Revisiting Carbon Disclosure and Performance: Legitimacy and Management Views

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Revisiting Carbon Disclosure and Performance: Legitimacy and Management Views. / Qian, Wei; Schaltegger, Stefan.
In: The British Accounting Review, Vol. 49, No. 4, 07.2017, p. 365–379.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f0872842db4640b2afcd88d23700984d,
title = "Revisiting Carbon Disclosure and Performance: Legitimacy and Management Views",
abstract = "With corporate disclosure of carbon emissions rapidly increasing, the long-standing question remains whether carbon disclosure has any influence on the improvement of carbon performance. Previous studies of environmental disclosure and performance have predominantly focused on whether disclosure is a substitute for poor performance. Little attention has been devoted to the more important question about how changes in disclosure may lead to subsequent changes in performance over time. Following the rationales taken by the legitimacy and management perspectives, we revisit the relationship between carbon disclosure and performance, with a focus on changes that disclosure may (or may not) create. Using a change analysis of Global 500 companies and their carbon emission and disclosure data released between 2008 and 2012, this study finds that the change in carbon disclosure levels is positively associated with a subsequent change in carbon performance (examined through direct and indirect carbon emission intensities). Thus, regardless of whether disclosure has been used as a legitimising tool for prior poor performance, this study confirms that carbon disclosure motivates companies and creates an {\textquoteleft}outside-in{\textquoteright} driven effect for subsequent change and improvement in carbon performance. However, the association between changes in carbon disclosure and performance is relatively weaker in high energy-intensive firms.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, Carbon disclosure, Carbon performance, Environmental disclosure, environmental performance, Scope 1 emission intensity, Total carbon emission intensity, Carbon disclosure, Carbon performance, Environmental disclosure, environmental performance, Scope 1 emission intensity, Total carbon emission intensity",
author = "Wei Qian and Stefan Schaltegger",
year = "2017",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.bar.2017.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "365–379",
journal = "The British Accounting Review",
issn = "0890-8389",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting Carbon Disclosure and Performance

T2 - Legitimacy and Management Views

AU - Qian, Wei

AU - Schaltegger, Stefan

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - With corporate disclosure of carbon emissions rapidly increasing, the long-standing question remains whether carbon disclosure has any influence on the improvement of carbon performance. Previous studies of environmental disclosure and performance have predominantly focused on whether disclosure is a substitute for poor performance. Little attention has been devoted to the more important question about how changes in disclosure may lead to subsequent changes in performance over time. Following the rationales taken by the legitimacy and management perspectives, we revisit the relationship between carbon disclosure and performance, with a focus on changes that disclosure may (or may not) create. Using a change analysis of Global 500 companies and their carbon emission and disclosure data released between 2008 and 2012, this study finds that the change in carbon disclosure levels is positively associated with a subsequent change in carbon performance (examined through direct and indirect carbon emission intensities). Thus, regardless of whether disclosure has been used as a legitimising tool for prior poor performance, this study confirms that carbon disclosure motivates companies and creates an ‘outside-in’ driven effect for subsequent change and improvement in carbon performance. However, the association between changes in carbon disclosure and performance is relatively weaker in high energy-intensive firms.

AB - With corporate disclosure of carbon emissions rapidly increasing, the long-standing question remains whether carbon disclosure has any influence on the improvement of carbon performance. Previous studies of environmental disclosure and performance have predominantly focused on whether disclosure is a substitute for poor performance. Little attention has been devoted to the more important question about how changes in disclosure may lead to subsequent changes in performance over time. Following the rationales taken by the legitimacy and management perspectives, we revisit the relationship between carbon disclosure and performance, with a focus on changes that disclosure may (or may not) create. Using a change analysis of Global 500 companies and their carbon emission and disclosure data released between 2008 and 2012, this study finds that the change in carbon disclosure levels is positively associated with a subsequent change in carbon performance (examined through direct and indirect carbon emission intensities). Thus, regardless of whether disclosure has been used as a legitimising tool for prior poor performance, this study confirms that carbon disclosure motivates companies and creates an ‘outside-in’ driven effect for subsequent change and improvement in carbon performance. However, the association between changes in carbon disclosure and performance is relatively weaker in high energy-intensive firms.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - Carbon disclosure

KW - Carbon performance

KW - Environmental disclosure

KW - environmental performance

KW - Scope 1 emission intensity

KW - Total carbon emission intensity

KW - Carbon disclosure

KW - Carbon performance

KW - Environmental disclosure

KW - environmental performance

KW - Scope 1 emission intensity

KW - Total carbon emission intensity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019657884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bar.2017.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.bar.2017.05.005

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 49

SP - 365

EP - 379

JO - The British Accounting Review

JF - The British Accounting Review

SN - 0890-8389

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Sudoko mathematics for and done by younger students
  2. Führt Schulinspektion zu besseren Schülerleistungen?
  3. Informationskompetenz in den Bildungswissenschaften
  4. Management Consulting Firms as Institutional Agents
  5. Lernende Regionen durch Regionale Bildungsnetzwerke
  6. Das mehrgliedrige Schulsystem hat noch eine Zukunft
  7. Organizations as Networks of Communication Episodes
  8. Bildungsstandards zwischen Beruf und Wissenschaften
  9. Performanz - ohne Verbesserung der Rahmenbedingungen?
  10. Vom Staunen und ursprünglichen Verstehen im Bewegen
  11. Die Bedeutung von Ökobilanzen in Klinik und Praxis
  12. Die Libellen der Stadt Kaltenkirchen, Kreis Segeberg
  13. Multi-agent systems' asset for smart grid applications
  14. Entwicklung emotionaler Kompetenzen im Vorschulalter
  15. Marketing für Innovationen in der Automobilindustrie
  16. Ökologische Lernpotenziale in Beratung und Therapie
  17. Zur Einführung: Persönlichkeitsförderung im Studium
  18. Neuausrichtung von Rechnungslegung und Prüfungswesen
  19. Sind 250 Jahre Entrepreneurshipforschung schon genug?
  20. Inspektionsbasierte Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung
  21. Wir müssen reden. Roundtablegespräch zur documenta 12
  22. Climate change and society - communicating adaptation
  23. Qualitätssicherung durch studentische Lehrevaluation
  24. Lernkompetenz aufbauen - Verhaltensstörungen abbauen
  25. The educational benefits of technological competence
  26. Political discourse as mediated and public discourse
  27. Schulinspektion - Fluch und Segen externer Evaluation
  28. World Heritage Sites: Boon or Bane? The Case of Venice
  29. Democracy and the global spread of progressive taxes
  30. Was müssen Lehrerinnen und Lehrer wissen und können?
  31. Was müssen Lehrerinnen und Lehrer wissen und können?