficiency did not translate into greater yield. We conclude that plant density is a modifier of root architecture and that root traits and their utility in breeding for greater productivity have to be understood in the context of high sowing densities.

KW - Biomass allocation

KW - Field

KW - Root architecture

KW - Root length density

KW - Root morphology

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Biology

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976487317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpls.2016.00944

DO - 10.3389/fpls.2016.00944

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 27446171

AN - SCOPUS:84976487317

VL - 7

JO - Frontiers in Plant Science

JF - Frontiers in Plant Science

SN - 1664-462X

M1 - 00944

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Kerstin Nolte

Publications

  1. Materialitäten der Kindheit
  2. Beschreibungsmethodik für AAL-Integrationsprofile
  3. Implementation intentions and the willful pursuit of prosocial goals in negotiations
  4. The complementarity of single-species and ecosystem-oriented research in conservation research
  5. Working time dimensions and well-being
  6. Evidence-Based Entrepreneurship
  7. Schelling's Naturalism
  8. Panel Cointegration Testing in the Presence of a Time Trend
  9. The recent double paradigm shift in restoration ecology
  10. Tier
  11. A holistic approach to expatriate management
  12. Ästhetische Bildung der Differenz
  13. Context, contexts and appropriateness
  14. The structure of contributing factors of human error in safety-critical industries
  15. ... address unknown?
  16. SOFTWARE - SOUND-Spiele.
  17. Unobtrusive Detection of Respiratory Rate through UWB-Sensing for Applications of Ambient Assisted Living
  18. Harmful interference and human rights
  19. Pelvis and hips
  20. Sowing density
  21. Associations between the financial and industry expertise of audit committee members and Key Audit Matters within related audit reports
  22. The Settlement of EEZ Fisheries Access Disputes under UNCLOS
  23. Single, Double and Quadruple Maximum Power Point Trackers for a Stand-Alone Photovoltaic System
  24. Tourists’ Weather Perceptions and Weather Related Behavior
  25. The parrot knew everything
  26. Expatriate Management
  27. Adaptation and validation of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument for Portuguese university students
  28. Hacking Crowdfunding
  29. One voice, one message, but conflicting goals
  30. European welfare states constructing “Unaccompanied Minors”
  31. Sensor Measures of Affective Leaning
  32. Meta-custom and the court
  33. You Can't Always Get What You Want
  34. Reframing the Food–Biodiversity Challenge
  35. Reprint of
  36. Fly
  37. Applying the ecosystem services framework to pasture-based livestock farming systems in Europe
  38. Strategic networking for sustainability
  39. Frustrated and helpless - sources and consequences of students’ negative deactivating emotions in university mathematics
  40. Digital skills in healthcare