Non-native Douglas fir promotes epigeal spider density, but has a mixed effect on functional diversity

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Non-native Douglas fir promotes epigeal spider density, but has a mixed effect on functional diversity. / Matevski, Dragan; Schuldt, Andreas.
In: Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 32, No. 4, 03.2023, p. 1233-1250.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9d4f09860fdc4cdcab34f31fd29313c2,
title = "Non-native Douglas fir promotes epigeal spider density, but has a mixed effect on functional diversity",
abstract = "With climate change altering ecosystems worldwide, forest management in Europe is increasingly relying on more adaptable non-native tree species, such as Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). However, the ecological consequences of the increased utilization of Douglas fir on arthropod diversity and ecosystem functioning are not fully known. Here we assessed how non-native Douglas fir as well as large- and small-scale differences in the environmental context, affect epigeal spider abundance, biomass, taxonomic and functional diversity, and community structure in Central European forests. Our study sites were divided into two regions with large differences in environmental conditions, with seven replicates of five stand types, including monocultures of native European beech (Fagus sylvatica), non-native Douglas fir and native Norway spruce (Picea abies), as well as two-species mixtures of European beech and each of the conifers. Contrary to our expectations, Douglas fir promoted small-scale spider diversity, and abundance and biomass (activity density). On the other hand, it decreased spider functional divergence and altered spider community structure. Microhabitat characteristics had opposing effects on spider diversity and activity density, with more open stands harboring a more diverse but less abundant spider community. Overall, our findings suggest that increasing Douglas fir utilization at the expense of Norway spruce does not necessarily decrease the diversity of epigeal arthropods and may even promote local spider diversity and activity density. However, care needs to be taken in terms of biodiversity conservation because typical forest spider species and their functional divergence were more strongly associated with native beech than with coniferous stands.",
keywords = "Community structure, Forest specialists, Microhabitat variability, Mixed-species forestry, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Top-down control",
author = "Dragan Matevski and Andreas Schuldt",
note = "Funding Information: D.M. acknowledges funding by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 316045089/GRK2300. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s).",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/s10531-023-02547-5",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1233--1250",
journal = "Biodiversity and Conservation",
issn = "0960-3115",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-native Douglas fir promotes epigeal spider density, but has a mixed effect on functional diversity

AU - Matevski, Dragan

AU - Schuldt, Andreas

N1 - Funding Information: D.M. acknowledges funding by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 316045089/GRK2300. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).

PY - 2023/3

Y1 - 2023/3

N2 - With climate change altering ecosystems worldwide, forest management in Europe is increasingly relying on more adaptable non-native tree species, such as Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). However, the ecological consequences of the increased utilization of Douglas fir on arthropod diversity and ecosystem functioning are not fully known. Here we assessed how non-native Douglas fir as well as large- and small-scale differences in the environmental context, affect epigeal spider abundance, biomass, taxonomic and functional diversity, and community structure in Central European forests. Our study sites were divided into two regions with large differences in environmental conditions, with seven replicates of five stand types, including monocultures of native European beech (Fagus sylvatica), non-native Douglas fir and native Norway spruce (Picea abies), as well as two-species mixtures of European beech and each of the conifers. Contrary to our expectations, Douglas fir promoted small-scale spider diversity, and abundance and biomass (activity density). On the other hand, it decreased spider functional divergence and altered spider community structure. Microhabitat characteristics had opposing effects on spider diversity and activity density, with more open stands harboring a more diverse but less abundant spider community. Overall, our findings suggest that increasing Douglas fir utilization at the expense of Norway spruce does not necessarily decrease the diversity of epigeal arthropods and may even promote local spider diversity and activity density. However, care needs to be taken in terms of biodiversity conservation because typical forest spider species and their functional divergence were more strongly associated with native beech than with coniferous stands.

AB - With climate change altering ecosystems worldwide, forest management in Europe is increasingly relying on more adaptable non-native tree species, such as Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). However, the ecological consequences of the increased utilization of Douglas fir on arthropod diversity and ecosystem functioning are not fully known. Here we assessed how non-native Douglas fir as well as large- and small-scale differences in the environmental context, affect epigeal spider abundance, biomass, taxonomic and functional diversity, and community structure in Central European forests. Our study sites were divided into two regions with large differences in environmental conditions, with seven replicates of five stand types, including monocultures of native European beech (Fagus sylvatica), non-native Douglas fir and native Norway spruce (Picea abies), as well as two-species mixtures of European beech and each of the conifers. Contrary to our expectations, Douglas fir promoted small-scale spider diversity, and abundance and biomass (activity density). On the other hand, it decreased spider functional divergence and altered spider community structure. Microhabitat characteristics had opposing effects on spider diversity and activity density, with more open stands harboring a more diverse but less abundant spider community. Overall, our findings suggest that increasing Douglas fir utilization at the expense of Norway spruce does not necessarily decrease the diversity of epigeal arthropods and may even promote local spider diversity and activity density. However, care needs to be taken in terms of biodiversity conservation because typical forest spider species and their functional divergence were more strongly associated with native beech than with coniferous stands.

KW - Community structure

KW - Forest specialists

KW - Microhabitat variability

KW - Mixed-species forestry

KW - Pseudotsuga menziesii

KW - Top-down control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147758448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10531-023-02547-5

DO - 10.1007/s10531-023-02547-5

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85147758448

VL - 32

SP - 1233

EP - 1250

JO - Biodiversity and Conservation

JF - Biodiversity and Conservation

SN - 0960-3115

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Steve Janner

Publications

  1. Hidden Value
  2. The Case of Willetta Huggins
  3. Mitigation of methane emissions
  4. Bildungsstandards ja - aber wie?
  5. Where Are the Organizations? Accounting for the Fluidity and Ambiguity of Organizing in the Arts
  6. Changing the Rules
  7. Österreich Tourismus vor Weichenstellung: Stagnation oder Wachstum?
  8. Accounting for Information Infrastructure as Medium for Organisational Change
  9. Cultural Policies and Local Planning Strategies
  10. Introduction: Perspectives on Democracy
  11. Machen Urlaubsreisen glücklich?
  12. Readings in applied organizational behavior from the Lüneburg Symposium
  13. When back of pack meets front of pack
  14. A modified epitope identified for generation and monitoring of PSA-specific T cells in patients on early phases of PSA-based immunotherapeutic protocols
  15. De-hierarchization, trans-linearity and intersubjective participation in ethnographic research through interactive media representations: www.laviedurail.net
  16. Angsthasen
  17. Anstand
  18. Modelling ammonia losses after field application of biogas slurry in energy crop rotations
  19. Das Diktat des Hashtags
  20. Effects of weld line in deep drawing of tailor welded blanks of high strength steels
  21. Temporary Organizations
  22. Vergütung, variable
  23. Objects of Art after Duchamp
  24. Ora et labora (et lege)
  25. Transhumane Revolution
  26. Still want to Party?
  27. Lernen und Wiederlernen in chatbasiertem Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
  28. Sustainability-Oriented Innovation in SMEs
  29. An IAD framework analysis of minigrid institutions for sustainable rural electrification in East Africa
  30. Do learner characteristics moderate the seductive-details-effect?