Not Feeling Good in STEM: Effects of Stereotype Activation and Anticipated Affect on Women’s Career Aspirations

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Despite great efforts to increase women’s participation in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), relatively few women choose careers in these fields. We argue that women might expect to feel less good in contexts where unfavorable gender stereotypes are activated in their minds (e.g., by strong underrepresentation) and, consequently, are less likely to aspire to STEM careers. In two pilot studies (Ns = 28/61), we confirmed that undergraduate women expect more negative and less positive affect (i.e., generally (un)pleasant emotions) and a heightened sense of threat in a stereotype-activating, compared to a not stereotype-activating, test scenario. In Study 1 (N = 102), the scenario indirectly lowered college women’s STEM career aspiration (adjusted for preliminary domain identification) due to lower anticipated positive affect, but not to higher negative affect, in the stereotype-activating scenario. The scenario had no detrimental effect on college men’s anticipated affect or their career aspirations. In Study 2, 91 high school students reported anticipated affect and self-efficacy in different university majors and their intentions to choose the subject as a major. The more stereotypically male (in terms of gender distribution) the subject, the more negative and the less positive was young women’s, but not young men’s, anticipated affect. Only lower positive, but not higher negative, affect predicted low study intentions over and above self-efficacy. To increase women’s aspirations, their expected feelings in STEM deserve attention. One approach to foster positive affect might be to create less stereotypical STEM contexts.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSex Roles
Volume76
Issue number1-2
Pages (from-to)40-55
Number of pages16
ISSN0360-0025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2017
Externally publishedYes

    Research areas

  • Anticipated affect, Emotional responses, Gender, Gender distribution, Human sex differences, Motivation, Occupational aspiration, Self-efficacy, Sex roles, STEM, Stereotype threat
  • Psychology

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Treating the nestedness temperature calculator as a "black box" can lead to false conclusions
  2. Bird community responses to the edge between suburbs and reserves
  3. The edge of virtual communities ?
  4. A suite of multiplexed microsatellite loci for the ground beetle Abax parallelepipedus (Piller and Mitterpacher, 1783) (Coleoptera, Carabidae)
  5. The German Welfare System and the Continuity of Change
  6. On the way to greener ionic liquids
  7. Chapter 9: Particular Remedies for Non-performance: Section 5: Damages and Interest
  8. Links between RCEs and Higher Education Institutions
  9. Schulleitungsmonitor Schweiz 2022
  10. An Im(Possible) Program
  11. Common Ground and Development
  12. Anmerkung zu EuGH Rs. C-555/07 (Kücükdeveci)
  13. Spatial scaling of extinction rates
  14. Governance im Wandel
  15. Oder/Denken
  16. Seth Price. Decimating Digital Data
  17. Medienpolitik in der EU
  18. The Welcomers
  19. Gods of tomorrow?
  20. Das fossile Imperium schlägt zurück
  21. Qualitätsentwicklung und Qualitätssicherung in der Schreibzentrumsarbeit
  22. Medizinische Forschung an Kindern
  23. Special issue: Exports, imports, and productivity at the firm level
  24. Mountain roads and non-native species modify elevational patterns of plant diversity
  25. Anders als die anderen?
  26. Selbstbestimmung und Classroom-Management
  27. Reduction of Atmospheric Transboundary Fluxes of Heavy Metals in Europe
  28. Pragmatism, Truth and Social Accounting Research
  29. LehrerInnen als "Reflective Practitioner"
  30. Learning from Co-Founders of Grassroots Initiatives
  31. Web-based depression treatment
  32. Linkshändigkeit als Privileg oder Nachteil bei Notebookeingabegeräten?
  33. Feldstudie zur Entwicklung der Rechenfertigkeit von Erstklässlern.
  34. Global, lokal, digital
  35. Moralphilosophische Fragen zum "Embryo"
  36. Was tun?
  37. Finance is Society!