Project ARBRE: Lessons for bio-energy developers and policy-makers
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Energy Policy, Vol. 36, No. 6, 06.2008, p. 2044-2050.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Project ARBRE
T2 - Lessons for bio-energy developers and policy-makers
AU - Piterou, Athena
AU - Shackley, Simon
AU - Upham, Paul
PY - 2008/6
Y1 - 2008/6
N2 - Project Arable Biomass Renewable Energy (ARBRE) was a 'flagship' project in the UK to demonstrate electricity generation from dedicated energy crops, employing the high efficiency of gasification combined cycle technology while also contributing to the waste management problem of sewage disposal. The plant never reached commercial operation and this paper provides the first detailed public account of the reasons, drawing on interviews with the main actors. Project ARBRE failed due to three unfortunate developments: the withdrawal for reasons of commercial strategy of the main company that initiated and financed the project; bankruptcy of the turnkey contractor appointed to oversee the project; and technical problems with the gasification technology, which could not be resolved within the financial and time constraints. All these factors acted in reinforcing manner and they were individually preventable: documenting the process of failure is a learning experience that can prevent their recurrence.
AB - Project Arable Biomass Renewable Energy (ARBRE) was a 'flagship' project in the UK to demonstrate electricity generation from dedicated energy crops, employing the high efficiency of gasification combined cycle technology while also contributing to the waste management problem of sewage disposal. The plant never reached commercial operation and this paper provides the first detailed public account of the reasons, drawing on interviews with the main actors. Project ARBRE failed due to three unfortunate developments: the withdrawal for reasons of commercial strategy of the main company that initiated and financed the project; bankruptcy of the turnkey contractor appointed to oversee the project; and technical problems with the gasification technology, which could not be resolved within the financial and time constraints. All these factors acted in reinforcing manner and they were individually preventable: documenting the process of failure is a learning experience that can prevent their recurrence.
KW - ARBRE
KW - Bio-energy
KW - Project management
KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43349098164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.022
DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.022
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:43349098164
VL - 36
SP - 2044
EP - 2050
JO - Energy Policy
JF - Energy Policy
SN - 0301-4215
IS - 6
ER -