Public boards: Questions of representation on supervisory boards of german, austrian and swiss theatres
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: International Journal of Arts Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.09.2021, p. 32-47.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Public boards
T2 - Questions of representation on supervisory boards of german, austrian and swiss theatres
AU - Heskia, Thomas
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - Governance of theatres in German-speaking countries has been studied primarily in relation to their powerful artistic directors. However, the author suggests that their power relates to the weakness of the supervisory bodies. He analyzes the role of the supervisory boards of 153 theatres in Germany, Austria and German-speaking Switzerland to explain why the specific history of the theatres as outsourced public institutions, their different legal structure, administrative federalism in Germany and cultural differences have led to the lack of comparable standards across regional jurisdictions. Despite far-reaching structural changes in recent decades, governance appears to need further development. This article explains why overall control still lies in government structures rather than in supervisory boards, why diversity is almost completely lacking, and why even a well-designed supervisory structure cannot prevent a governance crisis in theatre.
AB - Governance of theatres in German-speaking countries has been studied primarily in relation to their powerful artistic directors. However, the author suggests that their power relates to the weakness of the supervisory bodies. He analyzes the role of the supervisory boards of 153 theatres in Germany, Austria and German-speaking Switzerland to explain why the specific history of the theatres as outsourced public institutions, their different legal structure, administrative federalism in Germany and cultural differences have led to the lack of comparable standards across regional jurisdictions. Despite far-reaching structural changes in recent decades, governance appears to need further development. This article explains why overall control still lies in government structures rather than in supervisory boards, why diversity is almost completely lacking, and why even a well-designed supervisory structure cannot prevent a governance crisis in theatre.
KW - Boards
KW - Germany/Austria/Switzerland
KW - Governance
KW - Legal forms
KW - Public corporate governance
KW - Repertory system
KW - Theatre
KW - Cultural Distribution/Cultural Organization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118685130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85118685130
VL - 24
SP - 32
EP - 47
JO - International Journal of Arts Management
JF - International Journal of Arts Management
SN - 1480-8986
IS - 1
ER -