Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap. / Knuff, Anna K.; Winiger, Nathalie; Klein, Alexandra Maria et al.
In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 10, No. 10, 01.10.2019, p. 1820-1825.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Knuff AK, Winiger N, Klein AM, Segelbacher G, Staab M. Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2019 Oct 1;10(10):1820-1825. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

Bibtex

@article{0cadc77ae7f5494faaf9c55ed5c874d0,
title = "Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap",
abstract = "Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.",
keywords = "arthropod diversity, biodiversity inventory, flight interception trap, insect sampling, monitoring, temperate forest, window trap, Biology, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Knuff, {Anna K.} and Nathalie Winiger and Klein, {Alexandra Maria} and Gernot Segelbacher and Michael Staab",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution {\textcopyright} 2019 British Ecological Society",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/2041-210X.13258",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1820--1825",
journal = "Methods in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2041-210X",
publisher = "British Ecological Society",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap

AU - Knuff, Anna K.

AU - Winiger, Nathalie

AU - Klein, Alexandra Maria

AU - Segelbacher, Gernot

AU - Staab, Michael

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2019 British Ecological Society

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.

AB - Insect populations are globally declining but standardized long-term data to evaluate trends and consequences are largely missing. One difficulty among many is the rather narrow taxonomic cover of most conventional trap types, which makes the use of several complementary collection methods necessary to achieve comprehensive coverage. To avoid the effort associated with operating multiple traps, we demonstrate how to modify window traps in a simple and standardizable way to capture a wider range of flying insect taxa. While a typical window trap only has a collection unit below the windows, we added an additional collection unit on top of the windows. We tested this modified trap design in 135 study plots in a temperate forest over 5 months and compared trap catches between top and bottom collection units. The top collection unit captured considerably more individuals of Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, Auchenorrhyncha and Thysanoptera than the bottom collection unit. In contrast, there were more individuals of Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Sternorrhyncha and Psocoptera in the bottom collection unit. Both collection units captured a highly distinct insect community and patterns were consistent throughout the season. These modified traps are suitable for collecting a broader range of flying insects compared to conventional window traps. The additional top unit is fast and easy to build and the traps require little maintenance while operating in the field. These characteristics make modified window traps with top and bottom collection units a promising tool for standardized and replicable biodiversity studies covering a broad range of insect taxa.

KW - arthropod diversity

KW - biodiversity inventory

KW - flight interception trap

KW - insect sampling

KW - monitoring

KW - temperate forest

KW - window trap

KW - Biology

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069803662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

DO - 10.1111/2041-210X.13258

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85069803662

VL - 10

SP - 1820

EP - 1825

JO - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2041-210X

IS - 10

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. A Quadrant Approach of Camera Calibration Method for Depth Estimation Using a Stereo Vision System
  2. Analysis and Implementation of a Resistance Temperature Estimator Based on Bi-Polynomial Least Squares Method and Discrete Kalman Filter
  3. Analyzing User Journey Data In Digital Health: Predicting Dropout From A Digital CBT-I Intervention
  4. The Use of Factorization and Multimode Parametric Spectra in Estimating Frequency and Spectral Parameters of Signal
  5. Structure and dynamics laboratory testing of an indirectly controlled full variable valve train for camless engines
  6. Implementing ERP systems in multinational projects
  7. OKBQA framework towards an open collaboration for development of natural language question-answering systems over knowledge bases
  8. Agency and structure in a sociotechnical transition
  9. Quality Assurance Methods and the Open Source Model
  10. NH4+ ad-/desorption in sequencing batch reactors
  11. Is too much help an obstacle? Effects of interactivity and cognitive style on learning with dynamic versus non-dynamic visualizations with narrative explanations
  12. Facing complexity through informed simplifications
  13. Hierarchical trait filtering at different spatial scales determines beetle assemblages in deadwood
  14. Accounting and Modeling as Design Metaphors for CEMIS
  15. A guided simulated annealing search for solving the pick-up and delivery problem with time windows and capacity constraints
  16. A Lean Convolutional Neural Network for Vehicle Classification
  17. HAWK - hybrid question answering using linked data
  18. Modelling and implementation of an Order2Cash Process in distributed systems
  19. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Students’ Self-report Checklist of Social and Learning Behaviour (SSL)
  20. Interactive Media as Fields of Transduction
  21. Using data mining techniques to investigate the correlation between surface cracks and flange lengths in deep drawn sheet metals
  22. From entity to process
  23. Geometric structures for the parameterization of non-interacting dynamics for multi-body mechanisms
  24. Predicate‐based model of problem‐solving for robotic actions planning
  25. Vergütung, variable
  26. Mechanism of dynamic recrystallization and evolution of texture in the hot working domains of the processing map for Mg-4Al-2Ba-2Ca Alloy
  27. A cascade controller structure using an internal PID controller for a hybrid piezo-hydraulic actuator in camless internal combustion engines
  28. Editorial: Machine Learning and Data Mining in Materials Science
  29. Computing regression statistics from grouped data
  30. Quantum Computing and the Analog/Digital Distinction
  31. The representative turn in EU studies
  32. Temporal dynamics of conflict monitoring and the effects of one or two conflict sources on error-(related) negativity
  33. Users’ handedness and performance when controlling integrated input devices
  34. Differences in adjustment flexibility between regular and temporary agency work
  35. Modelling, explaining, enacting and getting feedback: How can the acquisition of core practices in teacher education be optimally fostered?
  36. Petri net based EMIS-mappers for flexible manufacturing systems
  37. An Overview of Electro Hydraulic Full Variable Valve Train Systems to Reduce Emissions in Internal Combustion Engines
  38. Reciprocal Relationships Between Dispositional Optimism and Work Experiences
  39. A dialectical perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity
  40. A Lyapunov Approach to Set the Parameters of a PI-Controller to Minimise Velocity Oscillations in a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Using Chopper Control for Electrical Vehicles
  41. Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology