Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap. / Knuff, Anna K.; Winiger, Nathalie; Klein, Alexandra Maria et al.
In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 10, No. 10, 01.10.2019, p. 1820-1825.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Knuff AK, Winiger N, Klein AM, Segelbacher G, Staab M. Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2019 Oct 1;10(10):1820-1825. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

Bibtex

@article{0cadc77ae7f5494faaf9c55ed5c874d0,
title = "Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap",
abstract = "Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.",
keywords = "arthropod diversity, biodiversity inventory, flight interception trap, insect sampling, monitoring, temperate forest, window trap, Biology, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Knuff, {Anna K.} and Nathalie Winiger and Klein, {Alexandra Maria} and Gernot Segelbacher and Michael Staab",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution {\textcopyright} 2019 British Ecological Society",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/2041-210X.13258",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1820--1825",
journal = "Methods in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2041-210X",
publisher = "British Ecological Society",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap

AU - Knuff, Anna K.

AU - Winiger, Nathalie

AU - Klein, Alexandra Maria

AU - Segelbacher, Gernot

AU - Staab, Michael

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2019 British Ecological Society

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.

AB - Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.

KW - arthropod diversity

KW - biodiversity inventory

KW - flight interception trap

KW - insect sampling

KW - monitoring

KW - temperate forest

KW - window trap

KW - Biology

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069803662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

DO - 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85069803662

VL - 10

SP - 1820

EP - 1825

JO - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2041-210X

IS - 10

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Development of a quality assurance framework for the open source development model
  2. Using the flatness of DC-Drives to emulate a generator for a decoupled MPC using a geometric approach for motion control in Robotino
  3. A discrete-time fractional order PI controller for a three phase synchronous motor using an optimal loop shaping approach
  4. GPU-accelerated meshfree computational framework for modeling the friction surfacing process
  5. A transfer operator based computational study of mixing processes in open flow systems
  6. Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Processes and Products of Discourse
  7. Modified dynamic programming approach for offline segmentation of long hydrometeorological time series
  8. Contributions of declarative and procedural memory to accuracy and automatization during second language practice
  9. On the Power and Performance of a Doubly Latent Residual Approach to Explain Latent Specific Factors in Multilevel-Bifactor-(S-1) Models
  10. A model predictive control for an aggregate actuator with a self-tuning initial condition procedure in combustion engines
  11. Foundations and applications of computer based material flow networks for einvironmental management
  12. Effectiveness of a guided multicomponent internet and mobile gratitude training program - A pragmatic randomized controlled trial
  13. A Review of Latent Variable Modeling Using R - A Step-by-Step-Guide
  14. Model inversion using fuzzy neural network with boosting of the solution
  15. Top-down contingent attentional capture during feed-forward visual processing
  16. Applied quality assurance methods under the open source development model
  17. Exploiting linear partial information for optimal use of forecasts. With an application to U.S. economic policy
  18. The role of reading time complexity and reading speed in text comprehension
  19. An application of multiple behavior SIA for analyzing data from student exams
  20. Making an Impression Through Openness
  21. Proceedings of TextGraphs-17: Graph-based Methods for Natural Language Processing
  22. Design and characterization of an EOG signal acquisition system based on the programming of saccadic movement routines
  23. Q-Adaptive Control of the nonlinear dynamics of the cantilever-sample system of an Atomic Force Microscope
  24. Topic Embeddings – A New Approach to Classify Very Short Documents Based on Predefined Topics
  25. Grazing, exploring and networking for sustainability-oriented innovations in learning-action networks
  26. Globally asymptotic output feedback tracking of robot manipulators with actuator constraints
  27. Lyapunov stability analysis to set up a PI controller for a mass flow system in case of a non-saturating input
  28. Modeling of Logistic Processes in Assembly Areas
  29. Different kinds of interactive exercises with response analysis on the web
  30. Species composition and forest structure explain the temperature sensitivity patterns of productivity in temperate forests
  31. Facing complexity through informed simplifications
  32. Measuring cognitive load with subjective rating scales during problem solving
  33. Hierarchical trait filtering at different spatial scales determines beetle assemblages in deadwood