1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. Science Communication as a Collective In...
  6. Output formats
  7. //

Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation

Research output: Journal contributions › Comments / Debate / Reports › Research

Standard

Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor : A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation. / Holford, Dawn; Fasce, Angelo ; Wulf, Marlene et al.

In: Science Communication, Vol. 45, No. 4, 08.2023, p. 539-554.

Research output: Journal contributions › Comments / Debate / Reports › Research

Harvard

Holford, D, Fasce, A, Wulf, M, Kause, A, Tapper, K, Demko, M, Lewandowski, S, Hahn, U, Abels, CM, Ahmed, A-R, Sameer, A, Boender, ST, Bruns, H, Fischer, H, Gilde, C, Hanel, PHP, Herzog, SM, Lehmann, S, Nurse, MS, Orr, C, Pescetelli, N, Petrescu, M, Sa, S, Schmid, P, Sirota, M & Wulf, M 2023, 'Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation', Science Communication, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231162634

APA

Holford, D., Fasce, A., Wulf, M., Kause, A., Tapper, K., Demko, M., Lewandowski, S., Hahn, U., Abels, C. M., Ahmed, A-R., Sameer, A., Boender, S. T., Bruns, H., Fischer, H., Gilde, C., Hanel, P. H. P., Herzog, S. M., Lehmann, S., Nurse, M. S., ... Wulf, M. (2023). Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation. Science Communication, 45(4), 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231162634

Vancouver

Holford D, Fasce A, Wulf M, Kause A, Tapper K, Demko M et al. Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation. Science Communication. 2023 Aug;45(4):539-554. Epub 2023 Apr 4. doi: 10.1177/10755470231162634

Bibtex

@article{8d8809df76a24aac951e36b7b4f1bd2a,
title = "Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation",
abstract = "Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence—a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be informed by (a) a wider base of aggregated knowledge, (b) contributions from a diverse scientific community, (c) participatory input from stakeholders, and (d) better responsiveness to ongoing changes in the state of knowledge.",
keywords = "collective intelligence, epistemic diversity, knowledge aggregation, knowledge updating, participatory input, science communication, Psychology",
author = "Dawn Holford and Angelo Fasce and Marlene Wulf and Astrid Kause and Katy Tapper and Miso Demko and Stefan Lewandowski and Ulrike Hahn and Abels, {Christoph M.} and Al-Rawi Ahmed and Alladin Sameer and Boender, {Sonja T.} and Hendrik Bruns and Helen Fischer and Christian Gilde and Hanel, {Paul H.P.} and Herzog, {Stefan M.} and Sune Lehmann and Nurse, {Matthew S.} and Caroline Orr and Niccol{\`o} Pescetelli and Maria Petrescu and Sunita Sa and Philipp Schmid and Miroslav Sirota and Marlene Wulf",
note = "The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Holford, Fasce, Lewandowsky and Schmid were supported by the European Commission Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 Grant 964728 (JITSUVAX). Lewandowksy and Abels were supported by the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant 101020961 PRODEMINFO). Lewandowsky was supported by the Humboldt Foundation through a research award. Hahn was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), UKRI. Herzog was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Grant 458366841 (POLTOOLS). Lehmann was supported by the Villum Foundation (34288). Nurse was supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship. Sirota was supported by the European Commission Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 Grant 101016967 (YUFERING). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023.",
year = "2023",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1177/10755470231162634",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "539--554",
journal = "Science Communication",
issn = "1075-5470",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor

T2 - A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation

AU - Holford, Dawn

AU - Fasce, Angelo

AU - Wulf, Marlene

AU - Kause, Astrid

AU - Tapper, Katy

AU - Demko, Miso

AU - Lewandowski, Stefan

AU - Hahn, Ulrike

AU - Abels, Christoph M.

AU - Ahmed, Al-Rawi

AU - Sameer, Alladin

AU - Boender, Sonja T.

AU - Bruns, Hendrik

AU - Fischer, Helen

AU - Gilde, Christian

AU - Hanel, Paul H.P.

AU - Herzog, Stefan M.

AU - Lehmann, Sune

AU - Nurse, Matthew S.

AU - Orr, Caroline

AU - Pescetelli, Niccolò

AU - Petrescu, Maria

AU - Sa, Sunita

AU - Schmid, Philipp

AU - Sirota, Miroslav

AU - Wulf, Marlene

N1 - The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Holford, Fasce, Lewandowsky and Schmid were supported by the European Commission Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 Grant 964728 (JITSUVAX). Lewandowksy and Abels were supported by the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant 101020961 PRODEMINFO). Lewandowsky was supported by the Humboldt Foundation through a research award. Hahn was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), UKRI. Herzog was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Grant 458366841 (POLTOOLS). Lehmann was supported by the Villum Foundation (34288). Nurse was supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship. Sirota was supported by the European Commission Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 Grant 101016967 (YUFERING). Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023.

PY - 2023/8

Y1 - 2023/8

N2 - Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence—a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be informed by (a) a wider base of aggregated knowledge, (b) contributions from a diverse scientific community, (c) participatory input from stakeholders, and (d) better responsiveness to ongoing changes in the state of knowledge.

AB - Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence—a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be informed by (a) a wider base of aggregated knowledge, (b) contributions from a diverse scientific community, (c) participatory input from stakeholders, and (d) better responsiveness to ongoing changes in the state of knowledge.

KW - collective intelligence

KW - epistemic diversity

KW - knowledge aggregation

KW - knowledge updating

KW - participatory input

KW - science communication

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152895225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/33c3a388-fa2f-3d89-ae38-1a0b11ce07f9/

U2 - 10.1177/10755470231162634

DO - 10.1177/10755470231162634

M3 - Comments / Debate / Reports

C2 - 37994373

VL - 45

SP - 539

EP - 554

JO - Science Communication

JF - Science Communication

SN - 1075-5470

IS - 4

ER -

Other publications by the same author(s)

Confidence levels and likelihood terms in IPCC reports: a survey of experts from different scientific disciplines

Kause, A., Bruine de Bruin, W., Persson, J., Thorén, H., Olsson, L., Wallin, A., Dessai, S. & Vareman, N., 01.07.2022, In: Climatic Change. 173, 1-2, 18 p., 2.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Communicating Uncertainties About the Effects of Medical Interventions Using Different Display Formats

McDowell, M. & Kause, A., 01.12.2021, In: Risk Analysis. 41, 12, p. 2220-2239 20 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Communications about uncertainty in scientific climate-related findings: a qualitative systematic review

Kause, A., Bruine de Bruin, W., Domingos, S., Mittal, N., Lowe, J. & Fung, F., 01.05.2021, In: Environmental Research Letters. 16, 5, 20 p., 053005.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Engaging citizens in sustainability research: comparing survey recruitment and responses between Facebook, Twitter and qualtrics

Bridge, G., Armstrong, B., Reynolds, C., Wang, C., Schmidt, X., Kause, A., Ffoulkes, C., Krawczyk, C., Miller, G., Serjeant, S. & Oakden, L., 30.09.2021, In: British Food Journal. 123, 9, p. 3116-3132 17 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

How Does Citizen Science Compare to Online Survey Panels? A Comparison of Food Knowledge and Perceptions Between the Zooniverse, Prolific and Qualtrics UK Panels

Armstrong, B., Reynolds, C., Bridge, G., Oakden, L., Wang, C., Panzone, L., Schmidt Rivera, X., Kause, A., Ffoulkes, C., Krawczyk, C., Miller, G. & Serjeant, S., 27.01.2021, In: Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 4, 11 p., 575021.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

DOI