Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap. / Knuff, Anna K.; Winiger, Nathalie; Klein, Alexandra Maria et al.
In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 10, No. 10, 01.10.2019, p. 1820-1825.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Knuff AK, Winiger N, Klein AM, Segelbacher G, Staab M. Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2019 Oct 1;10(10):1820-1825. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

Bibtex

@article{0cadc77ae7f5494faaf9c55ed5c874d0,
title = "Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap",
abstract = "Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.",
keywords = "arthropod diversity, biodiversity inventory, flight interception trap, insect sampling, monitoring, temperate forest, window trap, Biology, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Knuff, {Anna K.} and Nathalie Winiger and Klein, {Alexandra Maria} and Gernot Segelbacher and Michael Staab",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution {\textcopyright} 2019 British Ecological Society",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/2041-210X.13258",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1820--1825",
journal = "Methods in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2041-210X",
publisher = "British Ecological Society",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap

AU - Knuff, Anna K.

AU - Winiger, Nathalie

AU - Klein, Alexandra Maria

AU - Segelbacher, Gernot

AU - Staab, Michael

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2019 British Ecological Society

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.

AB - Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.

KW - arthropod diversity

KW - biodiversity inventory

KW - flight interception trap

KW - insect sampling

KW - monitoring

KW - temperate forest

KW - window trap

KW - Biology

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069803662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

DO - 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85069803662

VL - 10

SP - 1820

EP - 1825

JO - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2041-210X

IS - 10

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Plant composition, not richness, drives occurrence of specialist herbivores
  2. Sozialpolitik und soziale Lage in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz
  3. Energy-Capital-Labor Substitution and the Economic Effects of CO2 Abatement
  4. The Structure of Student Interest in Computers and Information Technology
  5. Biodiversity buffers pollination from changes in environmental conditions
  6. Insect abundance in managed forests benefits from multi-layered vegetation
  7. Exhibition of a Scarf—Daniel Buren, Hermès Éditeur: Photos-souvenirs au carré
  8. Validierung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung der Anzahl von Telefonnummern
  9. Habitat suitability models in conservation planning – a short introduction
  10. Vegetation responses to environmental conditions in floodplain grasslands
  11. „Das ewig Dauernde in uns“. Immanenz und Transzendenz in Stifters Nachsommer
  12. Repositionierungen: Von Machtverschiebungen im Kapitalismus und Feminismus
  13. Set oriented computation of transport rates in 3-degree of freedom systems
  14. Implementation of a Blended-Learning Course as Part of Faculty Development
  15. Climate Policy Cooperation Games between Developed and Developing Nations
  16. Management of Biodiversity in Protected Areas with Sustainability Control
  17. Landscape factors affecting Parakeet damage to sunflower fields in Israel
  18. Design of finger joint implants based on triply periodic minimal surfaces
  19. Ansatzpunkte zur Integration von Umweltaspekten in die „Balanced Scorecard“
  20. A new vision of sustainable management in mining and post-mining landscapes
  21. Prerequisites and the Success of Transformative Entrepreneurship Education
  22. Controller und Nachhaltigkeit im Kontext neuer Berichterstattungspflichten
  23. Global Consciousness Predicts Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic
  24. Setting the agenda for climate assemblies. Trade-offs and guiding principles
  25. Facultative Mixity and the European Union’s Trade and Investment Agreements
  26. Die Weiterbildung zum "Zertifikat Waldpädagogik" in Sachsen-Anhalt 2007 - 2008
  27. Does it Pay to Be Eco-Efficient in the European Electricity Supply Industry?
  28. Recht und Finanzierung von Erneuerbaren Energien: Bürgerbeteiligungsmodelle
  29. 20 years of performance measurement in sustainable supply chain management
  30. Geschichten und Geschichte, Isebel als literarische und historische Gestalt