Practice and carryover effects when using small interaction devices
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 42, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 437-444.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Practice and carryover effects when using small interaction devices
AU - Sutter, C.
AU - Oehl, Michael
AU - Armbrüster, C.
PY - 2011/3
Y1 - 2011/3
N2 - The use of interaction devices in modern work often challenges the human motor system, especially when these devices introduce unfamiliar transformations to the user. In this paper we evaluated expert performance and skill differences between experts and novices when using small motion- and force-controlled interaction devices (touchpad and mini-joystick) in an applied text-editing task. Firstly, experts performed better with their familiar input device than with an unfamiliar one. Particularly touchpad experts operating the unfamiliar mini-joystick showed highly asymmetric carryover costs. Results showed that the efficient performance of experts depended on domain-specific skills, which were not transferable. Secondly, with considerable practice (more than observed for simple and short tasks) novices were brought up to higher levels of performance. The motion-transformation between hand and cursor action was easier in understanding and application than the force-transformation. Thus, the touchpad was used more efficiently than the mini-joystick. In conclusion, practice effects found so far are considerably underestimated when it comes to an applied task. The results give reason to develop and implement skill-sensitive training procedures, since the acquisition of domain-specific skills is critical for expert performance. As a consequence, training procedures might be essential for complex applications and/or unfamiliar device transformations.
AB - The use of interaction devices in modern work often challenges the human motor system, especially when these devices introduce unfamiliar transformations to the user. In this paper we evaluated expert performance and skill differences between experts and novices when using small motion- and force-controlled interaction devices (touchpad and mini-joystick) in an applied text-editing task. Firstly, experts performed better with their familiar input device than with an unfamiliar one. Particularly touchpad experts operating the unfamiliar mini-joystick showed highly asymmetric carryover costs. Results showed that the efficient performance of experts depended on domain-specific skills, which were not transferable. Secondly, with considerable practice (more than observed for simple and short tasks) novices were brought up to higher levels of performance. The motion-transformation between hand and cursor action was easier in understanding and application than the force-transformation. Thus, the touchpad was used more efficiently than the mini-joystick. In conclusion, practice effects found so far are considerably underestimated when it comes to an applied task. The results give reason to develop and implement skill-sensitive training procedures, since the acquisition of domain-specific skills is critical for expert performance. As a consequence, training procedures might be essential for complex applications and/or unfamiliar device transformations.
KW - Business psychology
KW - Sensorimotor transformation
KW - tool use
KW - applied dragging task
KW - expert
KW - human-computer interaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649908288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.001
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 20934683
VL - 42
SP - 437
EP - 444
JO - Applied Ergonomics
JF - Applied Ergonomics
SN - 0003-6870
IS - 3
ER -