Risk and Security: Diagnosis of the present in context of (post-)modern insecurities

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Risk and Security: Diagnosis of the present in context of (post-)modern insecurities. / Kaufmann, Stefan; Wichum, Ricky.
In: Historical Social Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2016, p. 48-69.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ce7ebd68627247d3b8679dac92ed4513,
title = "Risk and Security: Diagnosis of the present in context of (post-)modern insecurities",
abstract = "This essay claims that the upsurge of security nowadays is not caused by specific events such as 9/11, Fukushima, or similar catastrophes. Our assumption is, in contrast, that it is the constitution of functionally differentiated societies itself which allows the security and risk discourse to be applied to all types of issues and phenomena, even though security and risk have only went viral as universal societal problems in the late 20th century. We will flesh out this approach using three bodies of work essential to the German debate. With regard to social policy, Franz-Xaver Kaufmann argues that the viral nature of the security issue arises from the fact that the security concept in modern society is split into system security and self-confidence. Niklas Luhmann's concept of risk - stemming from systems theory - shows that the prominence of the topic is the result of the intrinsically modern compulsion of having to forejudge an uncertain future. In contrast, Ulrich Beck's work on (global) risk societies is centred on the catastrophic potential inherent in (post -)modern risks as a cause for the rise of security debates. The sociological analysis employed here not only explains the rise of risk and security topics; it also provides society with a characterization of itself, which in turn can re-affect society and ultimately motivate a different historiographical self-description.",
keywords = "Digital media, Security, risk, knowledge, sociological theory, governance through security",
author = "Stefan Kaufmann and Ricky Wichum",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.12759/hsr.41.2016.1.48-69",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "48--69",
journal = "Historical Social Research",
issn = "0172-6404",
publisher = "Zentrum fur Historische Sozialforschung e.V",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk and Security

T2 - Diagnosis of the present in context of (post-)modern insecurities

AU - Kaufmann, Stefan

AU - Wichum, Ricky

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This essay claims that the upsurge of security nowadays is not caused by specific events such as 9/11, Fukushima, or similar catastrophes. Our assumption is, in contrast, that it is the constitution of functionally differentiated societies itself which allows the security and risk discourse to be applied to all types of issues and phenomena, even though security and risk have only went viral as universal societal problems in the late 20th century. We will flesh out this approach using three bodies of work essential to the German debate. With regard to social policy, Franz-Xaver Kaufmann argues that the viral nature of the security issue arises from the fact that the security concept in modern society is split into system security and self-confidence. Niklas Luhmann's concept of risk - stemming from systems theory - shows that the prominence of the topic is the result of the intrinsically modern compulsion of having to forejudge an uncertain future. In contrast, Ulrich Beck's work on (global) risk societies is centred on the catastrophic potential inherent in (post -)modern risks as a cause for the rise of security debates. The sociological analysis employed here not only explains the rise of risk and security topics; it also provides society with a characterization of itself, which in turn can re-affect society and ultimately motivate a different historiographical self-description.

AB - This essay claims that the upsurge of security nowadays is not caused by specific events such as 9/11, Fukushima, or similar catastrophes. Our assumption is, in contrast, that it is the constitution of functionally differentiated societies itself which allows the security and risk discourse to be applied to all types of issues and phenomena, even though security and risk have only went viral as universal societal problems in the late 20th century. We will flesh out this approach using three bodies of work essential to the German debate. With regard to social policy, Franz-Xaver Kaufmann argues that the viral nature of the security issue arises from the fact that the security concept in modern society is split into system security and self-confidence. Niklas Luhmann's concept of risk - stemming from systems theory - shows that the prominence of the topic is the result of the intrinsically modern compulsion of having to forejudge an uncertain future. In contrast, Ulrich Beck's work on (global) risk societies is centred on the catastrophic potential inherent in (post -)modern risks as a cause for the rise of security debates. The sociological analysis employed here not only explains the rise of risk and security topics; it also provides society with a characterization of itself, which in turn can re-affect society and ultimately motivate a different historiographical self-description.

KW - Digital media

KW - Security

KW - risk

KW - knowledge

KW - sociological theory

KW - governance through security

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979835567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.12759/hsr.41.2016.1.48-69

DO - 10.12759/hsr.41.2016.1.48-69

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 41

SP - 48

EP - 69

JO - Historical Social Research

JF - Historical Social Research

SN - 0172-6404

IS - 1

ER -