Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country. / Tobón, Wolke; Urquiza-Haas, Tania; Koleff, Patricia et al.
In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 31, No. 5, 10.2017, p. 1086-1097.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Tobón, W, Urquiza-Haas, T, Koleff, P, Schröter, M, Ortega-Álvarez, R, Campo, J, Lindig-Cisneros, R, Sarukhán, J & Bonn, A 2017, 'Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country', Conservation Biology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1086-1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12918

APA

Tobón, W., Urquiza-Haas, T., Koleff, P., Schröter, M., Ortega-Álvarez, R., Campo, J., Lindig-Cisneros, R., Sarukhán, J., & Bonn, A. (2017). Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country. Conservation Biology, 31(5), 1086-1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12918

Vancouver

Tobón W, Urquiza-Haas T, Koleff P, Schröter M, Ortega-Álvarez R, Campo J et al. Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country. Conservation Biology. 2017 Oct;31(5):1086-1097. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12918

Bibtex

@article{e5affc830dc042c1b3281b6c2edca888,
title = "Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country",
abstract = "Ecological restoration has become an important strategy to conserve biodiversity and ecosystems services. To restore 15% of degraded ecosystems as stipulated by the Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi target 15, we developed a prioritization framework to identify potential priority sites for restoration in Mexico, a megadiverse country. We used the most current biological and environmental data on Mexico to assess areas of biological importance and restoration feasibility at national scale and engaged stakeholders and experts throughout the process. We integrated 8 criteria into 2 components (i.e., biological importance and restoration feasibility) in a spatial multicriteria analysis and generated 11 scenarios to test the effect of assigning different component weights. The priority restoration sites were distributed across all terrestrial ecosystems of Mexico; 64.1% were in degraded natural vegetation and 6% were in protected areas. Our results provide a spatial guide to where restoration could enhance the persistence of species of conservation concern and vulnerable ecosystems while maximizing the likelihood of restoration success. Such spatial prioritization is a first step in informing policy makers and restoration planners where to focus local and large-scale restoration efforts, which should additionally incorporate social and monetary cost–benefit considerations.",
keywords = "an{\'a}lisis espacial multicriterio, factibilida de restauraci{\'o}n, key biodiversity sites, participatory process, planificaci{\'o}n sistem{\'a}tica de la conservaci{\'o}n, proceso participativo, restoration feasibility, sitios clave de biodiversidad, spatial multicriteria analysis, systematic conservation planning, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Wolke Tob{\'o}n and Tania Urquiza-Haas and Patricia Koleff and Matthias Schr{\"o}ter and Rub{\'e}n Ortega-{\'A}lvarez and Julio Campo and Roberto Lindig-Cisneros and Jos{\'e} Sarukh{\'a}n and Aletta Bonn",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1111/cobi.12918",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1086--1097",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country

AU - Tobón, Wolke

AU - Urquiza-Haas, Tania

AU - Koleff, Patricia

AU - Schröter, Matthias

AU - Ortega-Álvarez, Rubén

AU - Campo, Julio

AU - Lindig-Cisneros, Roberto

AU - Sarukhán, José

AU - Bonn, Aletta

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Ecological restoration has become an important strategy to conserve biodiversity and ecosystems services. To restore 15% of degraded ecosystems as stipulated by the Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi target 15, we developed a prioritization framework to identify potential priority sites for restoration in Mexico, a megadiverse country. We used the most current biological and environmental data on Mexico to assess areas of biological importance and restoration feasibility at national scale and engaged stakeholders and experts throughout the process. We integrated 8 criteria into 2 components (i.e., biological importance and restoration feasibility) in a spatial multicriteria analysis and generated 11 scenarios to test the effect of assigning different component weights. The priority restoration sites were distributed across all terrestrial ecosystems of Mexico; 64.1% were in degraded natural vegetation and 6% were in protected areas. Our results provide a spatial guide to where restoration could enhance the persistence of species of conservation concern and vulnerable ecosystems while maximizing the likelihood of restoration success. Such spatial prioritization is a first step in informing policy makers and restoration planners where to focus local and large-scale restoration efforts, which should additionally incorporate social and monetary cost–benefit considerations.

AB - Ecological restoration has become an important strategy to conserve biodiversity and ecosystems services. To restore 15% of degraded ecosystems as stipulated by the Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi target 15, we developed a prioritization framework to identify potential priority sites for restoration in Mexico, a megadiverse country. We used the most current biological and environmental data on Mexico to assess areas of biological importance and restoration feasibility at national scale and engaged stakeholders and experts throughout the process. We integrated 8 criteria into 2 components (i.e., biological importance and restoration feasibility) in a spatial multicriteria analysis and generated 11 scenarios to test the effect of assigning different component weights. The priority restoration sites were distributed across all terrestrial ecosystems of Mexico; 64.1% were in degraded natural vegetation and 6% were in protected areas. Our results provide a spatial guide to where restoration could enhance the persistence of species of conservation concern and vulnerable ecosystems while maximizing the likelihood of restoration success. Such spatial prioritization is a first step in informing policy makers and restoration planners where to focus local and large-scale restoration efforts, which should additionally incorporate social and monetary cost–benefit considerations.

KW - análisis espacial multicriterio

KW - factibilida de restauración

KW - key biodiversity sites

KW - participatory process

KW - planificación sistemática de la conservación

KW - proceso participativo

KW - restoration feasibility

KW - sitios clave de biodiversidad

KW - spatial multicriteria analysis

KW - systematic conservation planning

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021664420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/10a48b17-49b3-38e4-b29d-a195ee846a05/

U2 - 10.1111/cobi.12918

DO - 10.1111/cobi.12918

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 28233917

AN - SCOPUS:85021664420

VL - 31

SP - 1086

EP - 1097

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 5

ER -

DOI