Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap. / Knuff, Anna K.; Winiger, Nathalie; Klein, Alexandra Maria et al.
In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 10, No. 10, 01.10.2019, p. 1820-1825.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Knuff AK, Winiger N, Klein AM, Segelbacher G, Staab M. Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2019 Oct 1;10(10):1820-1825. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

Bibtex

@article{0cadc77ae7f5494faaf9c55ed5c874d0,
title = "Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap",
abstract = "Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.",
keywords = "arthropod diversity, biodiversity inventory, flight interception trap, insect sampling, monitoring, temperate forest, window trap, Biology, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Knuff, {Anna K.} and Nathalie Winiger and Klein, {Alexandra Maria} and Gernot Segelbacher and Michael Staab",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution {\textcopyright} 2019 British Ecological Society",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/2041-210X.13258",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1820--1825",
journal = "Methods in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2041-210X",
publisher = "British Ecological Society",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap

AU - Knuff, Anna K.

AU - Winiger, Nathalie

AU - Klein, Alexandra Maria

AU - Segelbacher, Gernot

AU - Staab, Michael

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2019 British Ecological Society

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.

AB - Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.

KW - arthropod diversity

KW - biodiversity inventory

KW - flight interception trap

KW - insect sampling

KW - monitoring

KW - temperate forest

KW - window trap

KW - Biology

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069803662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

DO - 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85069803662

VL - 10

SP - 1820

EP - 1825

JO - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2041-210X

IS - 10

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Enhancing Performance of Level System Modeling with Pseudo-Random Signals
  2. Neural Combinatorial Optimization on Heterogeneous Graphs
  3. Transformer with Tree-order Encoding for Neural Program Generation
  4. Using Local and Global Self-Evaluations to Predict Students' Problem Solving Behaviour
  5. Evaluating the construct validity of Objective Personality Tests using a multitrait-multimethod-Multioccasion-(MTMM-MO)-approach
  6. Development of a quality assurance framework for the open source development model
  7. Constructions and Reconstructions. The Architectural Image between Rendering and Photography
  8. Analyzing different types of moderated method effects in confirmatory factor models for structurally different methods
  9. Evaluating OWL 2 reasoners in the context of checking entity-relationship diagrams during software development
  10. The elicitation process in developing of case library for Case-Based Reasoner system whilst consideration for validating electronic communication technologies
  11. Concept for Process Parameter-Based Inline Quality Control as a Basis for Pairing in a Production Line
  12. Using the flatness of DC-Drives to emulate a generator for a decoupled MPC using a geometric approach for motion control in Robotino
  13. A discrete-time fractional order PI controller for a three phase synchronous motor using an optimal loop shaping approach
  14. Design and Control of an Inductive Power Transmission System with AC-AC Converter for a Constant Output Current
  15. A Control Scheme for PMSMs using Model Predictive Control and a Feedforward Action in the Presence of Saturated Inputs
  16. Intersection tests for the cointegrating rank in dependent panel data
  17. PLM ‑supported automated process planning and partitioning for collaborative assembly processes based on a capability analysis
  18. GPU-accelerated meshfree computational framework for modeling the friction surfacing process
  19. Dispatching rule selection with Gaussian processes
  20. A model predictive control in Robotino and its implementation using ROS system
  21. A transfer operator based computational study of mixing processes in open flow systems
  22. Analysis and comparison of two finite element algorithms for dislocation density based crystal plasticity
  23. Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap
  24. Interpreting Strings, Weaving Threads
  25. A New Framework for Production Planning and Control to Support the Positioning in Fields of Tension Created by Opposing Logistic Objectives
  26. Human–learning–machines: introduction to a special section on how cybernetics and constructivism inspired new forms of learning
  27. Exploration strategies, performance, and error consequences when learning a complex computer task
  28. The Use of Genetic Algorithm for PID Controller Auto-Tuning in ARM CORTEX M4 Platform
  29. Lyapunov stability analysis to set up a PI controller for a mass flow system in case of a non-saturating input
  30. Empowering materials processing and performance from data and AI
  31. Volume of Imbalance Container Prediction using Kalman Filter and Long Short-Term Memory
  32. Changing the Administration from within:
  33. Using cross-recurrence quantification analysis to compute similarity measures for time series of unequal length with applications to sleep stage analysis
  34. Contributions of declarative and procedural memory to accuracy and automatization during second language practice
  35. Using Decision Trees and Reinforcement Learning for the Dynamic Adjustment of Composite Sequencing Rules in a Flexible Manufacturing System
  36. A fast sequential injection analysis system for the simultaneous determination of ammonia and phosphate
  37. On the Functional Controllability Using a Geometric Approach together with a Decoupled MPC for Motion Control in Robotino
  38. On the Power and Performance of a Doubly Latent Residual Approach to Explain Latent Specific Factors in Multilevel-Bifactor-(S-1) Models