Networks NOW: Belatedly Too Early: Special Issue

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesTransfer

Standard

Networks NOW: Belatedly Too Early: Special Issue. / Chun, Wendy.
In: Amerikastudien/American Studies, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2015, p. 37-58.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesTransfer

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ce2b2742a2094ea6b65b07ff9a65990f,
title = "Networks NOW: Belatedly Too Early: Special Issue",
abstract = "What is it about networks that makes them such a compelling, universal concept? How has “it{\textquoteright}s a network” become a valid answer: the end rather than the beginning of the analysis? Why and how has it become the diagram for both global capital and contemporary U.S. society? This article addresses these questions by arguing that networks have been central to the emergence, management, and imaginary of neoliberalism, in particular to its narrative of individuals collectively dissolving society. Tracing the ways in which networks, or more precisely the mapping of networks, were embraced as a way to evaporate the postmodern confusion that dominated the late-seventies and early-eighties, this article reveals that the force of networks stems from how they are imaged and what they are imagined to do. Networks allow us to trace and to spatialize unvisualizable interactions as flows: from global capital to environmental risks, from predation to affects. To begin to imagine networks differently, this article argues that, rather than focusing on network maps and connections, we need to think about new media in terms of habitual repetition and leaks.",
keywords = "Digital media",
author = "Wendy Chun",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "37--58",
journal = "Amerikastudien/American Studies",
issn = "0340-2827",
publisher = "Winter Universit{\"a}tsverlag",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Networks NOW: Belatedly Too Early

T2 - Special Issue

AU - Chun, Wendy

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - What is it about networks that makes them such a compelling, universal concept? How has “it’s a network” become a valid answer: the end rather than the beginning of the analysis? Why and how has it become the diagram for both global capital and contemporary U.S. society? This article addresses these questions by arguing that networks have been central to the emergence, management, and imaginary of neoliberalism, in particular to its narrative of individuals collectively dissolving society. Tracing the ways in which networks, or more precisely the mapping of networks, were embraced as a way to evaporate the postmodern confusion that dominated the late-seventies and early-eighties, this article reveals that the force of networks stems from how they are imaged and what they are imagined to do. Networks allow us to trace and to spatialize unvisualizable interactions as flows: from global capital to environmental risks, from predation to affects. To begin to imagine networks differently, this article argues that, rather than focusing on network maps and connections, we need to think about new media in terms of habitual repetition and leaks.

AB - What is it about networks that makes them such a compelling, universal concept? How has “it’s a network” become a valid answer: the end rather than the beginning of the analysis? Why and how has it become the diagram for both global capital and contemporary U.S. society? This article addresses these questions by arguing that networks have been central to the emergence, management, and imaginary of neoliberalism, in particular to its narrative of individuals collectively dissolving society. Tracing the ways in which networks, or more precisely the mapping of networks, were embraced as a way to evaporate the postmodern confusion that dominated the late-seventies and early-eighties, this article reveals that the force of networks stems from how they are imaged and what they are imagined to do. Networks allow us to trace and to spatialize unvisualizable interactions as flows: from global capital to environmental risks, from predation to affects. To begin to imagine networks differently, this article argues that, rather than focusing on network maps and connections, we need to think about new media in terms of habitual repetition and leaks.

KW - Digital media

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 60

SP - 37

EP - 58

JO - Amerikastudien/American Studies

JF - Amerikastudien/American Studies

SN - 0340-2827

IS - 1

ER -