Social Contexts in Team Formation: Why Do Independent Start-Ups and University Spin-Offs Form Teams Differently?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Social Contexts in Team Formation: Why Do Independent Start-Ups and University Spin-Offs Form Teams Differently? / Scheidgen, Katharina.
In: Historical Social Research, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2019, p. 42-74.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9ced161d80d64c73b252054ad77f92ea,
title = "Social Contexts in Team Formation:: Why Do Independent Start-Ups and University Spin-Offs Form Teams Differently?",
abstract = "Although the entrepreneurial team has gained increasing attention as a unit of analysis, we still do not understand much about how these teams form. Previous research has focused either on existing social relationships and their role in the search for potential team members or on criteria for selecting team members. Consequently, we do not yet understand the interplay of search and selection. Another long-neglected aspect that is being increasingly recognized in entrepreneurship research is that the entrepreneurial process is influenced by its social context beyond existing social relationships. This social context is another important factor that has to be considered to properly understand team formation. To analyze how specific characteristics of one particularly relevant social context – namely, the entrepreneurial field – impact the search for and selection of team members, I conducted a qualitative, multiple-case study that compares innovative new ventures in Berlin. The study shows that different types of ventures in different phases exhibit different team formation patterns based on their different and changing social contexts. From these patterns, I have derived different team-formation mechanisms and propositions about the conditions under which they apply.",
keywords = "Entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial teams, team formation, qualitative research, social context",
author = "Katharina Scheidgen",
note = "Special Issue: Entrepreneurial Groups and Entrepreneurial Families ",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.12759/hsr.44.2019.4.42-74",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "42--74",
journal = "Historical Social Research",
issn = "0172-6404",
publisher = "GESIS – Leibniz-Institut f{\"u}r Sozialwissenschaften",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Contexts in Team Formation:

T2 - Why Do Independent Start-Ups and University Spin-Offs Form Teams Differently?

AU - Scheidgen, Katharina

N1 - Special Issue: Entrepreneurial Groups and Entrepreneurial Families

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Although the entrepreneurial team has gained increasing attention as a unit of analysis, we still do not understand much about how these teams form. Previous research has focused either on existing social relationships and their role in the search for potential team members or on criteria for selecting team members. Consequently, we do not yet understand the interplay of search and selection. Another long-neglected aspect that is being increasingly recognized in entrepreneurship research is that the entrepreneurial process is influenced by its social context beyond existing social relationships. This social context is another important factor that has to be considered to properly understand team formation. To analyze how specific characteristics of one particularly relevant social context – namely, the entrepreneurial field – impact the search for and selection of team members, I conducted a qualitative, multiple-case study that compares innovative new ventures in Berlin. The study shows that different types of ventures in different phases exhibit different team formation patterns based on their different and changing social contexts. From these patterns, I have derived different team-formation mechanisms and propositions about the conditions under which they apply.

AB - Although the entrepreneurial team has gained increasing attention as a unit of analysis, we still do not understand much about how these teams form. Previous research has focused either on existing social relationships and their role in the search for potential team members or on criteria for selecting team members. Consequently, we do not yet understand the interplay of search and selection. Another long-neglected aspect that is being increasingly recognized in entrepreneurship research is that the entrepreneurial process is influenced by its social context beyond existing social relationships. This social context is another important factor that has to be considered to properly understand team formation. To analyze how specific characteristics of one particularly relevant social context – namely, the entrepreneurial field – impact the search for and selection of team members, I conducted a qualitative, multiple-case study that compares innovative new ventures in Berlin. The study shows that different types of ventures in different phases exhibit different team formation patterns based on their different and changing social contexts. From these patterns, I have derived different team-formation mechanisms and propositions about the conditions under which they apply.

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - entrepreneurial teams

KW - team formation

KW - qualitative research

KW - social context

U2 - 10.12759/hsr.44.2019.4.42-74

DO - 10.12759/hsr.44.2019.4.42-74

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 44

SP - 42

EP - 74

JO - Historical Social Research

JF - Historical Social Research

SN - 0172-6404

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Bilder – Bücher
  2. Lekcja 23-24
  3. Freiheit der Kunst durch freie Werke?
  4. Rise and Shine
  5. Vorabentscheidungsverfahren, schriftliches Verfahren
  6. The granular nature of the great export collapse in German manufacturing industries, 2008/2009
  7. § 16
  8. Collective Litigation in German Civil Procedure
  9. Bildkompetenz
  10. Der Strommarkt in Europa zwischen Liberalisierung und Klimaschutz
  11. Demokratiekompetenz als berufliche Handlungskompetenz
  12. Powder Metallurgically Manufactured Metal Matrix Composites
  13. Landwirtschaft:
  14. Sustainable Finance
  15. The Psychological Actions and Entrepreneurial Success
  16. Written Reasoning in Primary School
  17. In 10 Schritten mit Kindern zum Stab(hoch)springen
  18. Raus aus der Opferrolle!
  19. § 46 Windenergie an Land bis 2018
  20. Der Netzausbau gelingt nur mit mehr Wettbewerb und stärkerer Regulierung
  21. Kreativität im Englischunterricht
  22. [Review] Tracy McDonald e Daniel Vandersommers (a cura di), Zoo Studies. A New Humanities, Montreal, McGill¿Queen¿s University Press, 2019, 345 pp.
  23. RITUAL WITHOUT COMMITMENT - THE 3RD DIRECT EUROPEAN-PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS
  24. Treffen der Generationen
  25. Inquiry-based learning and secondary chemistry education – a contradiction?
  26. The tiger beetles (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) of the southern Levant and adjacent territories
  27. Schulleitung in Deutschland
  28. Wege der Anti-Dialektik
  29. Higher Productivity in Importing German Manufacturing Firms
  30. Ungewolltes Lernen als Risiko im Hause des Lernens
  31. Water, Rivers and Wetlands
  32. Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation
  33. Überlegungen zur analytischen Fallbeschreibung in der Sozialarbeit