Professional Judges’ Disbelief in Free Will Does Not Decrease Punishment
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.04.2021, p. 357-362.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Professional Judges’ Disbelief in Free Will Does Not Decrease Punishment
AU - Genschow, Oliver
AU - Hawickhorst, Heinz
AU - Rigoni, Davide
AU - Aschermann, Ellen
AU - Brass, Marcel
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - There is a debate in psychology and philosophy on the societal consequences of casting doubts about individuals’ belief in free will. Research suggests that experimentally reducing free will beliefs might affect how individuals evaluate others’ behavior. Past research has demonstrated that reduced free will beliefs decrease laypersons’ tendency toward retributive punishment. This finding has been used as an argument for the idea that promoting anti-free will viewpoints in the public media might have severe consequences for the legal system because it may move judges toward softer retributive punishments. However, actual implications for the legal system can only be drawn by investigating professional judges. In the present research, we investigated whether judges (N = 87) are affected by reading anti-free will messages. The results demonstrate that although reading anti-free will texts reduces judges’ belief in free will, their recommended sentences are not influenced by their (manipulated) belief in free will.
AB - There is a debate in psychology and philosophy on the societal consequences of casting doubts about individuals’ belief in free will. Research suggests that experimentally reducing free will beliefs might affect how individuals evaluate others’ behavior. Past research has demonstrated that reduced free will beliefs decrease laypersons’ tendency toward retributive punishment. This finding has been used as an argument for the idea that promoting anti-free will viewpoints in the public media might have severe consequences for the legal system because it may move judges toward softer retributive punishments. However, actual implications for the legal system can only be drawn by investigating professional judges. In the present research, we investigated whether judges (N = 87) are affected by reading anti-free will messages. The results demonstrate that although reading anti-free will texts reduces judges’ belief in free will, their recommended sentences are not influenced by their (manipulated) belief in free will.
KW - Business psychology
KW - belief in free will
KW - judges
KW - offenders
KW - punishment
KW - social perception
KW - belief in free will
KW - judges
KW - offenders
KW - punishment
KW - social perception
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086251988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5905cd16-fa8d-3b21-a198-2dda0dcc6e94/
U2 - 10.1177/1948550620915055
DO - 10.1177/1948550620915055
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85086251988
VL - 12
SP - 357
EP - 362
JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science
JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science
SN - 1948-5506
IS - 3
ER -