Reconciling Scientific, Political and Participatory Perspectives on Sustainable Tourism Indicator Development for Destination Sustainability Assessment
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Tourism Planning and Development, Vol. 21, No. 6, 11.2024, p. 682-702.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconciling Scientific, Political and Participatory Perspectives on Sustainable Tourism Indicator Development for Destination Sustainability Assessment
AU - Eckert, Elena
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Sustainable tourism indicators (STI) are widely recognized as a useful tool for assessing the sustainability level of a tourism destination. Methods for STI development, however, are still inconsistent and often characterized by a debate between approaches proposed by three parties: scientists, policy-makers and supporters of participatory decision-making. Despite the development of approaches that address this debate, there has been little agreement on the broader methodological and conceptual foundations of STI development. In the pursuit of finding consensus, a Delphi survey is conducted in which an expert panel assesses and discusses the potential of innovative hybrid methodologies. Findings emphasise a shift towards more participatory formats and show that the requirements of all three parties can be met. This study advances future STI development processes by structuring the debate, evaluating existing and new approaches and exemplifying how to conceptualize formats to facilitate local involvement, thereby mapping out future pathways for STI development.
AB - Sustainable tourism indicators (STI) are widely recognized as a useful tool for assessing the sustainability level of a tourism destination. Methods for STI development, however, are still inconsistent and often characterized by a debate between approaches proposed by three parties: scientists, policy-makers and supporters of participatory decision-making. Despite the development of approaches that address this debate, there has been little agreement on the broader methodological and conceptual foundations of STI development. In the pursuit of finding consensus, a Delphi survey is conducted in which an expert panel assesses and discusses the potential of innovative hybrid methodologies. Findings emphasise a shift towards more participatory formats and show that the requirements of all three parties can be met. This study advances future STI development processes by structuring the debate, evaluating existing and new approaches and exemplifying how to conceptualize formats to facilitate local involvement, thereby mapping out future pathways for STI development.
KW - assessment
KW - community participation
KW - Delphi survey
KW - indicators
KW - Sustainable tourism
KW - Management studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140119170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/03366a10-5d5c-35fd-b865-412a8f2c7ac0/
U2 - 10.1080/21568316.2022.2134198
DO - 10.1080/21568316.2022.2134198
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85140119170
VL - 21
SP - 682
EP - 702
JO - Tourism Planning and Development
JF - Tourism Planning and Development
SN - 2156-8316
IS - 6
ER -